Skip to main content
Log in

Confusion regarding the use of Natural Language Processing in ICU delirium assessment. Author’s reply

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. van Diem-Zaal IJ, van den Boogaard M, Kotfis K, Wesley Ely E (2022) Confusion regarding the use of Natural Language Processing in ICU delirium assessment. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06706-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Young M, Holmes N, Kishore K et al (2022) Natural language processing diagnosed behavioral disturbance vs confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit: prevalence, patient characteristics, overlap, and association with treatment and outcome. Intensive Care Med 48:559–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reade MC et al (2021) Is “behavioural disturbance” a clinically more useful concept than delirium" for trials in intensive care medicine? Crit Care Resusc 23:125–127

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Eijk MM, van den Boogaard M, van Marum RJ et al (2011) Routine use of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit: a multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 184:340–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J et al (2001) Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med 29:1370–1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Soja SL, Pandharipande PP, Fleming SB et al (2008) Implementation, reliability testing, and compliance monitoring of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in trauma patients. Intensive Care Med 34:1263–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Young.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Young, M., Holmes, N., Kishore, K. et al. Confusion regarding the use of Natural Language Processing in ICU delirium assessment. Author’s reply. Intensive Care Med 48, 983–984 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06738-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06738-6

Navigation