Skip to main content
Log in

Is “within 72 h” sufficiently early?

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W et al (2021) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43:304–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Egi M, Ogura H, Yatabe T et al (2021) The Japanese clinical practice guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020). J Intensive Care 9:53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00555-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Minard G, Kudsk KA, Melton S et al (2000) Early versus delayed feeding with an immune-enhancing diet in patients with severe head injuries. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 24(3):145–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607100024003145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reignier J, Boisramé-Helms J, Brisard L et al (2018) Enteral versus parenteral early nutrition in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2). Lancet 391:133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32146-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors affirm that they received no funding related to this study or the study it describes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception of the study and drafting of the manuscript, NH; data analysis and revision of the manuscript, KN and TY; supervision of the manuscript, JK. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoki Higashibeppu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

We declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript. The authors are the members of nutrition team in the J-SSCG 2020.

Ethical approval

This article does not require ethical consideration.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Higashibeppu, N., Nakamura, K., Yatabe, T. et al. Is “within 72 h” sufficiently early?. Intensive Care Med 48, 251–252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06561-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06561-5

Navigation