Hemodynamic response to prone ventilation in COVID-19 patients assessed with 3D transesophageal echocardiography

Dear Editor,

Prone positioning (PP) is proposed in ventilated patients for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) [1]. Hemodynamic assessment using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is proposed during PP in COVID-19 patients [2]. We sought to assess the hemodynamic response to PP using real-time three-dimensional (RT3D) TEE in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 ARDS.

Ventilated patients with confirmed COVID-19 ARDS underwent a RT3D TEE assessment immediately before, 1 h after PP, and 16 h later back to supine position (Supplementary materials). Results are expressed as medians and 25th-75th percentiles.

Nine patients were studied, all being hemodynamically stable without vasopressor support or other organ failure (Supplementary Table 1). Despite mild acute pulmonary hypertension, the right ventricle (RV) was not dilated as reflected by normal indexed end-diastolic volume (RVEDVi). Cardiac index (CI), RV and LV ejection fraction (EF) and strain rate were normal (Supplementary Table 2). All patients responded to PP [PaO2/FiO2: 127 (94–141) vs. 77 (67–94): p = 0.012]. During PP, RVEDVi and LVEDVi decreased (Fig. 1), while respective EF and strain rate remained stable. Back in supine position, RVEDVi and LVEDVi increased but remained within normal range (Fig. 1), while biventricular EF, CI and strain rate kept steady. LV end-systolic eccentricity index (ESEI) normalized during PP and returned to baseline values back in supine position (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).

Fig. 1
figure1

Variations of indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume and cardiac index during and after prone positioning in the study group (n = 8) with stable hemodynamics and in the single patient who deteriorated his hemodynamic status. Variations of indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume (blue symbols) during and after prone ventilation are plotted with those of cardiac index (green symbols), when using baseline as reference. Box plots indicate median (thick horizontal bar), 25th and 75th percentiles (bottom/top of the boxes), as well as 5th and 95th percentiles (thin horizontal bars). Closed circles indicate individual values of indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume and cardiac index in the patient who deteriorated during and after prone positioning. Dotted lines connect median and dashed lines connect individual values. The grey area indicates the normal range of indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume measured with RT3D TEE. In the single patient who deteriorated, preload-dependence was identified by significant superior vena cava (SVC) collapsibility index at baseline and 1 h after prone positioning (upper left panel). A 1.5L fluid challenge reduced SVC collapsibility index (lower right panel) but failed to avoid further deterioration of cardiac index. The transgastric short-axis view of the heart depicted a moderate cor pulmonale at baseline, with an end-systolic eccentricity index of 1.5 (lower left panel) which transiently normalized close to unity during prone positioning (lower middle panel). Moderate cor pulmonale resumed after return to supine position with an end-systolic eccentricity index of 1.4 (upper right panel)

One patient had moderate acute cor pulmonale (ACP) with preserved LV systolic function at baseline. During PP, RVEDVi decreased and paradoxal septal motion disappeared, as reflected by a normalized LVESEI (Fig. 1). Despite normal mean blood pressure, CI, LVEF and LV strain rate decreased from 5.0 to 3.6 L/min/m2, 61% to 35%, and − 20% to − 14%, respectively, whereas systemic vascular resistances (SVR) remained low (from 950 to 989 mmHg/L/min). The patient developed oliguria. A 1.5L fluid challenge was performed due to preload-dependence (Fig. 1). Back in supine position, hypotension occurred secondary to a drop of CI to 2.25 L/min/m2 despite normalized SVR (1500 mmHg/L/min). Moderate ACP recurred as reflected by increased RVEDVi and LVESEI, while both LVEF and LV strain rate decreased to 25% and − 13%, respectively, in the absence of preload dependence (Fig. 1). Kidney function subsequently deteriorated (creatinine: 71 µmol/L to 220 µmol/L).

During PP, RT3D echocardiography which has been validated against MRI [3], depicted a transient decrease of ventricular volumes which was not tracked by two-dimensional imaging (Supplementary Table 4), and a non-significant decrease of LV stroke volume compensated by increased heart rate. The significant yet reversible decrease of RVEDVi and normalization of LVESEI confirm the beneficial effect of PP on afterloaded RV [4]. Despite the transient reversal of a moderate ACP, one of our patients developed severe LV systolic dysfunction with decreased CI and altered myocardial contractility. This resulted in a worsened low flow state and subsequent acute renal failure. TEE during PP was well-tolerated [5]. Although this observational study is limited by its small sample size and warrant confirmation, it suggests that RT3D TEE monitoring is feasible and promises to track individual hemodynamic response to PP which may unpredictably be deleterious.

References

  1. 1.

    Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Caironi P, Busana M, Romitti F, Brazzi L, Camporota L (2020) COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes? Intensive Care Med 46:1099–1102

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Teran F, Burns KM, Narasimhan M, Goffi A, Mohabir P, Horowitz JM, Yuriditsky E, Nagdev A, Panebianco N, Chin EJ, Gottlieb M, Koenig S, Arntfield R (2020) Critical care transesophageal echocardiography in patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2020.05.022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Shimada YJ, Shiota M, Siegel RJ, Shiota T (2010) Accuracy of right ventricular volumes and function determined by three-dimensional echocardiography in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:943–953

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vieillard-Baron A, Charron C, Caille V, Belliard G, Page B, Jardin F (2007) Prone positioning unloads the right ventricle in severe ARDS. Chest 132:1440–1446

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mekontso Dessap A, Boissier F, Charron C, Bégot E, Repessé X, Legras A, Brun-Buisson C, Vignon P, Vieillard-Baron A (2016) Acute cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: prevalence, predictors, and clinical impact. Intensive Care Med 42:862–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BE and PV designed the study. BE, MG, ALF included the patients and performed the echocardiography. BE and MG reviewed off-line all echocardiography studies. BE and PV drafted the manuscript. MG and ALF critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Vignon.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical Committee accepted this observational study and waived the need for informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 61 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evrard, B., Goudelin, M., Fedou, AL. et al. Hemodynamic response to prone ventilation in COVID-19 patients assessed with 3D transesophageal echocardiography. Intensive Care Med 46, 2099–2101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06217-w

Download citation