Skip to main content

Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China

A Correction to this article was published on 06 April 2020

This article has been updated

Dear Editor,

The rapid emergence of COVID-19 in Wuhan city, Hubei Province, China, has resulted in thousands of deaths [1]. Many infected patients, however, presented mild flu-like symptoms and quickly recover [2]. To effectively prioritize resources for patients with the highest risk, we identified clinical predictors of mild and severe patient outcomes.

Using the database of Jin Yin-tan Hospital and Tongji Hospital, we conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 68 death cases (68/150, 45%) and 82 discharged cases (82/150, 55%) with laboratory-confirmed infection of SARS-CoV-2. Patients met the discharge criteria if they had no fever for at least 3 days, significantly improved respiratory function, and had negative SARS-CoV-2 laboratory test results twice in succession. Case data included demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory results, treatment options and outcomes. For statistical analysis, we represented continuous measurements as means (SDs) or as medians (IQRs) which compared with Student’s t test or the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test. Categorical variables were expressed as numbers (%) and compared by the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test.

The distribution of the enrolled patients’ age is shown in Fig. 1a. There was a significant difference in age between the death group and the discharge group (p < 0.001) but no difference in the sex ratio (p = 0.43). A total of 63% (43/68) of patients in the death group and 41% (34/82) in the discharge group had underlying diseases (p = 0.0069). It should be noted that patients with cardiovascular diseases have a significantly increased risk of death when they are infected with SARS-CoV-2 (p < 0.001). A total of 16% (11/68) of the patients in the death group had secondary infections, and 1% (1/82) of the patients in the discharge group had secondary infections (p = 0.0018). Laboratory results showed that there were significant differences in white blood cell counts, absolute values of lymphocytes, platelets, albumin, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, blood creatinine, myoglobin, cardiac troponin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) between the two groups (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Age distribution of patients with confirmed COVID-19; b key laboratory parameters for the outcomes of patients with confirmed COVID-19; c interval from onset of symptom to death of patients with confirmed COVID-19; d summary of the cause of death of 68 died patients with confirmed COVID-19

The survival times of the enrolled patients in the death group were analyzed. The distribution of survival time from disease onset to death showed two peaks, with the first one at approximately 14 days (22 cases) and the second one at approximately 22 days (17 cases) (Fig. 1c). An analysis of the cause of death was performed. Among the 68 fatal cases, 36 patients (53%) died of respiratory failure, five patients (7%) with myocardial damage died of circulatory failure, 22 patients (33%) died of both, and five remaining died of an unknown cause (Fig. 1d). Based on the analysis of the clinical data, we confirmed that some patients died of fulminant myocarditis. In this study, we first reported that the infection of SARS-CoV-2 may cause fulminant myocarditis. Given that fulminant myocarditis is characterized by a rapid progress and a severe state of illness [3], our results should alert physicians to pay attention not only to the symptoms of respiratory dysfunction but also the symptoms of cardiac injury.

Further, large-scale studies and the studies on autopsy are needed to confirm our analysis.

In conclusion, predictors of a fatal outcome in COVID-19 cases included age, the presence of underlying diseases, the presence of secondary infection and elevated inflammatory indicators in the blood. The results obtained from this study also suggest that COVID-19 mortality might be due to virus-activated “cytokine storm syndrome” or fulminant myocarditis.

Change history

  • 06 April 2020

    Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China.


  1. Mahase E (2020) Coronavirus: covid-19 has killed more people than SARS and MERS combined, despite lower case fatality rate. BMJ 368:m641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, Qiu Y, Wang J, Liu Y, Wei Y, Xia J, T Yu, Zhang X, Zhang L (2020) Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang D, Li S, Jiang J, Yan J, Zhao C, Wang Y, Ma Y, Zeng H, Guo X, Wang H, Tang J, Zuo H, Lin L, Cui G, Section of Precision Medicine Group of Chinese Society of Cardiology, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology, Working Group of Adult Fulminant Myocarditis (2019) Chinese society of cardiology expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of adult fulminant myocarditis. Sci China Life Sci 62(2):187–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are indebted to Prof. Tie Chen and Prof. Daowen Wang, who helped to prepare and review the manuscript. We also thank Drs. Yanping Cai, Yin Lv, Jia Chen, Nana Xie, Jiling Zhu, Mingyou Xing, Yuan Song, Chaolin Huang, Li Zhang and Xingjie Hao for collecting cases or scientific support. And we gratefully acknowledge all the health care workers on the front line and all the patients involved in the study.


This work was supported by the Emergency Project for the Prevention and Control of the Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Outbreak in Hubei Province, China, as well as the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81703174 and 81602722). The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study, the analysis and interpretation of the data, or in the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



JXS, QRR and KY contributed to the conception and design of the study, had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. KY, WXW and LYJ contributed to the acquisition of data. KY, WXW, LYJ and JXS contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. KY and WXW contributed to the statistical analyses. All authors participated in manuscript writing, revision and approval for final submission. Drs. QRR and KY contributed equally and shared first authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianxin Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Commission of Jin Yin-tan Hospital (KY-2020-14.01) and the Ethics Commission of Tongji Hospital (TJ-C20200125).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruan, Q., Yang, K., Wang, W. et al. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med 46, 846–848 (2020).

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: