Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 44, Issue 9, pp 1427–1435 | Cite as

Intensive care utilization following major noncardiac surgical procedures in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study

  • Angela JerathEmail author
  • Andreas Laupacis
  • Peter C. Austin
  • Hannah Wunsch
  • Duminda N. Wijeysundera
Original

Abstract

Purpose

Patients are sometimes admitted to intensive care units (ICU) after elective noncardiac surgery for advanced monitoring and treatments not available on a general postsurgical ward. However, patterns of ICU utilization are poorly understood. Our aims were to assess the incidence and determinants of ICU utilization after elective noncardiac surgical procedures.

Methods

Population-based cohort study included adult patients who underwent 13 types of major elective noncardiac surgical procedures between 2006 and 2014 in Ontario, Canada. Primary outcome was early admission to ICU within 24 h after surgery. A prespecified analysis using multilevel logistic regression modeling separately examined patient- and hospital-level factors associated with early ICU admission within distinct groups of surgical procedures.

Results

Early ICU admission occurred in 9.6% of the included 541,524 patients. Patients admitted early to ICU showed higher median age (68 vs. 65 years), burden of prehospital comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index score ≥ 2, 33.1 vs. 10.4%), 30-day mortality rates (2.4 vs. 0.3%), and longer median postoperative hospital stays (6 vs. 4 days) than patients admitted to a ward. There was wide variation in proportions of patients admitted early to ICU across different surgery types (0.9% for hysterectomy to 90.8% for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair) with generally low 30-day mortality across procedures (0.1–2.8%). Within individual procedures, there was wide interhospital variation in the range of early ICU admission rates (hysterectomy 0.07–14.4%, lower gastrointestinal resection 1.3–95%, endovascular aortic aneurysm 1.3–95.2%). The individual hospital where surgery was performed accounted for a large proportion of the variation in early ICU admission rates, with the median odds ratio ranging from 2.3 for hysterectomy to 21.5 for endovascular aortic aneurysm.

Conclusions

There is a wide variation in early ICU admission across and within surgical procedures. The individual hospital accounts for a large proportion of this variation. Further research is required to identify the basis for this variation and to develop better methods for allocating ICU resources for postoperative management of surgical patients.

Keywords

Critical care Surgery Epidemiology Health services research 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Academic Health Science Centre Alternative Funding Plan (AHSC AFP) Innovation Fund. DNW is supported in part by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. HW and DNW are supported in part by Merit Awards from the Department of Anesthesia at the University of Toronto. AL holds a Canada Research Chair in Health Policy and Citizen Engagement. PCA is supported by a Career Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation.

Supplementary material

134_2018_5330_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3538 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G, Lipsitz SR, Esquivel MM, Uribe-Leitz T, Fu R, Azad T, Chao TE, Berry WR, Gawande AA (2015) Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet 385:S11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gillies MA, Harrison EM, Pearse RM, Garrioch S, Haddow C, Smyth L, Parks R, Walsh TS, Lone NI (2017) Intensive care utilization and outcomes after high-risk surgery in Scotland: a population-based cohort study. Br J Anaesth 118:123–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biccard BM, Madiba TE, South African Surgical Outcomes Study Investigators (2015) The South African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study. S Afr Med J 105:465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pearse RM, Moreno RP, Bauer P, Pelosi P, Metnitz P, Spies C, Vallet B, Vincent J-L, Hoeft A, Rhodes A (2012) Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study. Lancet 380:1059–1065CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Care in Canadian ICUs. August 2016Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wunsch H, Gershengorn HB, Cooke CR, Guerra C, Angus DC, Rowe JW, Li G (2016) Use of intensive care services for medicare beneficiaries undergoing major surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 124:899–907CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kahan BC, Koulenti D, Arvaniti K, Beavis V, Campbell D, Chan M, Moreno R, Pearse RM, International Surgical Outcomes Study Group (2017) Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries. Intensive Care Med 43:971–979CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gillies MA, Pearse RM (2016) Intensive care after high-risk surgery: what’s in a name? Anesthesiology 124:761–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghaffar S, Pearse RM, Gillies MA (2017) ICU admission after surgery: who benefits? Curr Opin Crit Care 23:424–429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gillies MA, Power GS, Harrison DA, Fleming A, Cook B, Walsh TS, Pearse RM, Rowan KM (2015) Regional variation in critical care provision and outcome after high-risk surgery. Intensive Care Med 41:1809–1816CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wunsch H, Angus DC, Harrison DA, Collange O, Fowler R, Hoste EA, de Keizer NF, Kersten A, Linde-Zwirble WT, Sandiumenge A, Rowan KM (2008) Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe. Crit Care Med 36(2787–2793):e2781–e2789Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wunsch H, Angus DC, Harrison DA, Linde-Zwirble WT, Rowan KM (2011) Comparison of medical admissions to intensive care units in the United States and United Kingdom. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183:1666–1673CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    International Surgical Outcomes Study Group (2016) Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth 117:601–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudanal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charlson ME, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hux JE, Ivis F, Flintoft V, Bica A (2002) Diabetes in Ontario: determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm. Diabetes Care 25:512–516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tu K, Campbell NRC, Chen Z, Cauch-Dudek KJ, McAlister FA (2007) Accuracy of administrative databases in identifying patients with hypertension. Open Med 1:E18–E26PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gershon AS, Wang C, Guan J, Vasilevska-Ristovska J, Cicutto L, To T (2009) Identifying individuals with physician diagnosed COPD in health administrative databases. Copd 6:388–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quan H, Khan N, Hemmelgarn BR, Tu K, Chen G, Campbell N, Hill MD, Ghali WA, McAlister FA (2009) Validation of a case definition to define hypertension using administrative data. Hypertension 54:1423–1428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garland A, Yogendran M, Olafson K, Scales DC, McGowan KL, Fransoo R (2012) The accuracy of administrative data for identifying the presence and timing of admission to intensive care units in a Canadian province. Med Care 50:e1–e6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scales DC, Guan J, Martin CM, Redelmeier DA (2006) Administrative data accurately identified intensive care unit admissions in Ontario. J Clin Epidemiol 59:802–807CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Juurlink D, Preyra C, Croxford R, Chong A, Austin P (2006) Canadian Institute for health information discharge abstract database: a validation study. ICES investigative report, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). CIHI data quality study of the 2009–2010. Discharge Abstract Database. Revised June 2012Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mukaka MM (2012) Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 24:69–71PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harrell FE Jr (2015) Regression modeling strategies. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Austin PC, Merlo J (2017) Intermediate and advanced topics in multilevel logistic regression analysis. Stat Med 36:3257–3277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Austin PC, Steyerberg EW (2014) Graphical assessment of internal and external calibration of logistic regression models by using loess smoothers. Stat Med 33:517–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Admon AJ, Wunsch H, Iwashyna TJ, Cooke CR (2017) Hospital contributions to variability in the use of ICUs among elderly Medicare recipients. Crit Care Med 45:75–84CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gershengorn HB, Iwashyna TJ, Cooke CR, Scales DC, Kahn JM, Wunsch H (2012) Variation in use of intensive care for adults with diabetic ketoacidosis. Crit Care Med 40:2009–2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen R, Strait KM, Dharmarajan K, Li SX, Ranasinghe I, Martin J, Fazel R, Masoudi FA, Cooke CR, Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM (2015) Hospital variation in admission to intensive care units for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 170:1161–1169CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gershengorn HB, Garland A, Gong MN (2015) Patterns of daily costs differ for medical and surgical intensive care unit patients. Ann Am Thorac Soc 12:1831–1836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sjoding MW, Prescott HC, Wunsch H, Iwashyna TJ, Cooke CR (2015) Hospitals with the highest intensive care utilization provide lower quality pneumonia care to the elderly. Crit Care Med 43:1178–1186CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Valley TS, Sjoding MW, Ryan AM, Iwashyna TJ, Cooke CR (2015) Association of intensive care unit admission with mortality among older patients with pneumonia. JAMA 314:1272–1279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature and ESICM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesia and Pain ManagementToronto General HospitalTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiaUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Institute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s HospitalTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations