A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: the ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators
- 14k Downloads
To determine whether early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) reduces mortality compared with other resuscitation strategies for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with septic shock.
Using a search strategy of PubMed, EmBase and CENTRAL, we selected all relevant randomised clinical trials published from January 2000 to January 2015. We translated non-English papers and contacted authors as necessary. Our primary analysis generated a pooled odds ratio (OR) from a fixed-effect model. Sensitivity analyses explored the effect of including non-ED studies, adjusting for study quality, and conducting a random-effects model. Secondary outcomes included organ support and hospital and ICU length of stay.
From 2395 initially eligible abstracts, five randomised clinical trials (n = 4735 patients) met all criteria and generally scored high for quality except for lack of blinding. There was no effect on the primary mortality outcome (EGDT: 23.2 % [495/2134] versus control: 22.4 % [582/2601]; pooled OR 1.01 [95 % CI 0.88–1.16], P = 0.9, with heterogeneity [I 2 = 57 %; P = 0.055]). The pooled estimate of 90-day mortality from the three recent multicentre studies (n = 4063) also showed no difference [pooled OR 0.99 (95 % CI 0.86–1.15), P = 0.93] with no heterogeneity (I 2 = 0.0 %; P = 0.97). EGDT increased vasopressor use (OR 1.25 [95 % CI 1.10–1.41]; P < 0.001) and ICU admission [OR 2.19 (95 % CI 1.82–2.65); P < 0.001]. Including six non-ED randomised trials increased heterogeneity (I 2 = 71 %; P < 0.001) but did not change overall results [pooled OR 0.94 (95 % CI 0.82 to 1.07); P = 0.33].
EGDT is not superior to usual care for ED patients with septic shock but is associated with increased utilisation of ICU resources.
KeywordsEarly goal-directed therapy or EGDT Resuscitation Septic shock Central venous oxygen saturation Meta-analysis Systematic review Randomised clinical trials
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 12.Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, Harrison DA, Sadique MZ, Grieve RG, Jahan R, Harvey SE, Bell D, Bion JF, Coats TJ, Singer M, Young JD, Rowan KM, ProMISe Trial Investigators (2015) Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 372(14):1301–1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane hand book for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] http://handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 29 Mar 2015
- 18.Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC, Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Arnold RC, Claremont HA, Kline JA, Emergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMShockNet) Investigators (2010) Lactateclearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomised clinical trial. JAMA 303:739–746PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.de Oliveira CF, de Oliveira DS, Gottschald AF, Moura JD, Costa GA, Ventura AC, Fernandes JC, Vaz FA, Carcillo JA, Rivers EP, Troster EJ (2008) ACCM/PALS haemodynamic support guidelines for paediatric septic shock: an outcomes comparison with and without monitoring central venous oxygen saturation. Intensive Care Med 34:1065–1075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group of Zhejiang Province (2010) The effect of early goal-directed therapy on treatment of critical patients with severe sepsis/septic shock: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised, controlled study. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 22:331–334Google Scholar
- 24.Yu B, Tian HY, Hu ZJ, Zhao C, Liu LX, Zhang Y, Zhu GJ, Wang LT, Wu XH, Li J (2013) Comparison of the effect of fluid resuscitation as guided either by lactate clearance rate or by central venous oxygen saturation in patients with sepsis. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 25:578–583PubMedGoogle Scholar