The “koala stress syndrome” and adrenal responsiveness in the critically ill

Virtually all stressors, including infections, physical trauma, and even psychological insults, result in activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis with the release of cortisol [1]. At low basal levels cortisol binds to the high affinity, low capacity mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). However, with increased cortisol secretion the MRs are saturated and cortisol then binds to the low affinity, high capacity glucocorticoid receptor (GR). The cortisol–GR complex acts via multiple genomic and non-genomic mechanisms to enhance cardiovascular reserve and provide a ready source of fuel (glucose) for the brain and musculoskeletal system, allowing the organism to take appropriate action (flight or fight) while preventing excessive activation of the immune system [2]. In addition, the increase in serum cortisol during stress protects the organism against developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [3]. The fight and flight response is essential for survival and is present in the most primitive of species. Furthermore, within species the degree of activation of the HPA axis has evolved to match the degree of stress to which the organism is exposed (see Fig. 1). The koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) is a herbivorous marsupial native to Australia which evolved in an environment with no natural predators. Consequently the koala has a vestigial adrenal gland and is unable to produce cortisol when challenged (by man) and instead of running away or fighting will go into a state of shock known as the “koala stress syndrome”. As is evident from Fig. 1, humans have evolved in a stressful environment and consequently have a brisk increase in cortisol in response to stress. Hypoxia, hypotension, and sepsis are amongst the most potent activators of the HPA axis and critically ill patients therefore usually have very high cortisol levels. When cortisol synthesis is blocked (with an etomidate infusion) the mortality of critically ill patients increases dramatically [4]. As a result of decreased cortisol secretion and/or tissue resistance (GR abnormalities) inadequate corticosteroid activity is present in many critically ill patients, particularly those with sepsis. This condition has been termed critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) [5, 6]. The presence of CIRCI may increase the morbidity and mortality of critically ill patients and predispose to PTSD [69].

Fig. 1

Basal and stressed cortisol level amongst various animal species

The diagnosis of CIRCI is fraught with difficulties and at present this diagnosis is best made by a random (stress) cortisol of less than 10 µg/dl or a delta cortisol of less than 9 µg/dl after a 250 µg ACTH stimulation test [5, 6, 10]. One approach to resolving the question of whether too little glucocorticoid signal ultimately “gets through” is to examine target tissues whose function is regulated in part by glucocorticoids. Through their inhibitory effects on nuclear factor-κβ signaling pathways, glucocorticoids are the most potent anti-inflammatory hormones in the body and thereby serve to suppress the production and activity of proinflammatory cytokines during exposure to stress. Inadequate glucocorticoid-mediated feedback inhibition of the immune response will result in excess circulating levels of proinflammatory mediators.

In this edition of Intensive Care Medicine, Kwon et al. [11] measured the levels of proinflammatory mediators in a cohort of 82 patients, most of whom had sepsis. Thirty-six patients (43%) met the criteria for CIRCI. The authors divided the patients with CIRCI into two groups, namely (1) those with a low basal cortisol (basal cortisol <10 µg/dl) and (2) those with a basal cortisol of at least 10 µg/dl and a delta cortisol less than 9 µg/dl. In the group of patients with a low delta cortisol, the serum levels of proinflammatory mediators were markedly elevated compared to the group of patients with a low basal cortisol. In the low basal cortisol group the levels of proinflammatory mediators were similar to those of the non-CIRCI control patients. These data suggest that the CIRCI subgroup with a low delta cortisol may truly have too little glucocorticoid signaling while the low baseline subgroup appears to have adequate cellular glucocorticoid activity. From a pathophysiological and therapeutic standpoint it may therefore be useful to divide CIRCI into two subgroups, namely: type I, characterized by a random (stress) cortisol of less than 10 µg/dl; and type II, characterized by a random cortisol of at least 10 µg/dl and a delta cortisol less than 9 µg/dl. The practical implication of this classification is that only patients with type II CIRCI may benefit from stress doses of corticosteroids. Additional studies are required to confirm the findings of Kwon et al. and future studies investigating the role of treatment with corticosteroids should a priori divide the patients into CIRCI subgroups.


  1. 1.

    Selye H (1936) A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature 136:32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chrousos GP, Gold PW (1992) The concepts of stress and stress system disorders. Overview of physical and behavioral homeostasis. JAMA 267:1244–1252

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cohen H, Zohar J, Gidron Y, Matar MA, Belkind D, Loewenthal U, Kozlovsky N, Kaplan Z (2006) Blunted HPA axis response to stress influences susceptibility to posttraumatic stress response in rats. Biol Psychiatry 59:1208–1218

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Watt I, Ledingham IM (1984) Mortality amongst multiple trauma patients admitted to an intensive therapy unit. Anaesthesia 39:973–981

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Marik PE, Pastores SM, Annane D, Meduri GU, Sprung CL, Arlt W, Keh D, Briegel J, Beishuizen A, Dimopoulou I, Tsagarakis S, Singer M, Chrousos GP, Zaloga G, Bokhari F, Vogeser M, American College of Critical Care Medicine (2008) Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: consensus statements from an international task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 36:1937–1949

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Marik PE (2009) Critical illness related corticosteroid insufficiency. Chest 135:181–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tang BM, Craig JC, Eslick GD, Seppelt I, McLean AS (2009) Use of corticosteroids in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 37:1595–1603

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Annane D, Bellissant E, Bollaert PE, Briegel J, Confalonieri M, De Gaudio R, Keh D, Kupfer Y, Oppert M, Meduri GU (2009) Corticosteroids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults: a systematic review. JAMA 301:2349–2361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Weis F, Kilger E, Roozendaal B, de Quervain DJ, Lamm P, Schmidt M, Schmölz M, Briegel J, Schelling G (2006) Stress doses of hydrocortisone reduce chronic stress symptoms and improve health-related quality of life in high-risk patients after cardiac surgery: a randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:277–282

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Annane D, Maxime V, Ibrahim F, Alvarez JC, Abe E, Boudou P (2006) Diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency in severe sepsis and septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174:1319–1326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kwon YS, Suh GY, Jeon K, Park SY, Lim SY, Koh W-J, Chung MP, Kim H, Kwon OJ (2010) Serum cytokines and critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency. Intensive Care Med. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1971-9

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial interest in any of the products mentioned in this paper.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul E. Marik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marik, P.E., Levitov, A. The “koala stress syndrome” and adrenal responsiveness in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 36, 1805–1806 (2010).

Download citation