Skip to main content
Log in

Electroencephalography: the worst traditionally recommended tool for brain death confirmation

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Wennervita J, Salmi T, Hynynen M, Yli-Hankaa A, Koivusalo AM, Van Gils M, Pöyhiä R, Vakkuri A (2006) Entropy is more resistant to artifacts than bispectral index in brain-dead organ donors. Intensive Care Med DOI 10.1007/s00134-006-0429-6

  2. Guérit JM, Fischer C, Facco E, Tinuper P, Murri L, Ronne-Engström E, Nuwer M (1999) Standards of clinical practice or EEG and EPs in comatose and other unresponsive states. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52:117–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grigg MM, Kelly MA, Celesia GG, Ghobrial MW, Ross ER (1987) Electroencephalographic activity after BD. Arch Neurol 44:948–954

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guérit JM (2004) The concept of brain death. In: Machado C, Shewmon DA (eds) Brain death and disorders of consciousness. Kluwer Academics, New York, pp 15–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Michel Guérit.

Additional information

This editorial refers to the article available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-429-6

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guérit, JM. Electroencephalography: the worst traditionally recommended tool for brain death confirmation. Intensive Care Med 33, 9–10 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0430-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0430-0

Navigation