Skip to main content

Validity of medical staff assessment at admission of patient's risk of nosocomial infection: A prospective study in a surgical intensive care unit

Abstract

Objective

to evaluate the ability of a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) medical staff to assess at admission the individual risk of nosocomial infection (NI) during SICU stay in patients admitted for at least 48 h.

Design

prospective observational study.

Setting

a tertiary-care university hospital.

Patients and participants

201 admissions to the SICU from November 19, 2003, until April 16, 2004.

Measurements and results

assessment by medical staff at admission of each patient's estimated risk of NI (pneumonia, venous central catheter-related infection, symptomatic urinary tract infection, and bacteremia) during SICU hospitalization, in order to classify patients into four groups: NI risk very low or absent (group 1), low (group 2), high (group 3), very high or certain (group 4). NI was diagnosed via routine surveillance according to Centers for Disease Control case definitions.

Results

154 patients were assessed; the percentage of patients with NI increased with estimated risk at admission, from 0% in group 1 to 14.3% in group 4. Positive predictive value of medical assessment varied from 8.4% to 14.5%, according to the cutoff value. Negative predictive value varied from 92.1% to 100%.

Conclusion

our study suggests that ICU physicians encounter a major difficulty when informing patients or patients' families about the risk of NI occurrence, as they cannot predict this risk accurately. This limitation should be explained to patients and their families.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Vincent JL (1998) Information in the ICU: are we being honest with our patients? The results of a European questionnaire. Intensive Care Med 24:1237–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eggimann P, Pittet D (2001) Infection control in the ICU. Chest 120:2059–2093

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM (1996) CDC definitions for nosocomial infections In: Olmsted RN (ed) APIC Infection control and hospital epidemiology: Principles and practice. Mosby, St Louis, pp A1–A20

  4. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European / North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell CM, Redelmeier DA (2001) Mortality among patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays. N Engl J Med 345:663–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cochran AJ (1997) Prediction of outcome for patients with cutaneous melanoma. Pigment Cell Res 10:162–167

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA, Heijborek RP, Verbeek AL, Debruyne FM (1993) Predictability of recurrent and progressive disease in individual patients with primary superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 150:60–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Glare G, Virik K, Jones M, Hudson M, Eychmuller S, Simes J, Christakis N (2003) A systematic review of physicians' survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. Br Med J 327:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Richard Medeiros, Rouen University Hospital Medical Editor, for his valuable editorial assistance.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Véronique Merle.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merle, V., Hallais, C., Tavolacci, MP. et al. Validity of medical staff assessment at admission of patient's risk of nosocomial infection: A prospective study in a surgical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 32, 915–918 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0153-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0153-2

Keywords

  • Hospital infection
  • Individual assessment
  • Information
  • Non-pulmonary nosocomial infections
  • Pulmonary nosocomial infections