References
Brochard L (2003) The purpose of the reviewing process: a guide to authors. Intensive Care Med 29:1401–1402
Hoppin FG Jr (2002) How I review an original scientific article. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:1019–1023
Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ (2005) A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:848–854
Dreyfuss D (2005) Is it better to consent to an RCT or to care? Μηδεν αγαν (“nothing in excess”). Intensive Care Med 31:345–355
Brochard L (2005) “Intensive Care Medicine”: what we offer to our readers and what the readers think of it. Intensive Care Med 31:609–610
Knotzer H, Maier S, Duenser MW, Hasibeder WR, Hausdorfer H, Brandner J, Torgersen C, Ulmer H, Friesenecker B, Iannetti C, Pajk W (2006) Arginine vasopressin does not alter mucosal tissue oxygen tension and oxygen supply in an acute endotoxemic pig model. Intensive Care Med (DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-2858-z)
Fumis RL, Nishimoto IN, Deheinzelin D (2006) Determinants of family dissatisfaction with the intensive care unit. A prospective study. Intensive Care Med (DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-2857-0)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brochard, L. Publishing the review process: an initiative for readers, authors and (future) reviewers. Intensive Care Med 32, 1–2 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2871-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2871-2