Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Glycemic control in the ICU: a multicenter survey

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intensive insulin therapy has recently been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality in the critically ill population in a large randomized clinical trial.

Objective

To determine the beliefs and attitudes of ICU clinicians about glycemic control.

Design

Self-administered survey.

Participants

ICU nurses and physicians in five university-affiliated multidisciplinary ICUs.

Results

A total of 317 questionnaires were returned from 233 ICU nurses and 84 physicians. The reported clinically important threshold for hypoglycemia was 4 mmol/l (median, IQR 3–4 mmol/l). In non-diabetic patients, the clinically important threshold for hyperglycemia was 10 mmol/l (IQR 9–12 mmol/l); however, nurses had a significantly higher threshold than physicians (difference of 0.52 mmol/l (95% CI 0.09–0.94 mmol/l, P=0.018). In diabetic patients, the clinically important threshold for hyperglycemia was also 10 mmol/l (IQR 10–12 mmol/l), and again nurses had a significantly higher threshold than physicians (0.81 mmol/l, 95% CI 0.29–1.32 mmol/l, P=0.0023). Avoidance of hyperglycemia was judged most important for diabetic patients (87.7%, 95% CI 84.1–91.3%), patients with acute brain injury (84.5%, 95% CI 80.5–88.5%), patients with a recent seizure (74.4%, 95% CI 69.6–79.3%), patients with advanced liver disease (64.0%, 95% CI 58.7–69.3%), and for patients with acute myocardial infarction (64.0%, 95% CI 58.7–69.3%). Physicians expressed more concern than nurses about avoiding hyperglycemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction (P=0.0004). ICU clinicians raised concerns about the accuracy of glucometer measurements in critically ill patients (46.1%, 95% CI 40.5–51.6%).

Conclusions

Attention to these beliefs and attitudes could enhance the success of future clinical, educational and research efforts to modify clinician behavior and achieve better glycemic control in the ICU setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1993) The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the long term complications in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329:977–986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (1998) Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837–853

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Capes SE, Hunt D, Malmberg K, Gerstein HC (2000) Stress hyperglycemia and increased risk of death after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: a systematic overview. Lancet 355:773–778

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Capes SE, Hunt D, Malberg K, Pathak P, Gerstein H (2001) Stress hyperglycemia and prognosis of stroke in nondiabetic and diabetic patients: a systematic overview. Stroke 32:2426–2432

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Malmberg K, Ryden L, Efendic S, Nicol P, Waldenström A, Wedel H, Welin L (1995) Randomized trial of insulin-glucose followed by subcutaneous insulin treatment in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (DIGAMI study): effects on mortality at one year. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:57–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Malmberg K (1997) Prospective randomized study of intensive insulin treatment on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus (DIGAMI). BMJ 314:1512–1515

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, Vlasselaers D, Ferdinande P, Lauwers P, Bouillon R (2001) Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 345:1359–1367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Umpierrez GE, Isaccs SD, Bazargan N, You X, Thaler LM, Kitabchi AE (2002) Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:978–982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Juniper E, Griffith L, McIlroy W, Willan A, Jaeschke R, Epstein R (1993) Interviewer versus self-administered questionnaires in developing a disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument for asthma. J Clin Epidemiol 46:529–534

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Balas EA, Weingarten S, Garb C, Blumenthal D, Boren SA, Brown GD (2000) Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med 160:301–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Norhammar A, Tenerz A, Nilsson G, Hamsten A, Efendic S, Ryden L, Malmberg K (2002) Glucose metabolism in patients with acute myocardial infarction and no previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: a prospective study. Lancet 359:2140–2144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown G, Dodek P (2001) Intravenous insulin infusion nomogram improves blood glucose control in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 29:1714–1719

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ray J, Hamielec C, Matracci T (2001) Pilot study of the accuracy of bedside glucometry in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 29:2205–2207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brozek J, McMullin J, Jaeschke R, Waugh L, Gibson J, Cook DJ (2003) Glycemic control in the ICU: comparing glucometer versus laboratory measurements. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 167:A252

    Google Scholar 

  15. Griffith LE, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Charles C (1999) Comparison of open versus closed questionnaire formats in obtaining demographic information from Canadian general internists. J Clin Epidemiol 52:997–1005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R (2002) Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 324:1183–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, Grilli R, Harvey E, Oxman A, O’Brien MA (2001) Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 39:2–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the ICU nurses and physicians who participated in this survey. We are grateful for the help of Ellen McDonald, France Clarke, Catherine Vos and Cathy Hillsley for collating responses. This study was funded by the Father Sean O’Sullivan Research Center and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Cook.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMullin, J., Brozek, J., Jaeschke, R. et al. Glycemic control in the ICU: a multicenter survey. Intensive Care Med 30, 798–803 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2242-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2242-4

Keywords

Navigation