Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient literature searching: a core skill for the practice of evidence-based medicine

  • Review
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Efficient literature searching and the application of formal rules of evidence in evaluating the clinical literature are the two key skills defining the practice of evidence-based medicine. Although clinicians embrace the concepts of evidence-based medicine, most identify limited personal time as the major barrier towards its implementation into daily practice. Busy clinicians who practice evidence-based medicine identify systematic reviews and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as very useful resources.

Methods

This review presents a simple, easy-to-follow, three-step searching strategy that emphasises the use of powerful new PubMed features that allow clinicians to retrieve high-quality systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and primary studies with a single mouse click. The overall effectiveness of the process is further improved by highlighting the major features of successful and unsuccessful literature searches.

Conclusions

At the end of this tutorial the reader should be able to conduct efficient and effective literature searches that support clinical decision making in under 10 minutes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haynes R, McKibbon A, Fitzgerald D, Guyatt G, Walker C, Sackett D (1986) How to keep up with the medical literature. V. Access by personal computer to the medical literature. Ann Intern Med 105:810–824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Haynes R, McKibbon A, Walker C, Ryan N, Fitzgerald D, Ramsden M (1990) Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings: a study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med 112:78–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:2420–2425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clinicians for the Restoration of Autonomous Practice (CRAP) Writing Group (2002) EBM: unmasking the ugly truth. BMJ 325:1496–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shea S (2002) PubMed and me: why my coughs are more productive than my searches. Can Med Assoc J 167:1347–1348

    Google Scholar 

  6. McColl A, Smith H, White P, Field J (1998) General practitioners perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ 316:361–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Young J, Ward J (2001) Evidence-based medicine in general practice: beliefs and barriers amongst Australian GPs. J Eval Clin Pract 7:201–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sackett D (1997) So little time, and... Evid Based Med 2:39

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cook D, Meade M, Fink M (1996) How to keep up with the critical care literature and avoid being buried alive. Crit Care Med 24:1757–1768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith R, Chalmers I (2001) Britain's gift: a "Medline" of synthesised evidence: worldwide free access to evidence-based resources could transform health care. BMJ 323:1437–1438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kotzin S (2002) Medline and PubMed will be able to systhesise clinical data. BMJ 324:791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hersh W, Hickman D (1998) How well do physicians use electronic information retrieval systems? A framework for investigation and systematic review. JAMA 280:1347–1352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oxman A, Sackett D, Guyatt G, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1993) Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. JAMA 270:2093–2095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Richardson W, Wilson M, Nishikawa J, Hayward R (1995) The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 123:A12–A13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cook D, Sackett D, Spitzer W (1995) Methodological guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 48:167–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oxman A, Cook D, Guyatt G (1994) Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 272:1367–1371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shojania K, Bero L (2001) Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy. Eff Clin Pract 4:157–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cook D, Greengold N, Ellrodt A, Weingarten S (1997) The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 127:210–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. LeLorier J, Gregoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F (1997) Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 337:536–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Haynes R, Wilczynski N, McKibbon A, Walker C, Sinclair J (1994) Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1:447–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kingsland L, Harbourt A (1993) COACH: applying UMLS knowledge sources in an expert searcher environment. Bull Med Library Assoc 81:178–183

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hersh W, Crabtree M, Hickam D, Sacherek M, Friedman C, Tidmarsh P, Mosbaek C, Kraemer D (2002) Factors associated with success in searching Medline and applying evidence to answer clinical questions. J Am Informatics Assoc 9:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon Stuart Doig.

Additional information

This work was supported by unrestricted educational grants from ResMed and the Northcare Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doig, G.S., Simpson, F. Efficient literature searching: a core skill for the practice of evidence-based medicine. Intensive Care Med 29, 2119–2127 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1942-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1942-5

Keywords

Navigation