Abstract
Background
Symptomatic dysplasia of the hip represents an indication for a bony correction of the acetabulum. In the last decades several operative procedures were established.
Objective
The aim of the current study was to analyze whether the level of sports activity is higher in patients after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) according to Ganz as a technique which preserves the posterior column compared to classical triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO) for treatment of developmental hip dysplasia.
Material and methods
The study group included 102 patients treated with the classical TPO with already published clinical results, who were compared to 34 patients treated with PAO between 2012 and 2016. The clinical outcome scores included the modified Harris Hip Score, the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the University of California, Los Angeles activity score and the visual analog scale.
Results
After a mean follow-up of 4.4 years the clinical parameters improved significantly after PAO (p < 0.05). In comparison to the TPO group the clinical scores of the PAO group had inferior baseline values and a tendency to inferior follow-up results in the mHHS (p < 0.05) and HOOS (p > 0.05). After surgery, the PAO group showed a shift to medium and high impact sport activities.
Conclusion
The shorter time of postoperative partial weight bearing after PAO due to the preservation of the posterior column seemed not to have a positive impact on the clinical results or the sports activity compared to the TPO treated patients.
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Die symptomatische Hüftdysplasie des Erwachsenen bedarf in der Regel einer knöchernen Korrekturosteotomie, um die mechanische Kraftübertragung vom Azetabulum zum Femurkopf zu verbessern. Über die Zeit haben sich mehrere Operationstechniken etabliert.
Ziel der Arbeit
Das Ziel der Studie war es, das Aktivitätsniveau zwischen Patienten nach einer Tripel-Osteotomie (TPO) und einer periazetabulären Osteotomie (PAO) nach Ganz zu vergleichen. Ein wesentlicher Unterschied zwischen beiden Verfahren ist der Erhalt des hinteren Pfeilers bei der PAO.
Material und Methoden
Die Studiengruppe enthielt 102 Fälle, die mit der klassischen TPO behandelt worden waren und deren klinische Ergebnisse bereits publiziert wurden. Sie wurden mit 34 Patienten verglichen, die mit einer PAO bei symptomatischer Hüftdysplasie zwischen 2012 und 2016 versorgt worden waren. Die klinischen Bewertungsmaßstäbe umfassten den modifizierten Harris Hip Score (mHHS), den Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), die Aktivitätsskala der University of California Los Angeles und die Visuelle Analogskala.
Ergebnisse
Nach einem durchschnittlichen Beobachtungszeitraum von 4,4 Jahren zeigte sich eine signifikante Verbesserung in den Bewertungsmaßstäben nach durchgeführter PAO (p < 0,05). Im Vergleich zu der TPO-Gruppe zeigten die PAO-Patienten niedrigere Ausgangswerte in den Bewertungsmaßstäben und tendenziell niedrigere Ergebnisse im mHHS (p < 0,05) und HOOS (p > 0,05). Nach der Beckenumstellung zeigte sich ein Wechsel von Sportarten mit mittlerer Belastung zu Sportarten mit hoher Belastung.
Schlussfolgerung
Die kürzere Phase der Teilbelastung nach PAO aufgrund des Erhalts des hinteren Pfeilers scheint keinen positiven Einfluss auf die klinischen Ergebnisse oder die sportliche Aktivität im Vergleich zu Patienten mit TPO zu haben.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AA:
-
Acetabular angle
- DDH:
-
Developmental dysplasia of the hip
- HOOS:
-
Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
- LCEA:
-
Lateral center edge angle
- MHHS:
-
Modified Harris Hip Score
- PAO:
-
Periacetabular osteotomy
- ROM:
-
Range of motion
- THA:
-
Total hip arthroplasty
- TPO:
-
Triple pelvic osteotomy
- UCLA:
-
University of California, Los Angeles activity score
- VAS:
-
Visual analog scale
- WOMAC:
-
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
References
Bogunovic L, Hunt D, Prather H et al (2014) Activity tolerance after periacetabular osteotomy. Am J Sports Med 42:1791–1795
Clohisy JC, Ackerman J, Baca G et al (2017) Patient-reported outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy from the prospective ANCHOR cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:33–41
Ettinger M, Berger S, Floerkemeier T et al (2015) Sports activity after treatment of residual hip dysplasia with triple pelvic osteotomy using the Tonnis and Kalchschmidt technique. Am J Sports Med 43:715–720
Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS et al (1988) A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:26–36
Heyworth BE, Novais EN, Murray K et al (2016) Return to play after periacetabular osteotomy for treatment of Acetabular dysplasia in adolescent and young adult athletes. Am J Sports Med 44:1573–1581
Hoaglund FT, Steinbach LS (2001) Primary osteoarthritis of the hip: etiology and epidemiology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 9:320–327
Ito H, Tanino H, Sato T et al (2014) Early weight-bearing after periacetabular osteotomy leads to a high incidence of postoperative pelvic fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:234
Klein GR, Levine BR, Hozack WJ et al (2007) Return to athletic activity after total hip arthroplasty. Consensus guidelines based on a survey of the Hip Society and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty 22:171–175
Lerch TD, Steppacher SD, Liechti EF et al (2017) One-third of hips after periacetabular osteotomy survive 30 years with good clinical results, no progression of arthritis, or conversion to THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:1154–1168
Loder RT, Skopelja EN (2011) The epidemiology and demographics of hip dysplasia. ISRN Orthop 2011:238607
Maheshwari R, Madan SS (2011) Pelvic osteotomy techniques and comparative effects on biomechanics of the hip: a kinematic study. Orthopedics 34:e821–e826
Mavcic B, Iglic A, Kralj-Iglic V et al (2008) Cumulative hip contact stress predicts osteoarthritis in DDH. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:884–891
Okoroafor UC, Pascual-Garrido C, Schwabe MT et al (2019) Activity level maintenance at midterm follow-up among active patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy. Am J Sports Med 47:3455–3459
Petrie J, An T, Schoenecker P et al (2018) What is the impact of PAO surgery on patient function and activity levels? Orthop J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00150
Pfeifer R, Hurschler C, Ostermeier S et al (2008) In vitro investigation of biomechanical changes of the hip after Salter pelvic osteotomy. Clin Biomech 23:299–304
Pun S (2016) Hip dysplasia in the young adult caused by residual childhood and adolescent-onset dysplasia. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9:427–434
Steppacher SD, Lerch TD, Gharanizadeh K et al (2014) Size and shape of the lunate surface in different types of pincer impingement: theoretical implications for surgical therapy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 22:951–958
Takahashi Y, Takahira N, Uchiyama K et al (2020) Sports activity participation after curved periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21:637
Tönnis D, Behrens K, Tscharani F (1981) A modified technique of the triple pelvic osteotomy: early results. J Pediatr Orthop 1:241–249
Woodacre T, Ball T, Cox P (2016) Epidemiology of developmental dysplasia of the hip within the UK: refining the risk factors. J Child Orthop 10:633–642
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
N. Wirries, C. Posselt, M. Ettinger, A. Derksen, S. Budde, H. Windhagen and T. Floerkemeier declare that they have no competing interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was IRB approved by the local ethics committee (No. 3588).
Additional information
Scan QR code & read article online
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wirries, N., Posselt, C., Ettinger, M. et al. Sports activity after pelvic osteotomy for treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Orthopädie 51, 775–780 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-022-04249-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-022-04249-2
Keywords
- Dysplasia of the hip
- Hip preservation surgery
- Posterior column
- Periacetabular osteotomy
- Triple osteotomy