Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hüftpfannenersatz

Acetabular cup replacement

  • Update Orthopädie
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Adler E, Stuchin SA, Kummer FJ (1992) Stability of press-fit acetabular cups. J Arthroplasty 7(3):295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blankstein M, Lentine B, Nelms NJ (2020) The use of cement in hip arthroplasty: a contemporary perspective. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 28(14):e586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Charnley J (1961) Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation. Lancet 1(7187):1129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cupic Z (1979) Long-term follow-up of Charnley arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 28:141

    Google Scholar 

  5. Curtis MJ, Jinnah RH, Wilson VD, Hungerford DS (1992) The initial stability of uncemented acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(3):372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Effenberger H, Imhof M, Witzel U (2001) Thread design of screw-in acetabulum prostheses. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139(5):428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gwynne-Jones DP, Lash HWR, James AW, Iosua EE, Matheson JA (2017) The Morscher press-fit acetabular component: an independent long-term review at 18–22 years. J Arthroplasty 32(8):2444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Halder AM, Stiehler M, Günther K‑P (2012) Historie und Epidemiologie. In: Claes L, Kirschner P, Perka C, Rudert M (Hrsg) AE-Manual der Endoprothetik: Hüfte und Hüftrevision. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harris J, Lightowler CD, Todd RC (1972) Total hip replacement in inflammatory hip disease using the Charnley prosthesis. Br Med J 2(5816):750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ihle M, Mai S, Pfluger D, Siebert W (2008) The results of the titanium-coated RM acetabular component at 20 years: a long-term follow-up of an uncemented primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(10):1284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jenkins DR, Odland AN, Sierra RJ, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2017) Minimum five-year outcomes with porous tantalum acetabular cup and augment construct in complex revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(10):e49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuhn A, Scheller G, Schwarz M (1999) Primary stability of cement-free press-fit acetabulum cups. In vitro displacement studies. Biomed Tech (Berl) 44(12):356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Löchel J, Janz V, Hipfl C, Perka C, Wassilew GI (2019) Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J 101-B(3):311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mittelmeier H (1979) 68. Keramik-Tragrippen-Prothesen ohne Zement. Langenbecks Arch Chiv 349(1):315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morscher EW, Widmer KH, Bereiter H, Elke R, Schenk R (2002) Cementless socket fixation based on the “press-fit” concept in total hip joint arthroplasty. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 69(1):8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ring PA (1968) Complete replacement arthroplasty of the hip by the ring prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 50(4):720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sivash KM (1969) The development of a total metal prosthesis for the hip joint from a partial joint replacement. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 11:53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stefl MD, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Pedersen DR, Goetz DD, Johnston RC (2012) Primary cementless acetabular fixation at a minimum of twenty years of follow-up: a concise update of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(3):234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Streit MR, Weiss S, Andreas F, Bruckner T, Walker T, Kretzer JP, Ewerbeck V, Merle C (2014) 10-year results of the uncemented Allofit press-fit cup in young patients. Acta Orthop 85(4):368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Della Valle CJ, Mesko NW, Quigley L, Rosenberg AG, Jacobs JJ, Galante JO (2009) Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(5):1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Walters S, Prasad A, Guevel B, Sarraf KM, Achan P, Dawson-Bowling S, Millington S, Hanna SA (2019) Systematic review of the outcome of cemented versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty following pelvic irradiation. Musculoskelet Surg 103(3):221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wegrzyn J, Kaufman KR, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2015) Performance of porous tantalum vs. titanium cup in total hip arthroplasty: randomized trial with minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 30(6):1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Willert H‑G, Semlitsch M (1995) Was lehren uns 30 Jahre Erfahrung mit dem künstlichen Gelenkersatz? In: Morscher EW (Hrsg) Endoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  24. Willi R, Rieker C, Thomsen M, Thomas P (2012) Implantate. In: Claes L, Kirschner P, Perka C, Rudert M (Hrsg) AE-Manual der Endoprothetik: Hüfte und Hüftrevision. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 47–82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Witzel U, Rieger W, Effenberger H (2008) Three-dimensional stress analysis of threaded cups—a finite element analysis. Int Orthop 32(2):195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Reichel.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

H. Reichel und M. Fuchs geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reichel, H., Fuchs, M. Hüftpfannenersatz. Orthopäde 50, 832–834 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04146-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04146-0

Navigation