Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Indikation, Tipps und Tricks beim individualisierten Bikompartmentersatz

Indications, tips and tricks in individualized bicompartmental replacement

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body-Mass-Index

KOOS :

Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

KSS :

Knee Society Score

SF :

Short Form

TKA :

Knietotalendoprothese

UKA :

Unikondyläre Knieendoprothese

VAS :

Visuelle Analogskala

WOMAC :

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

Literatur

  1. Anon National Joint Registry 15th Annual Report 2018 Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP). https://www.hqip.org.uk/resource/national-joint-registry-15th-annual-report-2018/#.XmXiDEoxmCo

  2. Baker P, Jameson S, Critchley R, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan D (2013) Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:702–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beckmann J, Calgeer P, Rueth M, Huth J, Schnurr C, Beier A (2015) Bikompartimenteller vs. totalendoprothetischer Ersatz der Bikompartment-Gonarthrose – ein matched-pair Vergleich. 63 Jahreskongr. Ver. Süddtsch. Orthop. Unfallchirurgen EV Ver. Süddtsch. Orthop. Unfallchirurgen, Baden-Baden. Vortrag auf dem VSOU, Jahreskongress der Vereinigung Süddeutscher Orthoipäden und Unfallchirurgen

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beckmann J, Steinert AF, Huber B, Rudert M, Köck FX, Buhs M, Rolston L (2019) Customised bi-compartmental knee arthroplasty shows encouraging 3‑year results: findings of a prospective, multicenter study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05595-z

  5. Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Sheinkop MB, Valle DCJ, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (2004) The progression of patellofemoral arthrosis after medial unicompartmental replacement: results at 11 to 15 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res (428):92–99

  6. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop 468:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cobb J (2015) Arthroplasty registries, patient safety and outlier surgeons: the case for change. Acta Orthop Belg 81:594–599

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Genkinger M, Laass H, Rosenbaum D (2003) Proprioception with bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining cruciate ligaments. Clin Orthop Relat Res (406):148–154

  9. Heekin RD, Fokin AA (2014) Incidence of bicompartmental osteoarthritis in patients undergoing total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the time ripe for a less radical treatment? J Knee Surg 27:77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Isaac SM, Barker KL, Danial IN, Beard DJ, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2007) Does arthroplasty type influence knee joint proprioception? A longitudinal prospective study comparing total and unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee 14:212–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Konan S, Haddad FS (2016) Does location of patellofemoral chondral lesion influence outcome after Oxford medial compartmental knee arthroplasty? Bone Joint J 98:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW (2014) Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 384:1437–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrison TA, Nyce JD, Macaulay WB, Geller JA (2011) Early adverse results with bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort comparison to total knee arthroplasty. j Arthroplast 26:35–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Müller M, Matziolis G, Falk R, Hommel H (2012) The bicompartmental knee joint prosthesis Journey Deuce: failure analysis and optimization strategies. Orthopade 41:894–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ogura T, Le K, Merkely G, Bryant T, Minas T (2019) A high level of satisfaction after bicompartmental individualized knee arthroplasty with patient-specific implants and instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1487–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Temple MM, Bae WC, Chen MQ, Lotz M, Amiel D, Coutts RD, Sah RL (2007) Age- and site-associated biomechanical weakening of human articular cartilage of the femoral condyle. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 15:1042–1052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tria AJ (2013) Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the clinical outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am 44:281–286, vii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang H, Dugan E, Frame J, Rolston L (2009) Gait analysis after bi-compartmental knee replacement. Clin Biomech 24:751:754

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wünschel M, Lo J, Dilger T, Wülker N, Müller O (2011) Influence of bi- and tri-compartmental knee arthroplasty on the kinematics of the knee joint. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department Endoprothetik untere Extremität und Fußchirurgie, Sportklinik Stuttgart, Taubenheimstr. 8, 70372, Stuttgart, Deutschland

    M. Meier, R. Best &  J. Beckmann

  2. Klinikum Dortmund, Dortmund, Deutschland

    C. Lüring

  3. MedArtes, Neutraubling, Deutschland

    F. X. Köck

Authors
  1. M. Meier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Lüring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Best
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. X. Köck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Beckmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Beckmann.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Lüring gibt an Honorare von DePuy Synthes zu erhalten. J. Beckmann gibt an Honorare von Smith&Nephew und von ConforMIS zu erhalten. M. Meier, R. Best und F.X. Köck geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meier, M., Lüring, C., Best, R. et al. Indikation, Tipps und Tricks beim individualisierten Bikompartmentersatz. Orthopäde 49, 390–395 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-020-03902-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-020-03902-y

Search

Navigation