Advertisement

Der Orthopäde

, Volume 48, Issue 10, pp 810–815 | Cite as

Die lumbale Spinalkanalstenose

Eine historische Perspektive
  • T. RahimEmail author
  • J. M. Vinas Rios
  • M. Arabmotlagh
  • R. Sellei
  • M. Rauschmann
Leitthema

Zusammenfassung

Die Geschichte einer Erkrankung und deren Behandlung zu kennen, ist immer lehrreich und hilft, Zusammenhänge besser zu verstehen. Es zeigt auch, welche unglaublichen Vorleistungen notwendig waren, um Patienten heute in der für uns gewohnten Art zu behandeln. Dieser vorliegende Artikel versucht, die Spinalkanalstenose aus historischer Sicht zu beleuchten und diejenigen Wegbereiter zu benennen, die zum Verständnis der Epidemiologie, Anatomie, Pathogenese, Klassifikation und Diagnostik der Spinalkanalstenosen beigetragen haben. Darüber hinaus sind die Bemühungen von Wissenschaftlern und Klinikern zu würdigen, die in den letzten sieben Jahrzehnten an der Entwicklung der Therapie der lumbalen Spinalkanalstenose mitgewirkt haben.

Schlüsselwörter

Spinalkanalstenose Geschichte Henk Verbiest Herbert Junghans M. Gazi Yaşargil Claudicatio spinalis 

Abkürzungen

AWMF

Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften

BGU

Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik

LWS

Lendenwirbelsäule

SKS

Spinalkanalstenose

SL

Spondylolisthesis

Lumbar spinal canal stenosis

A historical perspective

Abstract

To know the history of a disease and its treatment is always instructive and helps us to understand the contexts better. It also shows what unbelievable preliminary work was necessary for us be able to treat patients today in the way we are used to. This article attempts to shed light on spinal canal stenosis from a historical perspective and to identify the pioneers who contributed to the understanding of the epidemiology, anatomy, pathogenesis, classification and diagnostic work-up of spinal canal stenosis. In addition, the efforts of scientists and clinicians who have participated in developing the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis in the last seven decades should be recognized.

Keywords

Spinal canal stenosis History Henk Verbiest Herbert Junghans M. Gazi Yaşargil Claudicatio spinalis 

Notes

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt

T. Rahim, J.M. Vinas Rios, M. Arabmotlagh, R. Sellei und M. Rauschmann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Arnoldi CC, Brodsky AE, Cauchoix J, Crock HV, Domnisse GF, Edgar MA, Gargano FP, Jacobson RE, Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Kurihara A, Langenskiöld A, Macnab I, McIvor GWD, Newman PH, Paine KWE, Russin LA, Sheldon J, Tile M, Urist MR, Wilson WE, Wiltse LL (1976) Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes. Definition and classification. Clin Orthop 115:4–5Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Patrick DL, Convery K, Keller RB, Singer DE (1996) The quebec task force classification for spinal disorders and the severity, treatment, and outcomes of sciatica and lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21(24):2885–2892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30:936–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benini A (1980) Sondylolisthesis und Ischias. Klinik und Therapie. Anhand 19 eigener Fälle. Neurochirurgie 23:167Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benini A (1986) Ischias ohne Bandscheibenvorfall. Die Stenose des lumbalen Wirbelkanals, 2. Aufl. Huber, Bern-Stuttgart-TorontoGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benini A (1989) Das lumbale Bandscheibenleiden und seine Folgen: segmentale Instabilität, Bandscheibenvorfall, lumbale Wirbelstenose. Wandel eines Volksleidens. Schweiz Rundsch 78:840–850Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benini A (1997) Die Stenose des lumbalen Wirbelkanals – Pathophysiologie, Klinik und Therapie. Orthopade 26:503–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cornefjord M, Byröd G, Brisby H, Rydevik B (2000) A long-term (4- to 12-year) follow-up study of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 9:563–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Craig W, McGhromley RK (1934) The significance and treatment of sciatic pain. JAMA 100:1143–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dejerine J (1911) Le claudicatio intermittante de la moelle epiniere. Presse Med 19:981–984Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Devlin DJ, Ogilvie JW, Transfeld EE (1991) Surgical treatment of neuropathic spinal arthropathy. J Spinal Disord 4(3):319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dick W, Widmer H (1993) Degenerative Lumbalskoliose und Spinalstenose. Orthopade 22:32–242Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ebeling U, Reulen HJ (1992) Neurochirurgische Behandlung der lumbalen Stenose. Nervenarzt 63:200–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elsberg S (1980) The trefoil configuration of the lumbar vertebral canal. A study of South African skeletal material. J Bone Joint Surg 62-B:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Epstein JA, Epstein BS, Lavine LS, Carras R, Rosenthal AD (1976) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with an intact neural arch, (pseudospondylolisthesis). J Neurosurg 44(2):139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fränkel J, Sachs B (1900) Progressive ankylotic rigidity of the spine (Spondylose rhizomelique). J Nerv Ment Dis 27(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garfin SR, Herkowitz HN, Mirkovic S (1999) Spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg 81-A:572–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Gelderen C (1948) Ein orthotisches (lordotisches) Kaudasyndrom. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand 23:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gibson JNA, Grant IC, Waddell G (1999) The Cochrane Review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Spine 20(17):1820–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grmek MD (1974) Die Wirbelsäule im Zeitgeschehen. Med Welt 30:70Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hall S, Bartelson JD, Onofrrio BM (1985) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical features, diagnostic procedures and results of surgical treatment in 68 patients. Ann Intern Med 103:271–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T (1993) Long-term results of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 18(11):1471–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T (1994) Computed tomography after Laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis—patients’ pain patterns, walking capacity, and subjektive disability had no correlation with computed tomography findings. Spine 19(17):1975–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T, Sihvonen T (1995) Surgical results of lumbar spinal stenosis—a comparison of patients with or without previous back surgery. Spine 20(8):964–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Herno A, Saari T, Suomalainen O, Airaksinen O (1999) The degree of dekompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24(10):1010–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Herron LD, Trippi AC (1989) L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis, the result of treatment by dekompressive laminectomie without fusion. Spine 5:534–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hohmann D, Krügelgen B, Liebig K, Schirmer M (1984) Neuroorthopädie Bd. 2. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Horsley V (1909) Chronic spinal meningitis. Br Med J 1:513–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Houndsfield G (1980) The quest for an image of the brain. Raw Press, New York, S 24 (Quoted by Oldendorf WH.)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Johnsson K‑E, Udén A, Rosén I (1991) The effect of decompression on the natural course of spinal stenosis—a comparison of surgically treated and untreated patients. Spine 16(6):615–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Junghans H (1930) Spondylolisthesen ohne Spalt im Zwischengelenkstück (Pseudospondylolisthesis). Arch Orthop Unfallchir 29:118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Junghans H (1980) Die Wirbelsäule in Forschung und Praxis Bd. 75. Hippokrates, Stuttgart (Nomenclatura columne vertebralis H. Junghans)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Wedge JH, Young-Hing K (1978) Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine 3:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Knoeller SM, Seifried C (2000) Historical perspective: history of spinal surgery. Spine 25:2838–2843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Krauss B (1990) Wirbelsäule und Bandscheiben (Kapitel 15). In: Lissner J, Seiderer M (Hrsg) Klinische Kernspintomographie. Enke Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lancourt J, Glenn WV, Wiltse LL (1979) Multiplanar computerized tomography in the normal spine and in the diagnosis of spinal stenosis. A gross anatomic-computerized tomography correlation. Spine 4:379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Love J, Camp J (1937) Root pain resulting from intraspinal protrusion of intervertebral diseas: diagnosis and surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg 19:776–804Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Marketos SG, Skiadas P (1999) Hippocrates: the father of the spine surgery. Spine 24:1381–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Marketos SG, Skiadas PK (1999) Galen: a pioneer of spine research. Spine 24:2358–2362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Markham JW (1967) Surgery of the spinal cord and vertebral column. In: Walker AE (Hrsg) A history of neurological surgery. Williams Sr Wilkins Co, Baltimore, S 364–392Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    McCulloch JA (1998) Microdecompression and uninstrumented single-level fusion for canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 23(20):2243–2252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Meyerding HW (1932) Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 54:371–377Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mixter WJ, Barr JS (1934) Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal kanal. N Engl J Med 211:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Newman PH (1963) The etiology of spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 45-B:39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Oppenheim H, Krause F (1909) Über Einklemmung bzw. Strangulation der Cauda equina. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 35:697–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Parker HL, Adson AW (1925) Compression of the spinal cord and ist roots by hyperatrophic oste-arthritis. Diagnosis and treatment. Surg Gynecol Obstet 41:1–14Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Portal A (1803a) Cours d’anatomie medicale on elements de l’anatomie de l’home Bd. 1. Bondoin, Paris, S 299Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Portal A (1803b) Cours d’anatomie medicale on elements de l’anatomie de l’homme Bd. 1. Bondoin, Paris, S 299Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Postacchini F (1989) Definition and classification. In: Postacchini F (Hrsg) Lumbar spinal Stenosis, 2. Aufl. Springer, Wien, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Postacchini F (1999) Spine update—surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24(10):1041–1047Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Perugia D, Gumina S (1993) The surgical treatment of central lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg 75-B:386–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Prère J, Manelfe C, Salvolini U (1992) Pathology of the neural arch, spinal stenoses, and spondylolisthesis (chapter 11). In: Imaging of the spine and spinal cord, Bd. 11. Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Putti V (1927) On new conceptions in the pathogenesis of sciatic pain. Lancet 210:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Putti V, Lagroscino D (1937/1938) Anatomia del lartrismo vertebrale apofisario. Chir Organi Mov 23:317Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sato K, Kikuchi S (1997) Clinical analysis of two-level compression of the Cauda Equina and the nerve roots in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 22(16):1898–1904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schmorl G (1931) Über die pathologischeAnatomie der Wirbelbandscheiben. Beitr Klin Chir 151:360–368Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schmorl G, Junghans H (1968) Die gesunde und die kranke Wirbelsäule im Röntgenbild und Klinik. Thieme, StuttartGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schröder S, Thurn P, Friedmann G (1983) Computertomographie d. Wirbelsäule und des Spinalkanals. Enke, Stuttgart, S 48Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Schulitz K‑P (1995) Das Risiko der Instabilität nach Dekompression der lumbalen Spinalstenose. Z Orthop Unfall 133:236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schulitz K‑P (1996) Die Lumbale Wirbelkanalstenose. Dtsch Arztebl 93(50):2592–2596Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sonntag VKH (1997) History of degenerative and traumatic disease of the spine. In: Greenblatt SH, Dagi T, Epstein M (Hrsg) A history of neurosurgery: in its scientific and p rofessional contexts. American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Park RidgeGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Spivak JM (1998) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg 80-A:1053–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Taillard W (1980) Klassifizierung der Spondylolisthesen. Z Orthop 118:429Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Thomé C (2009) In: Börm W, Meyer F (Hrsg) Spinale Neurochirurgie Operatives Management von Wirbelsäulenerkrankungen. Schattauer, Stuttgart, New York, S 83–89Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Thomé C, Börm W, Meyer F (2008) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis—current strategies in diagnosis and treatment (review article). Dtsch Ärztebl Int 105(20):373–379PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bäzner H, Pöckler-Schöniger C, Wöhrle J, Schmiedek P (2005) Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 3(2):129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Uhlenbrock D (2001) Radiologische Diagnostik – Kernspintomographie der Wirbelsäule und des Spinalkanals. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Verbiest H (1954) A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral kanal. J Bone Joint Surg 36-B:230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Verbiest H (1955) Further experiences on the pathological influence of a developmental narrowness of the bony lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg 37-B:576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Verbiest H (1963) Spondylolisthesis: the value of radicular signs and symptoms. A study based on surgical experience and treatment. J Int Coll Surg 39:461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Vitaz TW, Raque GH, Shields CB, Glassman SD (1999) Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients older tha 75 years of age. J Neurosurg 91(2):181–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yaşargil MG (1977) Microsurgical operation of herniated lumbar disc. In: Wüllenweber R, Brock M, Hamer J (Hrsg) Advances in neurosurgery. Springer, Berlin, S 74–77Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Rahim
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. M. Vinas Rios
    • 2
  • M. Arabmotlagh
    • 2
  • R. Sellei
    • 2
  • M. Rauschmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Neurochirurgische Gemeinschaftspraxis WiesbadenWiesbadenDeutschland
  2. 2.Sana Klinikum OffenbachOffenbachDeutschland

Personalised recommendations