Skip to main content
Log in

Komplikationen nach osteosynthetischer Versorgung von Azetabulumfrakturen

Complications after osteosynthetic treatment of acetabular fractures

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die frühen Arbeiten von Judet und Letournel in den 70er und 80er Jahren führten zu einem Paradigmenwechsel in der Behandlung von Azetabulumfrakturen – weg von der rein konservativen hin zur operativen Therapie. Die komplexe dreidimensionale knöcherne Anatomie und der periazetabuläre Weichteilmantel mit engem topographischem Bezug zu intra- und extrapelvinen neurovaskulären/viszeralen Strukturen implizieren eine erhöhte Rate sowie ein vergleichsweise erhöhtes Risiko intra- und postoperativer Komplikationen bei gleichzeitig bestehender Anforderung an eine sorgfältige anatomische Rekonstruktion mit einer Gelenkstufen-/spalttoleranz von weniger als 1–2 mm. Gleichzeitig sind Frakturen des Azetabulums vergleichsweise selten, sodass eigentlich nur entsprechende Zentren über die entsprechende Erfahrung sowie die Infrastruktur zur Versorgung von Azetabulumfrakturen verfügen. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es daher, die potenziellen intra- und postoperativen Komplikationen im Rahmen der operativen Versorgung von Azetabulumfrakturen darzustellen sowie praktische Ansätze zur Therapie und Prophylaxe aufzuzeigen.

Abstract

The early work of Judet and Letournel in the 1970s and 1980s led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of acetabular fractures. The previously purely conservative treatment was replaced more and more by open surgical approaches. The complex, three-dimensional bony anatomy and the periacetabular soft tissue with a close topographic relationship to intrapelvic and extrapelvic neurovascular and visceral structures implicate an increased rate as well as a high risk for intraoperative and postoperative complications. Simultaneously, anatomical reconstruction with a gap step-off less than 1–2 mm is required. Fractures of the acetabulum are comparatively rare and only few trauma centers have the capability and the infrastructure to treat acetabular fractures. Therefore, the aim of this review was to illustrate the possible intraoperative and postoperative complications of osteosynthetic treatment of acetabular fractures as well as to identify possible strategies for treatment and prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Arcasoy SM, Vachani A (2003) Local and systemic thrombolytic therapy for acute venous thromboembolism. Clin Chest Med 24:73–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Archdeacon MT, Kazemi N, Collinge C et al (2012) Treatment of protrusio fractures of the acetabulum in patients 70 years and older. J Orthop Trauma, in press

  3. Baker SP, O’neill B, Haddon W Jr et al (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14:187–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Borg T, Berg P, Larsson S (2012) Quality of life after operative fixation of displaced acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 26:445–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA et al (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 55:1629–1632

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chiu FY, Chen CM, Lo WH (2000) Surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures – 72 cases followed for 10 (6–14) years. Injury 31:181–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Collinge C, Archdeacon M, Sagi HC (2011) Quality of radiographic reduction and perioperative complications for transverse acetabular fractures treated by the Kocher-Langenbeck approach: prone versus lateral position. J Orthop Trauma 25:538-542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Copes WS, Champion HR, Sacco WJ et al (1988) The injury severity score revisited. J Trauma 28:69–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalen JE, Alpert JS, Hirsh J (1997) Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism: is it effective? Is it safe? When is it indicated? Arch Intern Med 157:2550–2556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Daum WJ, Scarborough MT, Gordon W Jr et al (1992) Heterotopic ossification and other perioperative complications of acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 6:427–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Ridder VA, De Lange S, Kingma L et al (1994) Results of 75 consecutive patients with an acetabular fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fishmann AJ, Greeno RA, Brooks LR et al (1994) Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in acetabular and pelvic fracture surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF et al (2008) Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133:381S–453S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghalambor N, Matta JM, Bernstein L (1994) Heterotopic ossification following operative treatment of acetabular fracture. An analysis of risk factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:96–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C et al (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 87:2–9

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gruen GS, Mears DC, Tauxe WN (1988) Distinguishing avascular necrosis from segmental impaction of the femoral head following an acetabular fracture: preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma 2:5–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hougaard K, Thomsen PB (1986) Traumatic posterior dislocation of the hip – prognostic factors influencing the incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 106:32–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Izrailtyan I, Clark J, Swaminathan M et al (2006) Case report: optimizing intraoperative detection of pulmonary embolism using contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Can J Anaesth 53:711–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jivan S, Kumar N, Wiberg M et al (2009) The influence of pre-surgical delay on functional outcome after reconstruction of brachial plexus injuries. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:472–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jivan S, Novikova LN, Wiberg M et al (2006) The effects of delayed nerve repair on neuronal survival and axonal regeneration after seventh cervical spinal nerve axotomy in adult rats. Exp Brain Res 170:245–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 46:1615–1646

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kebaish AS, Roy A, Rennie W (1991) Displaced acetabular fractures: long-term follow-up. J Trauma 31:1539–1542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lang T (2009) Diagnostic assessment of perioperative thromboembolism. Wien Med Wochenschr 159:492–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Letournel E (1980) Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 151:81–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Letournel E, Judet R (1993) Fractures of the acetabulum. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 541–543

  27. Letournel E, Judet R (1998) Fractures of the acetabulum. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  28. Lindberg M, Hole A, Johnsen H et al (2002) Reference intervals for procalcitonin and C-reactive protein after major abdominal surgery. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 62:189–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lippi G, Franchini M, Targher G et al (2008) Help me, doctor! My D-dimer is raised. Ann Med 40:594–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 78:1632–1645

    Google Scholar 

  31. Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC et al (1986) Fractures of the acetabulum. A retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:230–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mayo KA (1994) Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the acetabulum. Results in 163 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:31–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mayo KA, Letournel E, Matta JM et al (1994) Surgical revision of malreduced acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:47–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mears DC, Rubash HE, Sawaguchi T (1985) Fractures of the acetabulum. Hip 38:95–113

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mears DC, Velyvis JH, Chang CP (2003) Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Meisner M, Tschaikowsky K, Hutzler A et al (1998) Postoperative plasma concentrations of procalcitonin after different types of surgery. Intensive Care Med 24:680–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mohanty K, Taha W, Powell JN (2004) Non-union of acetabular fractures. Injury 35:787–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Oberhofer D, Rumenjak V, Lazic J et al (2006) Inflammatory indicators in patients after surgery of the large intestine. Acta Med Croatica 60:429–433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ochs BG, Marintschev I, Hoyer H et al (2010) Changes in the treatment of acetabular fractures over 15 years: analysis of 1266 cases treated by the German Pelvic Multicentre Study Group (DAO/DGU). Injury 41:839–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Osler T, Baker SP, Long W (1997) A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma 43:922–925 (discussion 925–926)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pape HC, Lehmann U, Van Griensven M et al (2001) Heterotopic ossifications in patients after severe blunt trauma with and without head trauma: incidence and patterns of distribution. J Orthop Trauma 15:229–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pavelka T, Houcek P (2009) Complications associated with the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 76:186–193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pavlou G, Kyrkos M, Tsialogiannis E et al (2012) Pharmacological treatment of heterotopic ossification following hip surgery: an update. Expert Opin Pharmacother 13:619–622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ragnarsson B, Jacobsson B (1992) Epidemiology of pelvic fractures in a Swedish county. Acta Orthop Scand 63:297–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Routt ML Jr, Swiontkowski MF (1990) Operative treatment of complex acetabular fractures. Combined anterior and posterior exposures during the same procedure. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:897–904

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rusu MC, Cergan R, Motoc AG et al (2010) Anatomical considerations on the corona mortis. Surg Radiol Anat 32:17–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schmidt-Rohlfing B, Reilmann H, Pape HC (2010) Fractures of the acetabulum. Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Unfallchirurg 113:217–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schröter F, Fitzek JM (2004) Einschätzungsempfehlungen für die private Unfallversicherung. Begutachtung der Haltungs- und Bewegungsorgane. Thieme, Stuttgart

  49. Stange R, Moser C, Hopfenmueller W et al (2012) Randomised controlled trial with medical leeches for osteoarthritis of the knee. Complement Ther Med 20:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stockle U, Hoffmann R, Sudkamp NP et al (2002) Treatment of complex acetabular fractures through a modified extended iliofemoral approach. J Orthop Trauma 16:220–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tscherne H, Pohlemann T (1998) Unfallchirurgie: Becken und Acetabulum. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  52. Zeichen J, Pohlemann T, Gansslen A et al (1995) Results of follow-up of surgical treatment of complicated acetabulum fractures with extended approaches. Unfallchirurg 98:361–368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. P. Schwabe, F. Wichlas, C. Druschel, C. Jacobs, N.P. Haas, K.-D. Schaser, S. Märdian geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Schwabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwabe, P., Wichlas, F., Druschel, C. et al. Komplikationen nach osteosynthetischer Versorgung von Azetabulumfrakturen. Orthopäde 43, 24–34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-013-2121-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-013-2121-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation