Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Proximale und distale Ruptur des M. biceps brachii

Proximal and distal rupture of the m. biceps brachii

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Rupturen der Bizepssehne stellen einen nicht unerheblichen Anteil der Sehnenrupturen dar. Proximale Rupturen der langen Bizepssehne sind eher degenerativen Ursprungs und treten häufig in Assoziation mit Rotatorenmanschettenläsionen auf. Die Beschwerden sind unspezifisch, nicht selten bestehen die Schulterbeschwerden schon länger. Die distale Bizepssehnenruptur wird dagegen fast immer durch eine plötzlich auf den angespannten Muskel einwirkende Kraft verursacht.

Klinisch imponiert die Distalisierung oder Proximalisierung des Muskelbauchs mit Hämatombildung. In Kombination mit klinisch spezifischen Tests und der weiterführenden Diagnostik gelingt in der Regel die Diagnose. Die Behandlungsoptionen sind sowohl konservativ, als auch operativ. Da die Ergebnisse der Tenotomie und Tenodese zur Therapie der proximalen Bizepssehnenruptur vergleichbar sind, ist die Therapie insbesondere bei älteren Patienten eher konservativ. Distale Rupturen dagegen werden in der Regel operativ versorgt. Die Ergebnisse der operativen Refixation sind sowohl für die proximale, als auch für die distale Bizepssehne vielversprechend. Chronische distale Rupturen werden aufgrund der Retraktion der Sehne mittels Auto- oder Allografts versorgt.

Abstract

Ruptures of the biceps tendon account for a high percentage of tendon ruptures. The aetiology of proximal ruptures of the long head of the biceps tendon is often degenerative and they are frequently associated with lesions of the rotator cuff. The clinical findings are often not specific and long lasting. Distal ruptures of the biceps tendon mostly occur during eccentric contraction of the biceps muscle.

Clinical tests, the associated haematoma and a distalisation or proximalisation of the muscle belly in combination with ultrasound or MRI to rule out combined diseases lead to the diagnosis. The possible options include conservative and operative treatment. Tenotomy and tenodesis lead to comparable results in the literature. Therefore, conservative treatment is mostly recommended in proximal ruptures. Operative treatment is preferred in distal ruptures of the biceps tendon in order to achieve an anatomical reconstruction of the muscle function. Chronic ruptures of the distal biceps tendon can be successfully treated with free autografts or allografts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Ahmad CS, DiSipio C, Lester J et al (2007) Factors affecting dropped biceps deformity after tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon. Arthroscopy 23:537–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldinger G, Wüst J (1979) Operative Behandlung der Bicepssehnenrupturen. Aktuelle Traumatol 3:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker DA, Cofield RH (1989) Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii for chronic bicipital tendinitis. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:376–381

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben KW, Sciascia AD, Hester P et al (2009) Clinical utility of traditional and new tests in the diagnosis of biceps tendon injuries and superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 37:1840–1847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett WF (1998) Specificity of the Speed’s test: arthroscopic technique for evaluating the biceps tendon at the level of the bicipital groove. Arthroscopy 14:789–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berlet GC, Johnson JA, Milne AD et al (1998) Distal biceps brachii tendon repair. An in vitro biomechanical study of tendon reattachment. Am J Sports Med 26:428–432

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Coste JS, Walch G (2002) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: a new technique using bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 18:1002–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brewer BJ (1979) Aging of the rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med 7:102–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chavan PR, Duquin TR, Bisson LJ (2008) Repair of the ruptured distal biceps tendon: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 36:1618–1624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Checchia SL, Doneux PS, Miyazaki AN et al (2005) Biceps tenodesis associated with arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:138–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Darlis NA, Sotereanos DG (2006) Distal biceps tendon reconstruction in chronic ruptures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:614–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dederich R (1984) Die Risse der Bizepssehnen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Schlüsselloch-Operation. Unfallheilkunde 87:13–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Drakos MC, Verma NN, Gulotta LV et al (2008) Arthroscopic transfer of the long head of the biceps tendon: functional outcome and clinical results. Arthroscopy 24:217–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards TB, Walch G (2003) Open biceps tenodesis: the interference screw technique. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:195–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Franceschi F, Longo UG, Ruzzini L et al (2008) No advantages in repairing a type II superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesion when associated with rotator cuff repair in patients over age 50: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 36:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Freeman CR, McCormick KR, Mahoney D et al (2009) Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures compared with a historical control group. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2329–2334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Froimson AI (1975) O I. Keyhold tenodesis of biceps origin at the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 245–249

  18. Frost A, Zafar MS, Maffulli N (2009) Tenotomy versus tenodesis in the management of pathologic lesions of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii. Am J Sports Med 37:828–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gill TJ, McIrvin E, Mair SD, Hawkins RJ (2000) Tenodesis versus release in the treatment of pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9(5):382–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gill TJ, McIrvin E, Mair SD, Hawkins RJ (2001) Results of biceps tenotomy for treatment of pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:247–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Golish SR, Caldwell PE III, Miller MD et al (2008) Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 24:1103–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gregory T, Roure P, Fontes D (2009) Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture using a suture anchor: description of a new endoscopic procedure. Am J Sports Med 37:506–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hawkins RJ, Shank J, Kissenberth MJ et al (2007) A comparison of forearm supination and elbow flexion strength in patients with either long head of the biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(2):64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Idler CS, Montgomery WH III, Lindsey DP et al (2006) Distal biceps tendon repair: a biomechanical comparison of intact tendon and 2 repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 34:968–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kelly AM, Drakos MC, Fealy S et al (2005) Arthroscopic release of the long head of the biceps tendon: functional outcome and clinical results. Am J Sports Med 33:208–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kettler M, Lunger J, Kuhn V et al (2007) Failure strengths in distal biceps tendon repair. Am J Sports Med 35:1544–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kilicoglu O, Koyuncu O, Demirhan M et al (2005) Time-dependent changes in failure loads of 3 biceps tenodesis techniques: in vivo study in a sheep model. Am J Sports Med 33:1536–1544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim SH, Yoo JC (2005) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using interference screw: end-tunnel technique. Arthroscopy 21:1405

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Klepps S, Hazrati Y, Flatow E (2002) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 18:1040–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Klonz A, Loitz D, Reilmann H (2003) Proximal and distal ruptures of the biceps brachii tendon. Unfallchirurg 106:755–763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Klonz A, Reilmann H (2000) Biceps tendon: diagnosis, therapy and results after proximal and distal rupture. Orthopade 29:209–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lemos SE, Ebramzedeh E, Kvitne RS (2004) A new technique: in vitro suture anchor fixation has superior yield strength to bone tunnel fixation for distal biceps tendon repair. Am J Sports Med 32:406–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Levy HJ, Mashoof AA, Morgan D (2000) Repair of chronic ruptures of the distal biceps tendon using flexor carpi radialis tendon graft. Am J Sports Med 28:538–540

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Santangelo S et al (2005) The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 21:1296–1306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mazzocca AD, Burton KJ, Romeo AA et al (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of 4 techniques of distal biceps brachii tendon repair. Am J Sports Med 35:252–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mazzocca AD, Rios CG, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2005) Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 21:896

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McFarland GB (1990) Entrapement syndromes. In: Evarts CM (Hrsg) Surgery of the musculosceletal system. Churchill Livingstone, New York

  38. Nord KD, Smith GB, Mauck BM (2005) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using suture anchors through the subclavian portal. Arthroscopy 21:248–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Driscoll SW, Goncalves LB, Dietz P (2007) The hook test for distal biceps tendon avulsion. Am J Sports Med 35:1865–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Osbahr DC, Diamond AB, Speer KP (2002) The cosmetic appearance of the biceps muscle after long-head tenotomy versus tenodesis. Arthroscopy 18:483–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ozalay M, Akpinar S, Karaeminogullari O et al (2005) Mechanical strength of four different biceps tenodesis techniques. Arthroscopy 21:992–998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pereira DS, Kvitne RS, Liang M et al (2002) Surgical repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures: a biomechanical comparison of two techniques. Am J Sports Med 30:432–436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Postacchini F, Ricciardi-Pollini PT (1977) Rupture of the short head tendon of the biceps brachii. Clin Orthop Relat Res 229–232

  44. Richards DP, Burkhart SS (2004) Arthroscopic-assisted biceps tenodesis for ruptures of the long head of biceps brachii: The cobra procedure. Arthroscopy 20(Suppl 2):201–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Richards DP, Burkhart SS (2005) A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques. Arthroscopy 21:861–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Safran MR, Graham SM (2002) Distal biceps tendon ruptures: incidence, demographics, and the effect of smoking. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:275–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Seiler JG III, Parker LM, Chamberland PD et al (1995) The distal biceps tendon. Two potential mechanisms involved in its rupture: arterial supply and mechanical impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:149–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sharma S, MacKay G (2005) Endoscopic repair of distal biceps tendon using an EndoButton. Arthroscopy 21:897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Spang JT, Weinhold PS, Karas SG (2006) A biomechanical comparison of EndoButton versus suture anchor repair of distal biceps tendon injuries. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:509–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Spier W (1992) Sehnenverletzungen. In: Jäger M, Wirth CJ (Hrsg) Praxis der Orthopädie. Thieme, Stuttgart New York

  51. Sutton KM, Dodds SD, Ahmad CS, Sethi PM (2010) Surgical treatment of distal biceps rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:139–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Uhthoff HK, Löhr J, Hammond I, Sakar K (1986) Ätiologie und Pathogenese von Rupturen der Rotatorenmanschette. Hefte Unfallheilkd 180:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  53. Visuri T, Lindholm H (1994) Bilateral distal biceps tendon avulsions with use of anabolic steroids. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26:941–944

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wiley WB, Meyers JF, Weber SC, Pearson SE (2004) Arthroscopic assisted mini-open biceps tenodesis: surgical technique. Arthroscopy 20:444–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wiley WB, Noble JS, Dulaney TD et al (2006) Late reconstruction of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures with a semitendinosus autograft technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:440–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wirth CJ, Carls J (2000) Pathology of acute and chronic tendon injuries. Orthopade 29:174–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Lorbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorbach, O., Kieb, M., Grim, C. et al. Proximale und distale Ruptur des M. biceps brachii. Orthopäde 39, 1117–1122 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-010-1687-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-010-1687-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation