Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vor- und Nachteile der winkelstabilen Plattenosteosynthese

Advantages and disadvantages of locked plating

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die winkelstabile Plattenosteosynthese gehört zu den neuesten Techniken der Plattenosteosynthese. Ihr Ziel ist es, während der Operation bei kleinstmöglichen Schnitten und unter Aufrechterhaltung der Blutversorgung des Knochens und des umgebenden Gewebes das geringstmögliche Trauma zu verursachen. Weiterhin soll Sorge dafür getragen werden, dass es nur zu einem möglichst geringen Kontakt zwischen Knochen und Implantat kommt.

Abstract

Locked plating is one of the most modern plating techniques, the aim of which is to achieve the smallest possible surgical trauma, small incisions, preserve blood supply to the bone and adjacent soft tissues, and to ensure a minimal bone-implant interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Allgöwer M, Ehrsam R, Ganz R et al (1969) Clinical experience with a new compression plate „DCP“. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 125:45–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brunner C, Weber BG (1982) Special techniques in internal fixation. Springer, Berlin

  3. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T et al (1997) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and vascularity: preliminary results of a cadaver injection study. Injury 28(Suppl 1):A7–A12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T et al (1999) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique? J Orthop Trauma 13(6):401–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frigg R (2001) Locking Compression Plate (LCP): An osteosynthesis plate based on the Dynamic Compression Plate and the Point Contact Fixator (PC-Fix). Injury 32(Suppl 2): 63–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frigg R (2003) Development of the locking compression plate. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B6–B10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frigg R, Appenzeller A, Christensen R et al (2001) The development of the distal femur less invasive stabilization system (LISS). Injury 32:SC24–SC31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gosling T, Schandelmaier P, Müller M et al (2005) Single lateral locked screw plating of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 439:207–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krettek C, Müller M, Miclau T (2001) Evolution of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the femur. Injury 32(Suppl 3):SC14–SC23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T et al (1997) Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury 28(Suppl 1):A20–A30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Markmiller M, Konrad G, Südkamp N (2004) Femur-LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures: are there differences in outcome and complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:252–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mast J, Jakob R, Ganz R (1989) Planning and reduction technique in fracture surgery. Springer, Heidelberg

  13. Perren SM (2002) Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(8):1093–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rüedi TP, Sommer C, Leutenegger A (1998) New techniques in indirect reduction of long bone fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 347:27–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schütz M, Müller M, Kääb M et al (2003) Less invasive stabilization system (LISS) in the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 70(2):74–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schütz M, Müller M, Krettek C et al (2001) Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury 32(Suppl 3):SC48–SC54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sommer C, Gautier E, Müller M et al (2003) First clinical results of the Locking Compression Plate (LCP). Injury 34(Suppl 2):B43–B54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stannard JP, Wilson TC, Volgas DA et al (2003) Fracture stabilization of proximal tibial fractures with the proximal tibial LISS: early experience in Birmingham, Alabama (USA). Injury 34(Suppl 1):A36–A42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wagner M (2003) General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B31–B42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner M, Frenk A, Frigg R (2004) New concepts for bone fracture treatment and the locking compression plate. Surg Technol Int 12:271–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner M, Frigg R (eds) (2006) AO manual of fracture management: internal fixators. Thieme, Stuttgart

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Wagner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, M. Vor- und Nachteile der winkelstabilen Plattenosteosynthese. Orthopäde 39, 149–159 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1520-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1520-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation