Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Frakturen des oberen Sprunggelenkes

Fractures of the upper ankle

  • CME - Weiterbildung - Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Verletzungen des oberen Sprunggelenkes sind häufigster Grund der Vorstellung in Notfallambulanzen. Die Erstbehandlung obliegt oft jungen ärztlichen Kollegen. Während der Verletzungsmechanismus banal erscheinen mag, können unzureichende Diagnostik und Therapie zu langer Arbeitsunfähigkeit und funktionellen Einschränkungen des Gelenkes führen. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es daher, eine umfassende Übersicht über Anatomie, Biomechanik, Unfallmechanismen, Diagnostik und Therapie der Frakturen des oberen Sprunggelenkes zu vermitteln.

Abstract

Upper ankle injuries are the most common reason for presentation in emergency departments. The initial treatment is often left in the hands of young clinical professionals. While the mechanism of injury might appear banal, insufficient diagnosis and treatment can lead to long periods of disability and functional impairment of the joint. Therefore, it is the aim of this work to provide a thorough understanding of the anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, diagnostic and operative procedures of ankle joint fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9

Literatur

  1. Alonso A, Khoury L, Adams R (1998) Clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury: reliability and prediction of return to function. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 27:276–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT et al (2003) Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ 326:417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beumer A (2007) Chronic instability of the anterior syndesmosis of the ankle. Acta Orthop Suppl 78:4–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brage ME, Bennett CR, Whitehurst JB et al (1997) Observer reliability in ankle radiographic measurements. Foot Ankle Int 18:324–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cotton F (1910) The ankle and foot. In: Cotton FJ (ed) Dislocations and joint-fractures. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 535–588

  6. Dattani R, Patnaik S, Kantak A et al (2008) Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:405–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H et al (1997) Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 18:693–698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Frick H (1978) Zur Entstehung, Klinik, Diagnostik und Therapie der isolierten Verletzung der tibiofibularen Syndesmose. Unfallheilkunde 81:542–545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grass R, Herzmann K, Biewener A, Zwipp H (2000) Verletzungen der unteren tibiofibularen Syndesmose. Unfallchirurg 103:520–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harper MC, Keller TS (1989) A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 10:156–160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB, Wheeler JH (1990) Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 10:325–330

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Joy G, Patzakis MJ, Harvey JP (1974) Precise evaluation of the reduction of severe ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:979–993

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim S, Huh YM, Song HT et al (2007) Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury of ankle: evaluation with contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state MR imaging. Radiology 242:225–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lauge-Hansen N (1950) Fractures of the ankle II: Combined experimental/surgical and experimental roentgenologic investigation. Arch Surg 60:957–985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mac Nealy GA, Rogers LF, Hernandez R, Poznanski AK (1982) Injuries of the distal tibial epiphysis: systematic radiographic evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 138:683–689

    Google Scholar 

  16. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R (1992) Manual der Osteosynthese. AO-Technik. Springer, Berlin

  17. Nielson JH, Gardner MJ, Peterson MG et al (2005) Radiographic measurements do not predict syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures: an MRI study. Clin Orthop (436):216–221

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oae K, Takao M, Naito K et al (2003) Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology 227:155–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paul B, Peters M, Ekkernkamp A (2004) Kompendium der medizinischen Begutachtung. Spitta, Balingen

  20. Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Grass R (2008) Sprunggelenkfrakturen. Unfallchirurg 111:421–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Seifert J, Matthes G, Hinz P et al (2003) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of distal tibia fractures in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 23:727–732

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Teitz CC, Harrington RM (1998) A biochemical analysis of the squeeze test for sprains of the syndesmotic ligaments of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 19:489–492

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Van den Bekerom MP, Haverkamp D, Kloen P (2009) Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of posterior malleolar fractures. A systematic review of the literature. J Trauma 66:279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Weber BG (1966) Verletzungen des oberen Sprunggelenkes. Aktuelle Probleme in der Chirurgie. Huber, Bern

  25. Wich M, Spranger N, Ekkernkamp A (2004) Intraoperative Bildgebung mit dem ISO C(3D). Chirurg 75:982–987

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wukich DK, Kline AJ (2008) The management of ankle fractures in patients with diabetes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1570–1578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Sauerbruchstraße, 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland

    M. Frank & A. Ekkernkamp

  2. Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    M. Frank, K. Bauwens & A. Ekkernkamp

  3. Fusszentrum Bern, Bern, Schweiz

    K. Bauwens

Authors
  1. M. Frank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Bauwens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Ekkernkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Frank.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frank, M., Bauwens, K. & Ekkernkamp, A. Frakturen des oberen Sprunggelenkes. Orthopäde 38, 981–996 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1497-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1497-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation