Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tumoren des Bewegungsapparats

Bedeutung der morphologischen Diagnostik

Musculoskeletal tumors

Significance of morphological diagnostics

Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Zusammenfassung

Tumoren des Bewegungsapparats, insbesondere Knochentumoren, sind sehr selten. Ihre Diagnostik und Behandlung ist nur in einem interdisziplinären Konzept möglich und setzt umfangreiche Erfahrungen bei allen beteiligten Ärzten voraus. Die definitive histologische Diagnose darf nicht ohne Kenntnis des Alters, der genauen Lokalisation und der radiologischen Befundmuster gestellt werden. Neben der morphologischen Diagnose müssen auch Anforderungen an zusätzliche Untersuchungsverfahren (Molekularbiologie) bei der Planung der Biopsie berücksichtigt werden.

Abstract

Musculoskeletal tumors, particularly bone neoplasms, are very rare. Diagnosis and treatment require an interdisciplinary concept as well as wide experience of all physicians involved. The final histopathologic diagnosis should not be confirmed without information regarding the patient’s age, exact localization, and radiological findings. The requirements of additional diagnostic procedures (molecular pathology) have to be taken into consideration when planning a biopsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7

Literatur

  1. Aboulafia AJ, Schkrohowsky JG (2006) Musculoskeletal tumor biopsy: I. Choosing the appropriate method. Am J Orthop 35: 60–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aboulafia AJ, Schkrohowsky JG (2006) Musculoskeletal tumor biopsy: II. Choosing the appropriate technique. Am J Orthop 35: 121–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alman BA, Greel DA, Wolfel DA (1996) Activating mutations of Gs protein in monostotic fibrous lesions of bone. J Orthop Res 14: 311–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernd L, Zeifang F, Ludwig K et al (2005) Telekommunikation und Telepathologie in der orthopädischen Onkologie. Onkologie 11: 1177–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bridge RS, Rajaram V, Dehner LP et al (2006) Molecular diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor in routinely processed tissue: A comparison of two FISH strategies and RT-PCR in malignant round cell tumors. Mod Pathol 19: 1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruns J, Delling G, Henne-Bruns D et al (2008) Die Biopsie bei Tumoren des muskuloskeletalen Systems. Dtsch Ärzteblatt 105: 492–497

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruns J, Yazigee O, Werner M et al (2006) Bioptische Sicherung muskuloskelettaler Tumoren. Onkologie 12: 119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Delling G, Werner M, Bernd L et al (2002) Telekommunikation und Telepathologie. Neue Wege in der Diagnostik für Orthopädie und orthopädische Pathologie. Pathologe 23: 327–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. den Heeten GJ, Oldhoff J, Oosterhuis JW et al (1985) Biopsy of bone tumours. J Surg Oncol 28: 247–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Desmaze C, Brizard F, Turc-Carel C et al (1997) Multiple chromosomal mechanisms generate an EWS/FLI1 or an EWS/ERG fusion gene in Ewing tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 97: 12–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dockhorn-Dworniczak B, Schäfer KL, Dantcheva R et al (1994) Diagnostic value of the molecular genetic detection of the t(11;22) translocation in Ewing’s tumors. Virchows Arch 425: 107–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Khoury GY, Terepka RH, Mickelson MR et al (1983) Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65: 522–525

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Freyschmidt J, Ostertag H, Jundt G (1998) Knochentumoren. Klinik, Radiologie, Pathologie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  14. Gil-Sanchez S, Marco-Domenech SF, Irurzun-Lopez J et al (2001) Ultrasound-guided skeletal biopsies. Skeletal Radiol 30: 615–619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harms D (1995) New entities, concepts, and questions in childhood tumor pathology. Gen Diagn Pathol 141: 1–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jelinek JS, Kransdorf MJ, Gray R et al (1996) Percutaneous transpedicular biopsy of vertebral body lesions. Spine 21: 2035–2040

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lodwick GS (1965) A probabilistic approach to the diagnosis of bone tumors. Radiol Clin North Am 3: 487–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lodwick GS, Wilson AJ, Farrell C et al (1980) Estimating rate of growth in bone lesions: Observer performance and error. Radiology 134: 585–590

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mankin HJ, Mankin CJ, Simon MA (1996) The hazards of the biopsy, revisited. Members of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78: 656–663

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Markel DC, Neumann KU, Steinau HU (1994) Appropriate techniques for musculoskeletal tumor biopsy. Orthop Rev 23: 176–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mercuri M, Picci P, Campanacci L et al (1995) Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 24: 409–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Möller G, Kothe R, Wiesner L et al (2001) Fluoroscopy-guided transpedicular trocar biopsy of the spine. Results, review, and technical notes. Acta Orthop Belg 67: 488–499

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagao K, Ito H, Yoshida H et al (1997) Chromosomal rearrangement t(11;22) in extraskeletal, Ewing’s sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumour analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization using paraffin-embedded tissue. J Pathol 181: 62–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ozerdemoglu RA, Thompson RC Jr, Transfeldt EE et al (2003) Diagnostic value of open and needle biopsies in tumors of the sacrum. Spine 28: 909–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Perdigao PF, Pimenta FJ, Castro WH et al (2004) Investigation of the GSalpha gene in the diagnosis of fibrous dysplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33: 498–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pollandt K, Engels C, Kaiser E et al (2001) Gsα gene mutations in monostotic fibrous dysplasia of bone and fibrous dysplasia-like low-grade central osteosarcoma. Virchows Arch 439: 170–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rezanko T, Sucu HK, Akkalp A et al (2008) Is it possible to start the treatment based on immediate cytologic evaluation of core needle biopsy of the spinal lesions? Diagn Cytopathol 36: 478–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Simon MA (1982) Biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64: 1253–1257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Simon MA, Biermann JS (1993) Biopsy of bone and soft-tissue lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75: 616–621

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Simon MA, Finn HA (1993) Diagnostic strategy for bone and soft-tissue tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75: 622–631

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Skrzynski MC, Biermann JS, Montag A et al (1996) Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78: 644–649

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Staals EL, Bacchini P, Bertoni F (2006) Dedifferentiated central chondrosarcoma. Cancer 106: 2682–2691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weinstein LS, Shenker A, Gejman PV et al (1991) Activating mutaions of the stimulatory G protein in the McCune-Albright syndrome. N Engl J Med 325: 1688–1695

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Welkerling H, Dreyer T, Delling G (1991) Morphological typing of chondrosarcoma: A study of 94 cases. Virchows Arch 418: 419–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Werner M, Delling G (2000) Pathohistologie maligner Knochentumoren. Erfahrungen des Hamburger Knochentumorregisters an 8879 Fällen. Onkologe 8: 709–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Werner M, Delling G (2004) Chemotherapieinduzierte Veränderungen bei hochmalignen zentralen Osteosarkomen. Erfahrungen aus der referenzpathologischen Tätigkeit in den COSS-Studien. Pathologe 25: 445–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenskonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Pathologie, Orthopädische Pathologie – Referenzzentrum, HELIOS-Klinikum Emil von Behring, Walterhöferstraße 11, 14165, Berlin, Deutschland

    M. Werner

  2. Sarkomzentrum Berlin-Brandenburg, Berlin, Deutschland

    M. Werner

  3. Institut für Pathologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland

    K. Hauptmann

  4. Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland

    C.H. Lohmann

  5. Orthopädische Klinik, Klinikum, Bad Bramstedt, Deutschland

    C.H. Lohmann

  6. Institut für Pathologie, Knochentumor-Referenzzentrum, Universitätsspital, Basel, Schweiz

    G. Jundt

Authors
  1. M. Werner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Hauptmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C.H. Lohmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Jundt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Werner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Werner, M., Hauptmann, K., Lohmann, C. et al. Tumoren des Bewegungsapparats. Orthopäde 38, 546–556 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-008-1395-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-008-1395-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

search

Navigation