Skip to main content

Weichteildefekte als Komplikation nach Knieendoprothetik

Operative Strategien zur Weichteilrekonstruktion

Soft tissue defects as a complication in knee arthroplasty

Surgical strategies for soft tissue reconstruction

Der Orthopäde volume 35, pages 162–168 (2006)Cite this article

Zusammenfassung

Weichteildefekte nach Knieendoprothetik stellen ein schwerwiegendes Problem dar, sodass sogar die Prothese oder das gesamte Bein gefährdet sein können. Sorgfältig geplante Strategien sind für eine suffiziente Defektdeckung notwendig, die ein möglichst optimales funktionelles und ästhetisches Ergebnis gewährleisten.

Der vorliegende Beitrag erläutert die Stadieneinteilung der Weichteildefekte und stadienangepasste Möglichkeiten der operativen Sanierung. Neben den für alle Stadien gleichen grundlegenden Therapieprinzipien der Ruhigstellung, des Débridements, der programmierten Lavage und der Antibiotikatherapie stehen heutzutage sämtliche operativen Mittel der rekonstruktiven Chirurgie zur Verfügung. Dazu zählen die Hauttransplantation, lokale fasziokutane Verschiebelappen, gestielte lokale Muskellappenplastiken und freie Lappenplastiken. Für den optimalen Erfolg ist folglich ein interdisziplinäres Regime von Orthopäden, Plastischen Chirurgen, Mikrobiologen und Physiotherapeuten notwendig.

Abstract

Soft tissue defects after knee arthroplasty are a severe problem, which can even result in a loss of the prosthesis or the limb. Well-planned strategies are necessary for sufficient soft tissue reconstruction, resulting in optimal functional and aesthetic results.

This report provides information on the classification of the tissue defects and the appropriate options for surgical reconstruction. Besides the basic therapy principles of immobilisation, débridement, planned lavages and antibiotic therapy, defect-dependent surgical techniques of reconstructive surgery are implemented. These include skin transplantation, local fasciocutaneous flaps, local pedicled muscle flaps and free flaps. For best results, interdisciplinary treatment by orthopaedic surgeons, plastic surgeons, microbiologists and physiotherapists is mandatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Arnold PG (1985) Vastus medialis myocutaneus and myocutaneus-tendinous composite flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 75: 685

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexiades M, Sands A, Craig SM, Scott WN (1989) Management of selected problems in revision knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 20: 211–219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruner S, Jester A, Sauerbier M, Germann G (2004) Use of a cross-over arteriovenous fistula for simultaneous microsurgical tissue transfer and restoration of blood flow to the lower extremity. Microsurgery 24: 114–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buechel FF (2004) The infected total knee arthroplasty: just when you thought it was over. J Arthroplasty 19: 51–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandrasekhar B, Brien W (1993) Coverage strategies in total joint replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 24: 523–529

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cormack GC, Lamberty BG (1984) A classification of fascio-cutaneous flaps according to their patterns of vascularisation. Br J Plast Surg 37: 80–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Erler K, Neumann U, Anders C et al. (2003) Nachuntersuchungsergebnisse mittels EMG-Mapping — 5 Jahre nach Knieprothesenimplantation. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141: 48–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardetto A, Raschner C, Schoeller T, Pavelka ML, Wechselberger G (2005) Rectus femoris muscle flap donor-site morbidity. Br J Plast Surg 58: 175–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerwin M, Rothaus KO, Windsor RE, Brause BD, Insall JN (1993) Gastrocnemius muscle flap coverage of exposed or infected knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286: 64–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallock GG (1990) Salvage of total knee arthroplasty with local fasciocutaneous flaps. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72: 1236–1239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayashi A, Maruyama Y (1990) The lateral genicular artery flap. Ann Plast Surg 24: 310–317

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayashi A, Maruyama Y (1990) The medial genicular artery flap. Ann Plast Surg 25: 174–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hong JP, Lee HB, Chung YK, Kim SW, Tark KC (2003) Coverage of difficult wounds around the knee joint with prefabricated, distally based sartorius muscle flaps. Ann Plast Surg 50: 484–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson DP, Bannister GC (1986) The outcome of infected arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68: 289–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. König A, Kirschner S (2003) Langzeitergebnisse in der Knieendoprothetik. Orthopäde 32: 516–526

  16. Laing JH, Hancock K, Harrison DH (1992) The exposed total knee replacement prosthesis: a new classification and treatment algorithm. Br J Plast Surg 45: 66–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Z, Liu K, Lin Y, Li L (1990) Lateral sural cutaneous artery island flap in the treatment of soft tissue defects at the knee. Br J Plast Surg 43: 546–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mathes SJ, Nahai F (1981) Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles. Experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 67: 177–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathes SJ, Alpert BS, Chang N (1982) Use of the muscle flap in chronic osteomyelitis: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 69: 815–829

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Menderes A, Demirdover C, Yilmaz M, Vayvada H, Barutcu A (2002) Reconstruction of soft tissue defects following total knee arthroplasty. Knee 9: 215–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Petty CT, Hogue RJ Jr (1978) Closure of an exposed knee joint by use of a sartorius muscle flap: case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 62: 458–461

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pico R, Luscher NJ, Rometsch M, de Roche R (1991) Why the denervated gastrocnemius muscle flap should be encouraged. Ann Plast Surg 26: 312–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ponten B (1981) The fasciocutaneous flap: its use in soft tissue defects of the lower leg. Br J Plast Surg 34: 215–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Recalde Rocha JF, Gilbert A, Masquelet A, Yousif NJ, Sanger JR, Matloub HS (1987) The anterior tibial artery flap: anatomic study and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 79: 396–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rorabeck CH (2002) Salvage of the infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 404: 113–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Satoh K, Fukuya F, Matsui A, Onizuka T (1989) Lower leg reconstruction using a sural fasciocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 23: 97–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shaw AD, Ghosh SJ, Quaba AA (1998) The island posterior calf fasciocutaneous flap: an alternative to the gastrocnemius muscle for cover of knee and tibial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 101: 1529–1536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stark WJ (1946) The use of pedicled muscle flaps in the surgical treatment of chronic osteomyelitis resulting from compound fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 28: 343–350

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tsai CC, Lin SD, Lai CS, Chou CK, Lin TM (1995) Reconstruction of the upper leg and knee with a reversed flow saphenous island flap based on the medial inferior genicular artery. Ann Plast Surg 35: 480–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen. Die Präsentation des Themas ist unabhängig und die Darstellung der Inhalte produktneutral.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, München

    L. Kovacs, A. Zimmermann, C. Taskov, N. A. Papadopulos & E. Biemer

  2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, München

    P. Juhnke

  3. Abteilung für Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München

    L. Kovacs

Authors
  1. L. Kovacs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Zimmermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Juhnke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Taskov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. A. Papadopulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E. Biemer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Kovacs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kovacs, L., Zimmermann, A., Juhnke, P. et al. Weichteildefekte als Komplikation nach Knieendoprothetik. Orthopäde 35, 162–168 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-005-0909-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-005-0909-3

Schlüsselwörter

  • Knieendoprothetik
  • Weichteildefekte
  • Protheseninfektion
  • Lappenplastiken

Keywords

  • Knee arthroplasty
  • Soft tissue defects
  • Prosthesis infection
  • Flaps