Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Indikation zur Lymphknotendissektion beim Peniskarzinom

  • Published:
Der Urologe B

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Bernardo N, Scorticati C Jr, Holst P, Soldano M, De-Lasa T, Suarez P, Lopez M, Bencardino F, Sotero-Falco E, Coste-Delvecchio F, Rendon F (1996) Treatment of the regional lymph nodes in squamous carcinoma of the penis. Arch Esp Urol 49: 813–818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cabanas RM (1977) An approach for the treatment of penile cancer. Cancer 39: 450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Catalona WJ (1988) Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of saphenous veins: technique and preliminary results. J Urol 140: 306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colberg JW, Andriole GL, Catalona WJ (1997) Long-term follow-up of men undergoing modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis. Br J Urol 79: 54–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fowler JE (1984) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging penile cancer. Urology 23: 352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Horenblas S, van Tinteren H, Delemarre JF, Boonen LM, Lustig V, Kräger R (1991) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: acfcuracy of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system, and role of lymphangiography, computerized tomography scan and fine needle aspiration cytology. J Urol 146: 1279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Horenblas S, van Tinteren H, Delemarre JF, Moonen LM, Lustig V, van Waardenburg EW (1993) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. III. Treatment of regional lymph nodes. J Urol 149: 492–497

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lopes A, Rossi BM, Fonseca FP, Morini S (1996) Unreliability of modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for clinical staging of penile carcinoma. Cancer 77: 2099–2102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopes A, Hidalgo GS, Kowalski LP, Torloni H, Rossi BM, Fonseca FP (1996) Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of 145 patients treated with amputation and lymphadenectomy. J Urol 156: 1637–1642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McDougal WS (1995) Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol 77: 154, 1364

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parra RO (1996) Accurate staging of carcinoma of the penis in men with nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes by modified inguinal lymphadenectomy. J Urol 155: 560–563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ravi R (1993) Correlation between the extent of nodal involvement and survival following groin dissection for carcinoma of the penis. Br J Urol 72: 817–819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ravi R (1993 a) Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma. Br J Urol 72: 941–945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravi R (1993 b) Prophylactic lymphadenectomy vs observation vs inguinal biopsy in node-negative patients with invasive carcinoma of the penis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 23: 53–58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sohn M (1992) Der gegenwärtige Stellenwert der Lymphadenektomie beim Peniskarzinom. Urologe [A] 31: 206–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Solsona E, Iborra I, Ricos JV, Monros JL, Dumont R, Casanova J, Calabuig C (1992) Corpus cavemosum invasion and tumor grade in the prediction of lymph node condition in penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 22: 115–118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Theodorescu- D, Russo P, Zhang ZFF, Morash- C, Fair WR (1966) Outcomes of initial surveillance of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and negative nodes. J Urol 155: 1626–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wespes E (1986) Cabanas approach: is sentinel node biopsy reliable for staging penile carcinoma? Urology 28: 278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Univers.-Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, FU Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12200, Berlin

    K. Miller

Authors
  1. K. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, K. Indikation zur Lymphknotendissektion beim Peniskarzinom. Der Urologe B 37, 478–479 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001310050126

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001310050126

Search

Navigation