Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Operative Therapie der Endometriose und ihre Risiken

Surgical treatment of endometriosis and associated risks

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die operative Therapie stellt eine der Hauptsäulen der Endometriosebehandlung dar. Operationen werden insbesondere bei Schmerzen und Sterilität durchgeführt und führen zu Schmerzlinderung, teilweise auch zu erhöhter Fertilität. Erläutert wird die operative Therapie bei Adenomyosis, peritonealer Endometriose, tief infiltrierender Endometriose und ovarieller Endometriose. Dabei werden die Effekte der Operation auf Schmerzen und Fertilität sowie Rezidive und Risiken diskutiert. Bei Adenomyosis kommen organerhaltende Verfahren und die Hysterektomie zum Einsatz. Bei peritonealer Endometriose wird die Komplettresektion angestrebt, bei tief infiltrierender Endometriose symptomorientierte Komplettresektion. Hierfür kommen zum Teil hochkomplexe Eingriffe mit erhöhtem Komplikationspotenzial zum Einsatz. Bei der ovariellen Endometriose wird die komplette Zystektomie angestrebt. Dabei sind ovarielle Funktion und Kinderwunsch zusätzlich zu beachten. Endometrioseoperationen sind zumindest kurz- bis mittelfristig effektiv hinsichtlich von Schmerzsymptomen. Sie erhöhen die Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Spontankonzeption. Ihre Rolle im Rahmen der assistierten Reproduktion ist noch unklar. Die Indikationsstellung zur Operation sollte daher stets individuell erfolgen. Die Behandlung sollte insbesondere bei tief infiltrierender Endometriose in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen.

Abstract

Surgery is one of the main pillars of treatment of endometriosis. Operations are particularly carried out in cases of pain and sterility and lead to alleviation of pain and in some cases also to increased fertility. This article discusses the surgical treatment of adenomyosis, peritoneal endometriosis, deep infiltrating endometriosis and ovarian endometriosis. The effects of operations on pain, fertility, recurrences and risks are discussed. In cases of adenomyosis organ-preserving procedures and hysterectomy can be used. Peritoneal endometriosis is treated by complete resection and deep infiltrating endometriosis by symptom-oriented complete resection. This sometimes involves highly complex interventions with an increased risk of complications. In cases of ovarian endometriosis, a complete cystectomy is strived for. In these cases, ovarian function and desire for children must also be taken into consideration. Operations for endometriosis are effective against pain symptoms, at least in the short-term or mid-term. They also increase the probability of spontaneous conception. The role of surgery in assisted reproduction is still unclear. The indications for surgery should therefore always be assessed on an individual basis. These operations should be performed in specialized centers, especially in cases of deep infiltrating endometriosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Mikos T, Lioupis M, Anthoulakis C, Grimbizis GF (2019) The outcome of fertility-sparing and Nonfertility-sparing surgery for the treatment of adenomyosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynaecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Osada H (2018) Uterine adenomyosis and adenomyoma: the surgical approach. Fertility Steril 109(3):406–417

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neis KJ, Zubke W, Römer T, Schwerdtfeger K, Schollmeyer T, Rimbach S, Holthaus B, Solomayer E, Bojahr B, Neis F, Reisenauer C, Gabriel B, Dieterich H, Runnebaum IH, Kleine W, Strauss A, Menton M, Mylonas I, David M, Horn LC, Schmidt D, Gaß P, Teichmann AT, Brandner P, Stummvoll W, Kuhn A, Müller M, Fehr M, Tamussino K (2016) Indications and route of hysterectomy for benign diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG, SGGG (S3 level, AWMF registry No 015/070, April 2015) (2016). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 76(4):350–364

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin M, Bourdon M, Lafay-Pillet MC, Millischer AE, Streuli I, Borghese B, Petraglia F, Santulli P (2017) Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod 32(7):1393–1401

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Balat A, De Wilde RL, Schmeil I, Tahmasbi-Rad M, Bogdanyova S, Fathi A, Becker S (2017) Modern myoma treatment in the last 20 years: a review of the literature. Hindawi Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4593875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siedentopf F, Radnai D, Kentenich H (2015) Leitlinie Chronischer Unterbauchschmerz der Frau. S2k Niveau, AWMF Register Nr. 016/001

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li JJ, Chung JPW, Wang S, Li T‑C, Duan H (2018) The investigation and management of adenomyosis in women who wish to improve or preserve fertility. Biomed Res Int 2018:6832685

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Riley KA, Benton AS, Deimling TA, Kunselman AR, Harkins GJ (2019) Surgical excision versus ablation for superficial endometriosis-associated pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 26:71–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Knabben L, Imboden S, Fellmann B, Nirgianakis K, Kuhn A, Mueller MD (2015) Urinary tract endometriosis in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis: prevalence, symptoms, management, and proposal for a new clinical classification. Fertil Steril 103(1):147–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Ceccarello M, De Mitri P, Roviglione G, Mautone D, Caleffi G, Molinari A, Ruffo G, Cavalleri S (2019) Total laparoscopic bladder resection in the management of deep endometriosis: “take it or leave it.” Radicality versus persistence. Int Urogynecol J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04107-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Ferrero S, Candiani M, Somigliana E, Vigano’ P, Vercellini P (2017) Bladder endometriosis: a systematic review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, impact on fertility, and risk of malignant transformation. Eur Urol 71(5):790–807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Antonelli A, Simeone C, Zani D, Sacconi T, Minini G, Canossi E, Cosciani Cunico S (2006) Clinical aspects and surgical treatment of urinary tract endometriosis: our experience with 31 cases. Eur Urol 49(6):1093–1098

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Perez MPU, Bazan AA, Dorrego JMA, Hernandez A, de Francisco MG, Hernandez MM, de Santiago J, de la Pena BJ (2009) Urinary tract endometriosis: clinical diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Urology 73(1):47–51

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fuentes Pastor J, Ballestero DR, Correas Gomez MA, Torres Dıez E, Fernandez Florez A, Ballesteros Olmos G, Gutierrez Banos JL (2014) Bladder endometriosis and endocervicosis: presentation of 2 cases with endoscopic management and review of literature. Case Rep Urol 2014(4):296908–296914

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar S, Tiwari P, Sharma P, Goel A, Singh J, Vijay M, Gupta S, Bera MK, Kundu AK (2012) Urinary tract endometriosis: Review of 19 cases. Urol Ann 4(1):6–8

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Barra F, Scala C, Biscaldi E, Vellone VG, Ceccaroni M, Terrone C, Ferrero S (2018) Ureteral endometriosis: a systematic review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, risk of malignant transformation and fertility. Hum Reprod Update 24(6):710–730

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mereu L, Gagliardi ML, Clarizia R, Mainardi P, Landi S, Minelli L (2010) Laparoscopic management of ureteral endometriosis in case of moderate-severe hydroureteronephrosis. Fertil Steril 93:46–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ceccaroni M, Ceccarello M, Caleffi G, Clarizia R, Scarperi S, Pastorello M, Molinari A, Ruffo G, Cavalleri S (2018) Total laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy for ureteral endometriosis: a single-center experience of 160 consecutive patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Berlanda N, Vercellini P, Carmignani L, Aimi G, Amicarelli F, Fedele L (2009) Ureteral and vesical endometriosis. Two different clinical entities sharing the same pathogenesis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64:830–838

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maccagnano C, Pellucchi F, Rocchini L, Ghezzi M, Scattoni V, Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Colombo R (2013) Ureteral endometriosis: proposal for a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm with a review of the literature. Urol Int. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maggiore ULR, Ferrero S, Candiano M, Somigliana E, Vigano P, Vercellini P (2017) Bladder endometriosis: a systematic review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, impact on fertility and risk of malignant transformation. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Angioni S, Cela V, Sedda F, Stochino Loi E, Cofelice V, Pontis A, Melis GB (2015) Focusing on surgery results in infertile patients with deep endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2015.1062868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chopin N, Vieira M, Borghese B, Foulot H, Dousset B, Coste J, Mignon A, Fauconnier A, Chapron C (2005) Operative management of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: results on pelvic pain symptoms according to a surgical classification. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(2):106–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ford J, English J, Miles WA, Giannopoulos T (2004) Pain, quality of life and complications following the radical resection of rectovaginal endometriosis. BJOG 111(4):353–356

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Keckstein J, Ulrich U, Kandolf O, Wiesinger H, Wustlich M (2003) Laparoscopic therapy of intestinal endometriosis and the ranking of drug treatment. Zentralbl Gynakol 125(7–8):259–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Minelli L, Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Ruffo G, Ceccaroni M, Mereu L, Landi S, Pomini P, Scambia G (2009) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for bowel endometriosis: feasibility, complications, and clinical outcome. Arch Surg 144(3):234–239 (discussion 239)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Possover M, Diebolder H, Plaul K, Schneider A (2000) Laparascopically assisted vaginal resection of rectovaginal endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 96(2):304–307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D’Hooghe TM (2012) Clinical outcome after laparoscopic radical excision of endometriosis and laparoscopic segmental bowel resection. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 24(4):245–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Darai E, Dubernard G, Coutant C, Frey C, Rouzier R, Ballester M (2010) Randomized trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open colorectal resection for endometriosis: morbidity, symptoms, quality of life, and fertility. Ann Surg 251(6):1018–1023

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Touboul C, Ballester M, Dubernard G, Zilberman S, Thomin A, Darai E (2015) Long- term symptoms, quality of life, and fertility after colorectal resection for endometriosis: extended analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopically assisted to open surgery. Surg Endosc 29(7):1879–1887

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, Wolthuis A, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Laenen A, Penninckx F, Vergote I, D’Hoore A, D’Hooge T (2014) Clinical outcome after radical excision of moderate-severe endometriosis with or without bowel resection and reanastomosis: a pro-spective cohort study. Ann Surg 259(3):522–531

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roman H, Abo C, Huet E, Bridoux V, Auber M, Oden S, Marpeau L, Tuech JJ ( (2015) Full-thickness disc excision in deep endometriotic nodules of the rectum: a prospective cohort. Dis Colon Rectum 58(10):957–966

    Google Scholar 

  33. Daraı E, Lesieur B, Dubernard G, Rouzier R, Bazot M, Ballester M (2011) Fertility after colorectal resection for endometriosis: results of a prospective study comparing laparoscopy with open surgery. Fertil Steril 95(6):1903–1908

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vercellini P, Consonni D, Dridi D, Bracco B, Frattaruolo MP, Somigliana E (2014) Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Hum Reprod 29(5):964–977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. De Cicco C, Corona R, Schonman R, Mailova K, Ussia A, Koninckx P (2011) Bowel resection for deep endometriosis: a systematic review. BJOG 118(3):285–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D’Hoore A, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Penninckx F, Vergote I, D’Hooghe T (2011) Surgical treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement. Hum Reprod Update 17(3):311–326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kondo W, Bourdel N, Tamburro S, Cavoli D, Jardon K, Rabischong B, Botchorishvili R, Pouly J, Mage G, Canis M (2011) Complications after surgery for deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis. BJOG 118(3):292–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pereira RM, Zanatta A, Preti CD, de Paula FJ, da Motta EL, Serafini PC (2009) Should the gynecologist perform laparoscopic bowel resection to treat endometriosis? Results over 7 years in 168 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(4):472–479

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Roman H, Rozsnayi F, Puscasiu L, Resch B, Belhiba H, Lefebure B, Scotte M, Michot F, Marpeau L, Tuech JJ (2010) Complications associated with two laparoscopic procedures used in the management of rectal endometriosis. JSLS 14(2):169–177

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lermann J, Topal N, Adler W, Hildebrandt T, Renner SP, Beckmann MW, Burghaus S (2018) Major and minor complications after resection without bowel resection for deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298(5):991–999

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Afors K, Centini G, Fernandes R, Murtada R, Zupi E, Akladios C, Wattiez A (2016) Segmental and discoid resection are preferential to bowel shaving for medium-term symptomatic relief in patients with bowel endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(7):1123–1129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Roman H, Moatassim-Drissa S, Marty N, Milles M, Vallee A, Desnyder E, Stochino Loi E, Abo C (2016) Rectal shaving for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a 5-year continuous retrospective series. Fertil Steril 106(6):1438–1445.e2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Roman H, FRIENDS group (French coloRectal Infiltrating ENDometriosis Study group) (2017) A national snapshot of the surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum and colon in France in 2015: a multicenter series of 1135 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 46(2):159–165

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mohr C, Nezhat FR, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat CR (2005) Fertility considerations in laparoscopic treatment of infiltrative bowel endometriosis. JSLS 9(1):16–24

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Abrao MS, Petraglia F, Falcone T, Keckstein J, Osuga Y, Chapron C (2015) Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update 21(3):329–339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Armengol-Debeir L, Savoye G, Leroi AM, Gourcerol G, Savoye-Collet C, Tuech JJ, Vassilieff M, Roman H (2011) Pathophysiological approach to bowel dysfunction after segmental colorectal resection for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod 26(9):2330–2335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ballester M, Chereau E, Dubernard G, Coutant C, Bazot M, Darai E (2011) Urinary dysfunction after colorectal resection for endometriosis: results of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopy to open surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(4):303.e1–303.e6

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zilberman S, Ballester M, Touboul C, Chereau E, Sebe P, Bazot M, Darai E (2013) Partial colpectomy is a risk factor for urologic complications of colorectal resection for endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(1):49–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Boesgaard-Kjer D, Kjer JJ (2017) Primary umbilical endometriosis (PUE). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 209:44–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Horton JD, Dezee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, Wagner M (2008) Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon’s perspective and review of 445 cases. Am J Surg 196(2):207–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bektas H, Bilsel Y, Sari YS, Ersöz F, Koc O, Deniz M, Bortan B, Huq GE (2010) Abdominal wall endometrioma: a10-yearexperience and brief review of the literature. J Surg Res 164(1):e77–e81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ding Y, Zhu J (2013) A retrospective review of abdominal wall endometriosis in Shanghai, China. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 121(1):41–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gil Y, Tulandi T (2019) Diagnosis and treatment of catamenial pneumothorax: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pathak S, Caruana E, Chowdhry F (2019) Should surgical treatment of catamenial pneumothorax include diaphragmatic repair? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivz205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nezhat C, Lindheim SR, Backhus L, Vu M, Vang N, Nezhat A, Nezhat C (2019) Thoracic endometriosis syndrome: a review of diagnosis and management. JSLS 23(3):e2019.00029. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2019.00029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Haga T, Kurihaga M, Katahoka H, Ebana H (2014) Clinical-pathological findings of catamenial pneumothorax: comparison between recurrent cases and non-recurrent cases. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20(3):202–206

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Alifano M, Trisolini R, Cancellieri A, Regnard JF (2006) Thoracic endometriosis: current knowledge. Ann Thorac Surg 81(2):761–769

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Redwine DB (2002) Diaphragmatic endometriosis: diagnosis, surgical management, and long-term results of treatment. Fertil Steril 77(2):288–296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ceccaroni M, Roviglione G, Giampaolini P, Clarizia R, Bruni F, Ruffo G, Patrelli TS, De Placido G, Minelli L (2013) Laparoscopic surgical treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis: a 7-year single-institution retrospective review. Surg Endosc 27(2):625–632

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Channabasavaiah AD, Joseph JV (2010) Thoracic endometriosis: revisiting the association between clinical presentation and thoracic pathology based on thoracoscopic findings in 110 patients. Medicine 89(3):183–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Joseph J, Sahn SA (1996) Thoracic endometriosis syndrome: new observations from an analysis of 110 cases. Am J Med 100(2):164–170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Possover M, Schneider T, Henle KP (2011) Laparoscopic therapy for endometriosis and vascular entrapment of sacral plexus. Fertil Steril 95(2):756–758

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Possover M (2009) Laparoscopic management of endopelvic etiologies of pudendal pain in 134 consecutive patients. J Urol 181(4):1732–1736

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Possover M, Chiantera V (2007) Isolated infiltrative endometriosis of the sciatic nerve: a report of three patients. Fertil Steril 87(2):417.e17–417.e19

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Alboni C, Ruffo G, Bruni F, Roviglione G, Scioscia M, Peters I, De Placido G, Minelli L (2010) Laparoscopic nerve-sparing transperitoneal approach for endometriosis infiltrating the pelvic wall and somatic nerves: anatomical considerations and surgical technique. Surg Radiol Anat 32(6):601–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hart RJ, Hickey M, Maouris P, Buckett W (2008) Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004992.pub3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Iwase A, Nakamura T, Nakahara T, Goto M, Kikkawa F (2014) Assessment of ovarian reserve using anti-Müllerian hormone levels in benign gynecological conditions and surgical interventions: a systemativ narrative review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 12:125

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Moscarini M, Milazzo GM, Assorgi C, Pacchiarotti A, Caserta D (2014) Ovarian stripping versus cystectomy: recurrence of endometriosis and pregnancy rate. Arch Obstet Gynecol 290(1):163–167

    Google Scholar 

  69. Deckers P, Conti Ribeiro S, Dos Santos Simoes R, Bariao da Fonseca Miyahara C, Chada Baracat E (2017) Systematic review and metaanalysis of the effectof bipolar electrocoagulation during laparoscopic ovarian endometrioma stripping on ovarian reserve. Int J Gynecol Obstet 140(1):11–17

    Google Scholar 

  70. Keyhan S, Hughes C, Price T, Muasher S (2015) An update on surgical versus expectant management of ovarian endometriomas in infertile women. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/204792

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Brink Laursen J, Schroll JB, Macklon KT, Rudnicki M (2017) Surgery versus conservative management of endometriomas in subfertile women. A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 96(6):727–735

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Tao X, Chen L, Ge S, Cai L (2017) Weigh the pros and cons to ovarian reserve before stripping ovarian endometriomas prior to IVF/ICSI: a meta analysis. PLoS ONE 12(6):e177426

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, D’Hooghe T, Dunselman G, Greb R, Hummelshoj L, Prentice A, Saridogan E, ESHRE special interest group for endometriosis and endometrium guideline development group (2005) ESHRE Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 20(10):2698–2704

    Google Scholar 

  74. Coccia ME, Rizzello F, Barone S, Pinelli S, Rapalini E, Parri C, Caracciolo D, Papageorgiou S, Cima G, Gandini L (2014) Is there a critical endometrioma size associated with reduced ovarian responsiveness in assisted reproduction techniques? Reprod Biomed Online 29(2):259–266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Rubod C, Jean dit Gautier E, Yazbeck C (2018) Surgical management of endometrioma: different alternatives in term of pain, fertility and recurrence. CNGOF-HAS endometriosis guidelines. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 46(3):278–289

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Perlman S, Kjer JJ (2016) Ovarian damage due to cyst removal: a comparison between endometriomas and dermoid cysts. Acta Obstet Gyncol Scand 95(3):285–290

    Google Scholar 

  77. Kwon SK, Kim SH, Yun S‑C, Kim DY, Chae HD, Kim C‑H, Kang BM (2014) Decline of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in endometrioma and other benign cysts: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 101(2):435–441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Muzii L, Achilli C, Bergamini V, Candiani M, Garavaglia E, Lazzeri L, Lecce F, Maiorana A, Maneschi F, Marana R, Perandini A, Porpora MG, Seracchioli R, Spagnolo E, Vignali M, Benedetti Panici P (2016) Comparison between the stripping technique and the combined excisional/ablative technique for the treatment of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a multicenter RCT. Hum Reprod 31(2):339–344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhang C‑H, Wu L, Li P‑Q (2016) Clinical study of the impact on ovarian reserve by different hemostasis methods in laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 55(4):507–511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Asgari Z, Rouholamin S, Hosseini R, Sepidarkish M, Hafizi L, Javaheri A (2016) Comparing ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of endometriotic cysts and hemostasis achieved either by bipolar coagulation or suturing: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gyn Obstet 293(5):1015–1022

    Google Scholar 

  81. Muzii L, Achilli C, Lecce F, Bianchi A, Franceschetti S, Marchetti C, Perniola G, Benedetti Panici P (2015) Fertil Steril 103(3):738–743

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Giampaolino P, Corte DL, Saccone G, Vitagliano A, Bifulco G, Calagna G, Carugno J, Di Spiezo Sardo A (2019) Role of ovarian suspension in preventing postsurgical ovarian adhesions in patients with stage III–IV pelvic endometriosis: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 26(1):53–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland

    Sebastian D. Schäfer

Authors
  1. Sebastian D. Schäfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian D. Schäfer.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

S.D. Schäfer gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden vom Autor keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Redaktion

L. Kiesel, Münster

W. Janni, Ulm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schäfer, S.D. Operative Therapie der Endometriose und ihre Risiken. Gynäkologe 53, 671–682 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-020-04646-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-020-04646-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation