Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Minimal-invasive Operationen beim Endometriumkarzinom

Minimally invasive operations for endometrial cancer

  • Gynäkologie aktuell
  • Published:
Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Mäenpää MM, Nieminen K, Tomás EI et al (2016) Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215:588.e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM et al (2012) Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol 30:695–700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kornblith AB, Huang HQ, Walker JL et al (2009) Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 27:5337–5342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Janda M, Gebski V, Davies LC et al (2017) Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage I endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 317:1224–1233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM et al (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27:5331–5336

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Janda M, Gebski V, Brand A et al (2010) Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 11:772–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Galaal K, Bryant A, Fisher AD et al (2012) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF) Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge der Patientinnen mit Endometriumkarzinom, Langversion 1.0, 2018, AWMF Registernummer: 032/034-OL. http://www.leitlinienprogrammonkologie.de/leitlinien/endometriumkarzinom/. Zugegriffen: 14. Jan. 2020

  9. Holloway RW, Patel SD, Ahmad S (2009) Robotic surgery in gynecology. Scand J Surg 98:96–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lauterbach R, Matanes E, Lowenstein L (2017) Review of robotic surgery in gynecology—the future is here. Rambam Maimonides Med J 8:e19

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Paley PJ, Veljovich DS, Shah CA et al (2011) Surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology in the era of robotics: analysis of first 1000 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:551.e1–551.e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ran L, Jin J, Xu Y et al (2014) Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Plos One 9:e108361

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Park DA, Lee DH, Kim SW et al (2016) Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:1303–1314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET et al (2012) Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:783–791

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jørgensen SL, Mogensen O, Wu C et al (2019) Nationwide introduction of minimally invasive robotic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer and its association with severe complications. JAMA Surg 154:530–538

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jørgensen S, Mogensen O, Wu CS et al (2019) Survival after a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery in women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a population-based prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 109:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Shepherd A, Momeni M et al (2014) Survival analysis of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210:160.e1–160.e11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kilgore JE, Jackson AL, Ko EM et al (2013) Recurrence-free and 5‑year survival following robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 129:49–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Salehi S, Åvall-Lundqvist E, Legerstam B et al (2017) Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 79:81–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rossi EC, Kowalski LD, Scalici J et al (2017) A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol 18:384–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Höckel M (2015) Morphogenetic fields of embryonic development in locoregional cancer spread. Lancet Oncol 16:e148–e151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kimmig R, Iannaccone A, Aktas B et al (2016) Embryologically based radical hysterectomy as peritoneal mesometrial resection (PMMR) with pelvic/paraaortic lymphadenectomy for loco-regional tumour control in endometrial cancer—first evidence for efficacy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:153–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kimmig R, Aktas B, Buderath P et al (2016) Intraoperative navigation in robotically assisted compartmental surgery of uterine cancer by visualisation of embryologically derived lymphatic networks with indocyanine-green (ICG). J Surg Oncol 113:554–559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ind T, Laios A, Hacking M et al (2017) A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 13:e1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xie W, Cao D, Yang J et al (2016) Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clinic Oncol 142:2173–2183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ind T, Laios A, Hacking M et al (2017) A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot 13:e1851

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Leitao MM Jr, Briscoe G, Santos K et al (2012) Introduction of a computerbased surgical platform in the surgical care of patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer: Outcomes and impact on approach. Gynecol Oncol 125:394–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sandadi S, Gadzinski JA, Lee S et al (2014) Fellowship learning curve associated with completing a robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 132:102–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Barrie A, Freeman AH, Lyon L et al (2016) Classification of postoperative complications in robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:1181–1188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ind TEJ, Marshall C, Hacking M et al (2017) The effect of obesity on clinical and economic outcomes in robotic endometrial cancer surgery. Robot Surg Res Rev 2017:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chan JK, Gardner AB, Taylor K et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients—a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates. Gynecol Oncol 139:300–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Corrado G, Vizza E, Cela V et al (2018) Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:1935–1941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland

    Pawel Mach & Rainer Kimmig

Authors
  1. Pawel Mach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rainer Kimmig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pawel Mach.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

P. Mach und R. Kimmig geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Redaktion

T. Fehm, Düsseldorf

L. Kiesel, Münster

R. Kimmig, Essen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mach, P., Kimmig, R. Minimal-invasive Operationen beim Endometriumkarzinom. Gynäkologe 53, 547–551 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-020-04600-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-020-04600-8

Search

Navigation