Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hysterektomie – operative Innovationen in der Gynäkologie am Beispiel einer „alten“ Operation

Hysterectomy—sugical innovations in gynecology exemplified by an “old” operation

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die Geschichte der Hysterektomie ist lang, und die Hysterektomie ist die weltweit am häufigsten durchgeführte gynäkologische Operation. Entsprechende operative Fähigkeiten und Methoden, ausgehend von klassischen Operationstechniken der vaginalen und der abdominellen Hysterektomie, haben im Laufe der Zeit enorme Weiterentwicklungen erfahren. Der vorliegende Beitrag zeichnet den geschichtlichen Werdegang der Hysterektomie nach, führt die heutigen Operationsverfahren der Hysterektomie bei benignen Erkrankungen auf und erläutert wichtige Aspekte bei der Wahl der heutigen Operationsverfahren.

Abstract

The history of hysterectomy is long and hysterectomy is the most frequently performed gynecological operation worldwide. Appropriate operative capabilities and methods, based on classical operation techniques of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy, have experienced an enormous further development during the course of time. This article reconstructs the historical development of hysterectomy, describes the current operative procedure of hysterectomy for benign diseases and illustrates important aspects in the selection of the currently used operative procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Sutton C (1997) Hysterectomy: A historical perspective. Baillière’s Clin Obstet Gynaecol 11:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3552(97)80047-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Semm K (1989) Changing from laparotomy to minimal invasive surgery: pelviscopy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 245(1–4):19–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reich H (2007) Totale laparoscopic hysterectomy: indicationa, techniques and outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(4):337–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Donnez J, Nisolle M (1993) Laparoscopic supracervical (subtotal) hysterectomy (LASH). J Gynecol Surg 9(2):91–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baggish MS (2005) Total and subtotal abdominal hysterectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19:333–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wehner K, Wrede S, Rüppel F, Bundesfachgruppe Gynäkologie AQUA-Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen (2012) Qualitätsreport 2012, S 128–134

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prütz F, von der Lippe E (2014n) Hysterektomie. GBE kompakt 5(1). Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin (www.rki.de/gbe-kompakt (Stand: 06.02.2014))

    Google Scholar 

  8. David M, Wild D, Wernecke K‑D, Siedentopf F (2012) Attitudes toward mode of hysterectomy: a survey-based study among German gynecologists. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 164:216–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Indication and technics of hysterectomy for benign disease. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (AWMF Registry No. 015/077, March 2015). http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/015-070.html n. d.

  10. Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol B, Kluivers K (2015) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brummer TH, Jalkanen J, Fraser J, Heikkinen AM, Kauko M, Mäkinen J, Seppälä T, Sjöberg J, Tomas E, Härkki P (2011) FINHYST, a prospective study of 5279 hysterectomies: complications and their risk factors. Hum Reprod 26:1741–1751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R et al (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, Townsend C Jr (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 16(9):1271–1273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Steinhilber B, Seibt R, Reiff F, Rieger MA, Kraemer B, Rothmund R (2016) Effect of a laparoscopic instrument with rotatable handle piece on biomechanical stress during laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 30:78–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Albright BB, Witte T, Tofte AN, Chou J, Black JD, Desai VB et al (2016) Robotic versus Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:18–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dorsey JH, Steinberg EP, Holtz PM (1995) Clinical indications for hysterectomy route: patient characteristics or physician preference? Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1452–1460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown J (2014) AAGL advancing minimally invasive gynecology worldwide: statement to the FDA on power morcellation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:970–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017) Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Committee Opinion No. 701. Obstet Gynecol 129:e155–159

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lethaby A, Mukhopadhyay A, Naik R (2012) Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004993.pub3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pölcher M, Hauptmann S, Fotopoulou C, Schmalfeldt B, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Mustea A, Runnebaum I, Sehuli J (2015) Should fallopian tubes be removed during hysterectomy procedures? – a statement by AGO Ovar. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 75:339–341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Matteson KA, Abed H, Wheeler TL, Sung VW, Rahn DD, Schaffer JI, Balk EM (2012) A systematic review comparing hysterectomy with less-invasive treatments for abnormal uterine bleeding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19:13–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kluivers KB, Johnson NP, Chien P, Vierhout ME, Bongers M, Mol BWJ (2008) Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 136:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kives S, Lefebvre G, Wolfman W, Leyland N, Allaire C, Awadalla A, Best C, Leroux N, Potestio F, Rittenberg D, Soucy R, Singh S (2010) Supracervical hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32:62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitätsfrauenklinik Ulm, Prittwitzstr. 43, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland

    Emanuel Bauer, Christoph Scholz, Fabienne Schochter, Nikolaus De Gregoriod, Wolfgang Janni &  Peter Widschwendter

Authors
  1. Emanuel Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christoph Scholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fabienne Schochter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nikolaus De Gregoriod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wolfgang Janni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peter Widschwendter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Emanuel Bauer or Peter Widschwendter.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

E. Bauer, C. Scholz, F. Schochter, N. DeGregorio, W. Janni und P. Widschwendter geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

H. Ludwig, Basel

K. Diedrich, Hamburg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauer, E., Scholz, C., Schochter, F. et al. Hysterektomie – operative Innovationen in der Gynäkologie am Beispiel einer „alten“ Operation. Gynäkologe 51, 755–763 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-018-4307-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-018-4307-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation