Zusammenfassung
Die Erhaltungstherapie ist ein relevanter Bestandteil der Behandlung von Patientinnen mit metastasierten gynäkologischen Malignomen. Beim metastasierten Ovarialkarzinom gehört der Angiogenesehemmer (AI) Bevacizumab zur Standardtherapie in der Primär- und Rezidivsituation sowie sowohl beim platinsensiblem als auch beim platinresistentem Rezidiv. Der Multikinasehemmer Sorafenib stellt in der Kombination mit Topotecan eine zwar nicht zugelassene, aber wirksame Therapieoption bei platinresistentem Rezidiv dar. Als besonders wirkungsvoll wird der Einsatz des PARP-Inhibitors Olaparib beim platinsensiblem Rezidiv für BRCA-mutierte Patientinnen mit metastasiertem Ovarialkarzinom angesehen. Weitere, viel versprechende PARP-Inhibitoren (Rucaparib, Niraparib) sowie Kombinationen aus den AI Cediranib oder Bevacizumab und PARP-Inhibitor Olaparib werden in Studien erforscht und sind nicht zugelassen. Der AI Bevacizumab ist auch bei metastasiertem Zervixkarzinom Bestandteil der klinischen Routine, sogar mit einem signifikant positiven Einfluss auf das OS. Eine Immuntherapie mit Checkpoint-Inhibitoren (Atezolizumab, Pembrolizumab, Avelumab) bei metastasierten Ovarial- und Zervixkarzinomen ist derzeit Gegenstand intensiver klinischer Studien, die vielleicht in naher Zukunft eine neue Therapieperspektive in den metastasierten Situationen eröffnen könnte.
Abstract
Maintenance therapy is an important component in the treatment of patients with metastatic gynecological tumors. The angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab belongs to the standard therapy in primary and recurrent situations as well as for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant metastatic ovarian cancer. The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib is not licensed in combination with topotecan but is an effective therapy option for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. Especially effective is the therapy with the PARP inhibitor olaparib in cases of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer in patients with BRCA mutations. Other promising PARP inhibitors (rucaparib and niraparib) as well as combinations of the angiogenesis inhibitors cediranib or bevacizumab with the PARP inhibitor olaparib are not currently licensed and are the subject of clinical studies. The angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab is also a component of the clinical routine in cases of advanced or metastatic cervical cancer and even has a significant positive influence on overall survival. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (atezolizumab, pembrolizumab and avelumab) is currently a subject of intensive clinical studies in cases of metastatic ovarian and cervical cancer, which could provide a new perspective on therapy in cases of metastatic disease in the near future.
Literatur
Du Bois A, Lück H‑J, Meier W et al (2003) A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1320–1330
Fachinformation Avastin 2016
http://www.ago-online.de/fileadmin/downloads/leitlinien/ovar/S3-Ovarialkarzinom-OL-Langversion.pdf. Zugegriffen: 24.03.2017
Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA et al (2011) Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365:2473–2483
Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J et al (2011) A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365:2484–2496
Pujade-Lauraine E, Oza AM, Perren TJ et al (2013) ICON 7: Final overall survival results in the GCIG phase III randomised trial of bevacizumab in newly diagnose ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23(8 Suppl 1): (Abstract at the 18th Meeting of the European Society of Gynecologic Cancer)
Aghajanjan C, Blank SV, Goff BA et al (2012) OCEANS: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(17):2039–2045
Ledermann JA, Embleton AC, Raja F et al (2016) Cediranib in patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (ICON6): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 387:1066–1074
Pujade-Lauraine E, Hilpert F, Weber B et al (2014) Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: the AURELIA open-label randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 32(13):1302–1308
Sehouli J, Hilpert F, Mahner S et al (2016) Topotecan (T) ± sorafenib (S) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC): a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized NOGGO–AGO intergroup Trial–TRIAS. J Clin Oncol 34(Suppl):Abstr 5522 (http://meetinglibrary.asco.org/content/169468–176)
Fachinformation Olaparib 2016
Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C et al (2012) Olaprib maintenance therapy in platinum sensitive relapsed ovarian cacner. N Eng J Med 366:1382–1392
Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C et al (2014) Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(8):852–861
Ledermann JA, Harter P, Gourley C et al (2016) Overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer (PSR SOC) receiving olaparib maintenance monotherapy: an interim analysis. J Clin Oncol 34(Suppl):Abstr 5501
Kristeleit RS (2016) Clinical activity of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib in patients (pts) with high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC) and a BRCA mutation (BRCAmut): analysis of pooled data from study 10 (parts 1, 2a, and 3) and ARIEL2 (parts 1 and 2) ESMO. Proffered Paper Session 8560.
Mirza MR, Monk BJ, Oza A et al (2016) A randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial of maintenance therapy with niraparib vs placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial). ESMO Congress, LBA3_PR.
Mirza MR, Monk BJ, Herrstedt J et al (2016) Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 375(22):2154–2164
Liu J, Barry WT, Birrer MJ et al (2014) A randomized phase 2 trial comparing efficacy of the combination of the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the antiangiogenic cediranib against olaparib alone in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:Abstr LBA5500. doi:10.1200/jco.2014.32.18_suppl.lba5500
https://gciggroup.com/system/files/OV_GINECO_PAOLA_1_V3.pdf. Zugegriffen: 24.03.2017
Altmeyer P (2017) Die Online-Enzyklopädie der Dermatologie, Venerologie, Allergologie und Umweltmedizin – PD1-Antikörper. http://www.enzyklopaedie-dermatologie.de/artikel?id=16517. Zugegriffen: 05.03.2017
Hamanishi J, Mandai M, Konishi I (2016) Immune checkpoint inhibition in ovarian cancer. Int Immunol 28(7):339–348
Mabuchi et al (2016) Ovarian Cancer - Basic Science Perspective. InTech, Rijeka. ISBN 978-9533078120
Hamanishi J, mandai M, Iwasaki M et al (2007) Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 and tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes are prognostic factors of human ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(9):3360–3365
Varga A, Piha-Paul SA, Ott PA et al (2015) Antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with PD-L1 positive advanced ovarian cancer: Interim results from a phase Ib study. J Clin Oncol 33(Suppl):Abstr 5510
Gershenson DM, Bodurka DC et al (2016) Hormonal maintenance therapy for women with low grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum. J Clin Oncol 34(Suppl):Abstr 5502
Williams CJ (2001) Tamoxifen for relapse of ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001034
Smyth JF, Gourley C, Walker G et al (2007) Antiestrogen therapy is active in selected ovarian cancer cases: the use of letrozole in estrogen receptor-positive patients. Clin Cancer Res 13:3617
Argenta PA, Thomas SG, Judson PL et al (2009) A phase II study of fulvestrant in the treatment of multiply-recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 113:205
Tewari KS, Sill MW, Long HJ 3rd et al (2014) Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 370:734–743
Frenel J‑S, Le Tourneau C, O’Neil BH et al (2016) Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced cervical squamous cell cancer: preliminary results from the phase Ib KEYNOTE-028 study. J Clin Oncol 34(Suppl):Abstr 5515
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
V. Aivazova-Fuchs und K. Friese geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Additional information
Redaktion
K. Friese, Oberaudorf
M. Kiechle, München
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aivazova-Fuchs, V., Friese, K. Erhaltungstherapie bei metastasierten gynäkologischen Malignomen. Gynäkologe 50, 320–326 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-017-4071-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-017-4071-x