Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Komplikationsmanagement in der Brustchirurgie

Managing breast surgery complications

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Operationen verursachen Komplikationen. Das Auftreten von Komplikationen lässt sich reduzieren, aber niemals ganz vermeiden. Vor diesem Hintergrund ist es notwendig, die pathophysiologischen Zusammenhänge von Komplikationen zu kennen und Vermeidungsstrategien zu erlernen.

Ziel der Arbeit

Der Beitrag zeigt eine Übersicht über die Risikofaktoren für Komplikationen. Diese Übersicht hat das Ziel, dass Operateure Hochrisikosituationen zu umgehen lernen. Des Weiteren wird auf spezielle Komplikationen bei Brustoperationen eingegangen und Fehlerquellen werden aufgezeigt. Dabei soll der Leser ein Bewusstsein für diese Fehlerquellen entwickeln, um selbst solche Situationen vermeiden zu können.

Abstract

Background

Complications arise during surgical procedures. The total number of complications can be reduced but never completely eliminated. Considering this background, it is necessary to understand the pathophysiological reasons for complications and to understand how to prevent them.

Objective

In this article, specific risk factors associated with breast surgery complications are described. The aim is for the operating surgeon to understand how to handle high-risk procedures. Furthermore, specific complications during breast surgery and sources of error are discussed. Hereby, the reader is made conscious of the possible mistakes in order to avoid and prevent as well as to manage them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Gillis CR, Hole DJ (1996) Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland. BMJ 312(7024):145–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Grilli R, Minozzi S, Tinazzi A, Labianca R, Sheldon TA, Liberati A (1998) Do specialists do it better? The impact of specialization on the processes and outcomes of care for cancer patients. Ann Oncol 9(4):365–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roohan PJ, Bickell NA, Baptiste MS, Therriault GD, Ferrara EP, Siu AL (1998) Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. Am J Public Health 88(3):454–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Clare SE (2015) The effect of dedicated breast surgeons on outcomes in breast cancer: do numbers matter. Senologie 12:146–149

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kuehn T, Vogl FD, Helms G, Pueckler SV, Schirrmeister H, Strueber R et al (2004) Sentinel-node biopsy for axillary staging in breast cancer: results from a large prospective German multi-institutional trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 30(3):252–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Staradub VL, Rademaker AW, Morrow M (2003) Factors influencing outcomes for breast conservation therapy of mammographically detected malignancies. J Am Coll Surg 196(4):518–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang F, Peled AW, Garwood E, Fiscalini AS, Sbitany H, Foster RD et al (2014) Total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an evolution of technique and assessment of outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 21(10):3223–3230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmann J, Wallwiener D (2009) Classifying breast cancer surgery: a novel, complexity-based system for oncological, oncoplastic and reconstructive procedures, and proof of principle by analysis of 1225 operations in 1166 patients. Bmc Cancer 9(108)

  9. Wallwiener D, Hahn M, Marx M, Renner SP, Brucker SY, Hoffmann J (2015) Die Bedeutung der Onkoplastik in der modernen Senologie. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 75(10):977–990

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitäts-Frauenklinik Tübingen, Calwerstr. 7, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland

    M. Hahn, M. Marx, G. Helms, C. Roehm, C. Ott & D. Wallwiener

  2. Elblandkliniken Radebeul, Radebeul, Deutschland

    M. Marx

  3. Forschungsinstitut für Frauengesundheit, Tübingen, Deutschland

    S. Y. Brucker

Authors
  1. M. Hahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Marx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Helms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Roehm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Ott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Wallwiener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S. Y. Brucker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Hahn.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

M. Hahn, M. Marx, G. Helms, C. Roehm, C. Ott, D. Wallwiener, S.Y. Brucker geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

M. Thill, Frankfurt

K. Diedrich, Hamburg

D. Wallwiener, Tübingen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hahn, M., Marx, M., Helms, G. et al. Komplikationsmanagement in der Brustchirurgie. Gynäkologe 49, 180–184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-015-3819-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-015-3819-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation