Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Invasive Diagnostik der Endometriose und Adenomyose

Vom laparoskopischen Staging zur möglichen Behandlungsstrategie

Invasive diagnostics of endometriosis and adenomyosis

From laparoscopic staging to a possible treatment strategy

Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

Cite this article

Zusammenfassung

Endometriose ist eine komplexe systemische und chronische Erkrankung. Die Diagnostik muss diesem Charakter Rechnung tragen. Von entscheidender Bedeutung ist die diagnostische Laparoskopie. Schwere und das Ausmaß der Erkrankung werden über Klassifikationen erfasst, die dazu beitragen, Lokalisationen innerhalb und außerhalb der Peritonealhöhle sowie die Aktivität zu erfassen. Eine Sentinel-Lymphknoten-Biopsie, die Anwendung der Autofluoreszenz sowie eine präzise histopathologische Begutachtung endometriotischer Läsionen könnten zukünftig für Prognose und Therapieplanung von zusätzlicher Bedeutung sein.

Abstract

Endometriosis is a complex systemic and chronic disease. Precise diagnosis is of utmost importance. Reliable classification systems are available and useful for a comprehensive characterization of the disease. Additional informations concerning prognosis and possible therapeutic strategies may be provided in future by sentinel lymph node biopsy, histopathological grading and using the method of autofluorescence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7

Literatur

  1. (o A) (1996) ASRM classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 67:817–821

  2. Balasch J, Creus M, Fabregues et al (1996) Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women and in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study. Hum Reprod 11:387–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brosens I, Puttemans P, Campo R et al (2004) Diagnosis of endometriosis: pelvic endoscopy and imaging techniques. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:285–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchweitz O, Staebler A, Tio J et al (2006) Detection of peritoneal endometriotic lesions by autofluorescence laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:949–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brinton LA, Gridley G, Persson I et al (1997) Cancer risk after a hospital discharge diagnosis of endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:572–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Demco L (2004) Laparoscopic spectral analysis of endometriosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:219–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Hooghe TM (2003) Invisible microscopic endometriosis: how wrong is the Sampson hypothesis of retrograde menstruation to explain the pathogenesis of endometriosis? Gynecol Obstet Invest 55:61–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dinulescu DM, Ince TA, Quade BJ et al (2005) Role of K-Ras and Pten in the development of mouse models of endometriosis and endometriod ovarian cancer. Nat Med 11:63–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Evers JL, Dunselman GA, Groothuis P (2005) Now you see them, now you don’t. Fertil Steril 84:31–32; discussion 38–9. Review

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillemanns P, Weingandt H, Stepp H et al (2000) Assessment of 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced porphyrin fluorescence in patients with peritoneal endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:52–57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huffman JW (1981) Endometriosis in young teen-age girls. Pediatr Ann 10:44–49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang SB, Chung HH, Lee HP et al (2007) Impact of diagnostic laparoscopy on the management of chronic pelvic pain. Surg Endosc 21(6):916–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kyama CM, Debrock S, Mwenda JM et al (2003) Potential involvement of the immune system in the development of endometriosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kupker W, Linde H van der, Loning M et al (2004) Laparoscopic autofluorescence imaging of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 82:S72–S73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Malik E, Berg C, Meyhofer-Malik A et al (2000) Fluorescence diagnosis of endometriosis using 5-aminolevulinic acid. Surg Endosc 14:452–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Medina MG, Lebovic DI (2009) Endometriosis – associated nerve fibers and pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:968–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Melin A, Sparen P, Persson I (2006) Endometriosis and the risk of cancer with special emphasis on ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod 21:1237–1242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murphy AA, Green WR, Bobbie D et al (1986) Unsuspected endometriosis documented by scanning electronmicroscopy in visualy normal peritoneum. Fertil Steril 46:522–524

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pellicer A, Albert C, Garrido N et al (2000) The pathophysiology of endometriosis – associated infertility: follicular environment and embryo quality. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 55:109–119

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Redwine DB (1999) Ovarian endometriosis: a marker for more extensive pelvic and intestinal disease. Fertil Steril 72:310–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sampson JA (1925) Endometrial carcinoma of ovary arising in endometrial tissue in that organ. Arch Surg 10:1–72

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sinaii N, Ceary SD, Ballweg ML (2002) High rates of autoimmune and endocrine disorders, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome and atopic diseases among women with endometriosis: a survey analysis. Hum Reprod 17:2715–2724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tuttlies F, Keckstein J, Ulrich U et al (2005) ENZIAN score: a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Zentralbl Gynakol 127:275–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolfram F, Riedlinger J, Weichbrodt M et al (2010) Sentinel lymph node labeling of patients with deep infiltrating rectovaginal endometriosis – does this make sense? J Endometriosis 2:33–40

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Endometriosezentrum, Stadtklinik Baden-Baden, Klinikum Mittelbaden, Balger Str. 50, 76532, Baden-Baden, Deutschland

    W. Küpker & M. Knoll

Authors
  1. W. Küpker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Knoll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Küpker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Küpker, W., Knoll, M. Invasive Diagnostik der Endometriose und Adenomyose. Gynäkologe 43, 910–917 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-010-2588-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-010-2588-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

search

Navigation