Skip to main content
Log in

Inkontinenz und Deszensus der jungen Frau

Therapeutische Konzepte

Urinary incontinence and genital prolapse in young women

Therapeutic concepts

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Ein Deszensus/Prolaps genitalis und die Inkontinenz können bei entsprechendem Leidensdruck konservativ oder operativ behandelt werden. Der Zeitpunkt, die Indikation und die Wahl des geeigneten Verfahrens, eine detaillierte Aufklärung und ausreichende Operationserfahrung sind unabdingbare Vorraussetzungen für eine anatomisch und funktionell erfolgreiche Wiederherstellung des Beckenbodens und damit einer Verbesserung der Lebensqualität.

Grundsätzlich sollte zunächst konservativ behandelt werden. Vermutlich ist es günstiger, erst nach abgeschlossener Familienplanung zu operieren. Die klassischen Operationen mit Eigengewebe sind effektiv, komplikationsarm und lange untersucht. Mesh-gestützte Verfahren werden derzeit nur für die Rezidivsituation empfohlen, sie erhöhen die anatomischen Erfolgsraten um etwa 10–15%, was sich aber derzeit noch nicht in einer höheren Patientenzufriedenheit und einer geringeren Rate an Reoperationen ausdrückt. Ausreichende Langzeitdaten liegen nicht vor, müssen aber gefordert werden. Die Weiterentwicklung der Materialien, operationstechnische Verbesserungen und der stetige Erfahrungszuwachs lassen einen vorsichtigen Optimismus zu.

Abstract

Genital prolapse and urinary incontinence can be treated conservatively and by sugery. The point in time, indication and choice of method, providing patients with detailed information about the surgery and sufficient operative experience are indispensable conditions for an effective anatomic and functional reconstruction of the pelvic floor and improvement of quality of life.

Generally conservative treatment is worth a try. Probably family planning should be completed before surgery. Standard classic procedures with autogenetic tissue are effective, safe and have been investigated for a long time. At this time mesh procedures are recommended for recurrent prolapse only. Effectiveness seems to be enhanced by 10–15%, but does not lead to higher patient satisfaction or lower re-operation rates. Long-term data are missing and should be obtained. Advancements in materials and operative methods and more expert knowledge reduce complications and allow cautious optimism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Adams E, Thomsen A, Maher C, Hagen S (2004) Mechanical devices for pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD 004010

  2. Baessler K, Anthuber C, Frank C et al (2008) Leitlinie zur konservativen und operativen Therapie des Deszensus genitalis der Frau

  3. Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER et al (2004) Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:159–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dannecker C, Wolf V, Raab R et al (2005) EMG-biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle training is an effective therapy of stress urinary or mixed incontinence: a 7-year experience with 390 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273(2):93–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dainer M, Hall CD, Choe J, Bhatia N (1998) Pregnancy following incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 9(6):385–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dean NM, Ellis G, Wilson PD, Herbison GP (2006) Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD002239

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dumoulin C, Hay Smith J (2010) Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD005654

  8. Hagen S, Stark D, Maher C, Adams E (2006) Conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD003882

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harvey MA (2003) Pelvic floor exercises during and after pregnancy: a systematic review of their role in preventing pelvic floor dysfunction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 25(6):451

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lose G, Mouritsen L, Nielsen JB (2006) A new bulking agent (polyacrylamide hydrogel)) for treating stress urinary incontinence in women. BJU Int 98:100–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hay-Smith J, Morkved S, Fairbrother KA, Herbison GP (2008) Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(4):CD007471

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K et al (2010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morkved S, Bo K, Fjortoft T (2002) Effect of adding biofeedback to pelvic floor muscle training to treat urodynamic stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 100(4):730–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C (2008) Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 19:1043–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel M, Mellen C, O’Sullivan DM, Lasala CA (2010) Impact of pessary use on prolapse symptoms, quality of life and body image. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(5):499.e1–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Petri E (2000) Neue Techniken in der Inkontinenzchirurgie. Gynakologe 33:269–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Petri E (2007) Prolapschirurgie. Gynakologe 40:702–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO et al (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reisenauer C, Lobodasch K, Goepel C et al (n d) Transvaginal mesh repair using a light-weight, partially resorbable synthetic mesh kit: interim 3 month results. (Ethicon)

  20. Richter HE et al (2010) Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 362:2066–2076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Richter HE, Goode PS, Brubaker L et al (2008) Obstet Gynecol 112(3):621–629

  22. Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ, Shull BL (1993) Vaginal pessaries and their use in pelvic relaxation. J Reprod Med 38:919–923

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sung VW, Glasgow MA, Wohlrab KJ, Myers DL (2007) Impact on age on preoperative and postoperative urinary incontinence quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(6):680.e1–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Up to date 2010, Medline abstracts midurethral slings for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women

  25. Wu V, Farrell SA, Baskett TF, Flowerdew G (1997) A simplified protocol for pessary management. Obstet Gynecol 90:990–994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/102008-surgicalmesh.html, http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm079028.htm

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Keine Angaben

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Keim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keim, S., Anthuber, C. Inkontinenz und Deszensus der jungen Frau. Gynäkologe 43, 643–652 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-010-2550-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-010-2550-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation