Skip to main content
Log in

Molekulare Medizin in der Geburtshilfe

Fluch oder Verheißung?

Molecular medicine in obstetrics

Plague or promise?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Der Geburtshilfe steht durch die molekulare Medizin eine enorme Entwicklung bevor. In der pränatalen Diagnostik und der Grundlagenforschung zur Frühgeburtlichkeit sowie Präeklampsie haben sich bereits bedeutende Neuerungen in Diagnostik und bei den Therapieansätzen ergeben. Neue Richtungen in der Medizin müssen aber Grenzen erkennen, die wissenschaftlich, ärztlich und gesellschaftlich zu definieren sein werden.

Abstract

Molecular medicine has made substantial contributions to the development of obstetrics over the past 30 years. A number of new diagnostic possibilities and therapeutic approches are being introduced in the fields of prenatal diagnosis and early research in preterm labor and preeclampsia. Looking ahead, molecular medicine in obstetrics requires public, scientific, and medical debate leading to clinical guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aidoo M, McElroy PD, Kolcyak MS, Terlouw DJ (2001) Tumor necrosis factor-alpha promoter variant 2 (TNF2) is associated with pre-term delivery, infant mortality and malaria morbidity in western Kenya: Asembo Bay Cohort Project IX. Genet Epidemiol 21: 2002–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beckmann MW (2002) Molekulare Frauenheilkunde. Gynäkologe 35: 872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carr-Hill RA, Hall MH (1985) The repetition of spontaneous preterm labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92: 921–928

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cincotta RB, Brennecke SP (1998) Family history of pre-eclampsia as a predictor for pre-eclampsia in primigravidas. Int J Gynecol Obstet 60: 23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Crider KS, Whitehead N, Buus RM (2005) Genetic variation associated with preterm birth: A HuGE review. Genet Med 7: 593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Esplin M, Fausett M, Frase A et al. (2001) Paternal and maternal components of the predisposition to preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 344: 867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffmann HJ, Bakketeig LS (1984) Risk factors associated with the occurrence of preterm birth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27: 539–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnstone F, Inglis L (1974) Familial trends in low birth weight. BMJ 3: 659–661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lachmaijer AMA, Arngrimsson R, Bastiaans EJ et al. (2001) A genome-wide scan for preeclampsia in the Netherlands. Eur J Hum Genet 9: 758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lachmaijer AMA, Dekker GA, Pals G et al. (2002) Searching for preeclampsia genes: the current position. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 105: 94

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lamont RF (2003) Recent evidence associated with the condition of preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15: 91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lie RT, Rasmussen S, Brunborg H et al. (1998) Fetal and maternal contributions to risk of pre-eclampsia: population based study 316: 1343

  13. Moses EK, Johnson MP, Tommerdal L, Forsmo S et al. (2008) Genetic association of preeclampsia to the inflammatory response gene SEPS1. Amer J Obstet Gynecol 198: 336

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romero R, Avila C, Brekus CA, Marotti R (1991) The role of systemic and intrauterine infection in preterm parturition. Ann NY Acad Sci 622: 355–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schümer D (2000) Die lukrativen Gene der Wikinger. Island wird zum Labor der Biotechnologie. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung vom 16.09.2000

  16. Unschuld PU (2008) Wunschmedizin. 37. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychosomatische Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe. Berlin

  17. Xu H, Gonzalez JM, Ofori E, Elovitz MA (2008) Preventing cervical ripening: the primary mechanism by which progestational agents prevent preterm birth? Amer J Obstet Gynecol 198: 314

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.W. Dudenhausen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dudenhausen, J. Molekulare Medizin in der Geburtshilfe. Gynäkologe 41, 667–671 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-008-2188-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-008-2188-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation