Skip to main content
Log in

Endometriumkarzinom

Endometrial cancer

  • Zum Thema
  • Published:
Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 March 2005

Zusammenfassung

Das operative Staging einschließlich der pelvinen und paraaortalen Lymphonodektomie (Ausnahme FIGO-Stadium Ia, G1, G2) stellt die wichtigste Komponente der Primärtherapie des Endometriumkarzinoms dar. Bei pN0 ist bei zusätzlichen Risikofaktoren (G2, G3, pT1b,c) eine vaginale Brachytherapie indiziert. Eine perkutane Teletherapie sollte gezielt bei nachgewiesenem Lymphknotenbefall (FIGO IIIc) durchgeführt werden. Bei Befall der Zervix (FIGO II) scheint die Durchführung einer erweiterten radikalen Hysterektomie von Vorteil zu sein. In fortgeschritteneren Stadien wird nach möglichst kompletter operativer Entfernung der Tumormanifestationen die adjuvante Strahlentherapie durch eine zusätzliche Chemotherapie ergänzt. Hier liegt aber noch Forschungsbedarf vor. Der Nutzen einer adjuvanten endokrinen Therapie konnte bisher nicht belegt werden. In der palliativen Situation sollten bei gut differenzierten und rezeptorpositiven Tumoren zunächst endokrine Therapien eingesetzt werden, sofern keine hohe Eilbedürftigkeit vorliegt. In allen anderen Fällen oder bei primärem Progress unter endokriner Therapie ist eine palliative Chemotherapie indiziert. Angesichts der unzureichenden Datenlage sollten auch Patientinnen mit Endometriumkarzinom möglichst in qualifizierten klinischen Studien behandelt werden.

Abstract

Surgical staging including pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection (except for FIGO stage IA, G1, G2) is the most important component of primary therapy of endometrial cancer. When retroperitoneal disease is excluded (pN0), a vaginal brachytherapy is indicated in G2 or G3 tumors or in stages pT1b,c. Percutaneous radiotherapy should be performed in pN+ cases (FIGO IIIc). A radical hysterectomy is probably of benefit in cases with cervical involvement (FIGO II). In more advanced stages, tumor lesions should be surgically removed. Adjuvant radiotherapy in advanced stages has been successfully supplemented with additional chemotherapy. A benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapies could not be demonstrated. In the palliative setting, endocrine therapies are the method of first choice when the tumor is well differentiated, expresses hormone receptors, and the lesions are not acutely life-threatening. In all other cases or primary progression under endocrine therapy, palliative chemotherapy is indicated. In view of the very limited data, patients with endometrial cancer should be treated in the context of qualified clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Robert-Koch-Institut (2004) Krebs in Deutschland—Häufigkeiten und Trends, 4. Aufl. Saarbrücken

  2. Emons G, Günthert A, Viereck V, Hanf V (2003) Endocrine therapy of endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia. Gynäkologe 36: 86–96

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emons G, Fleckenstein G, Hinney B, Huschmand A, Heyl W (2000) Hormonal interactions in endometrial cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 7: 227–242

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sehouli J, Camara O, Stengel D, Kohler G, Lichtenegger W (2003) Multi-institutional survey on the value of lymphadenectomy in endometrial carcinoma in Germany. Gynakol Geburtsh Rundsch 43: 104–110

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aalders J, Abeler V, Kolstad P, Onsrud M (1980) Postoperative external irradiation and prognostic parameters in stage I endometrial carcinoma: clinical and histopathologic study of 540 patients. Obstet Gynecol 56: 419–427

    Google Scholar 

  6. Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Koper PC et al. (2000) Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma. Lancet 355: 1404–1411

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL et al. (2004) A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate-risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Obstet Gynecol Surv 59: 516–518

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL et al. (2004) A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 92: 744–751

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berman ML (2004) Adjuvant radiotherapy following properly staged endometrial cancer: what role? Gynecol Oncol 92: 737–739

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kilgore LC, Partridge EE, Alvarez RD, Austin JM, Shingleton HM, Noojin F, Conner W (1995) Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling. Gynecol Oncol 56: 29–33

    Google Scholar 

  11. COSA-NZ-UK-Endometrial Cancer Study Groups (1996) Pelvic lymphadenectomy in high risk endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 6: 102–107

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fanning J (2001) Long-term survival of intermediate risk endometrial cancer (stage IG3, IC, II) treated with full lymphadenectomy and brachytherapy without teletherapy. Gynecol Oncol 82: 371–374

    Google Scholar 

  13. Orr JW, Roland PY, Leichter D, Orr PF (2001) Endometrial cancer: is surgical staging necessary? Curr Opin Oncol 13: 408–412

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larson DM, Broste SK, Krawisz BR (1998) Surgery without radiotherapy for primary treatment of endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 91: 355–359

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lo KW, Cheung TH, Yu MY, Yim SF, Chung TK (2003) The value of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer to avoid unnecessary radiotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 13: 863–869

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mariani A, Webb MJ, Galli L, Podratz KC (2000) Potential therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in node-positive endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 76: 348–356

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seago DP, Raman A, Lele S (2001) Potential benefit of lymphadenectomy for the treatment of node-negative locally advanced uterine cancers. Gynecol Oncol 83: 282–285

    Google Scholar 

  18. Irvin WP, Rice LW, Berkowitz RS (2002) Advances in the management of endometrial adenocarcinoma. A review. J Reprod Med 47: 173–189

    Google Scholar 

  19. McMeekin DS, Lashbrook D, Gold M, Scribner DR, Kamelle S, Tillmanns TD, Mannel R (2001) Nodal distribution and its significance in FIGO stage IIIc endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 82: 375–379

    Google Scholar 

  20. McMeekin DS, Tillmanns T (2003) Endometrial cancer: treatment of nodal metastases. Curr Treat Options Oncol 4: 121–130

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bristow RE, Zahurak ML, Alexander CJ, Zellars RC, Montz FJ (2003) FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma: resection of macroscopic nodal disease and other determinants of survival. Int J Gynecol Cancer 13: 664–672

    Google Scholar 

  22. Watanabe M, Aoki Y, Kase H, Fujita K, Tanaka K (2003) Low risk endometrial cancer: a study of pelvic lymph node metastasis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 13: 38–41

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barakat RR (2002) Contemporary management of endometrial cancer. American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, FL

  24. NCCN (2004) The complete Library of NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.http://www.nccn.org

  25. Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (2002) Kurzgefasste interdisziplinäre Leitlinien. AWMF-Leitlinien-Register Nr.032/034 Entwicklungsstufe 1, 3. Auflage.http://www.uni-duesseldorf.de/AWMF/II/index.html

  26. Sartori E, Gadducci A, Landoni F, Lissoni A, Maggino T, Zola P, Zanagnolo V (2001) Clinical behavior of 203 stage II endometrial cancer cases: the impact of primary surgical approach and of adjuvant radiation therapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 11: 430–437

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ayhan A, Taskiran C, Celik C, Yuce K, Kucukali T (2002) The influence of cytoreductive surgery on survival and morbidity in stage IVB endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 12: 448–453

    Google Scholar 

  28. Axelrod JBB (1995) Advanced endometrial carcinoma treated with whole abdominal irradiation: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Proc Soc Gynecol Oncol 135–136

    Google Scholar 

  29. Randall ME, Brunetto G, Muss H et al. (2004) Whole abdominal radiotherapy versus combination doxorubicin-cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: A randomized phase III trial of the Gynaecologic Oncology Group. ASCO 2003: 22

    Google Scholar 

  30. Martin-Hirsch PL, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R (2002) Progestagens for endometrial cancer. Cochrane Library, Oxford

  31. von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Brunnert K et al. (2002) Adjuvant endocrine treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate or tamoxifen in stage I and II endometrial cancer—a multicentre, open, controlled, prospectively randomised trial. Eur J Cancer 38: 2265–2271

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thigpen JT, Blessing JA, DiSaia PJ, Yordan E, Carson LF, Evers C (1994) A randomized comparison of doxorubicin alone versus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in the management of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 12: 1408–1414

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hoskins PJ, Swenerton KD, Pike JA, Wong F, Lim P, Acquino-Parsons C, Lee N (2001) Paclitaxel and carboplatin, alone or with irradiation, in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 19: 4048–4053

    Google Scholar 

  34. Flemig GF (2004) Systemic management of endometrial cancer with unusual histology. In: 40th Annual Meeting American Society of Clinical Oncology. Educational Book, pp 293–297

  35. Wang CB, Wang CJ, Huang HJ, Hsueh S, Chou HH, Soong YK, Lai CH (2002) Fertility-preserving treatment in young patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma. Cancer 94: 2192–2198

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thigpen JT, Brady MF, Alvarez RD et al. (1999) Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a dose-response study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 17: 1736–1744

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fleming GF, Brunetto VL, Mundt AJ, Burks RT, Look KY, Reid G (2002) Randomized trial of doxorubicin (DOX) plus cisplatin (CIS) versus DOX plus CIS plus paclitaxel (TAX) in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21: 202a

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fleming GF, Fowler JM, Waggoner SE et al. (2001) Phase I trial of escalating doses of paclitaxel combined with fixed doses of cisplatin and doxorubicin in advanced endometrial cancer and other gynecologic malignancies: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 19: 1021–1029

    Google Scholar 

  39. Günthert AR, Pilz S K, Kuhn W, Emons G, Meden H (1999) Docetaxel is effective in the treatment of metastatic endometrial cancer. Anticancer Res 19: 3459–3462

    Google Scholar 

  40. Creasman WT, Odicino F et al. (2001) Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. J Epidemiol Biostat 6: 47–86

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Emons.

Additional information

Ein Erratum zu diesem Beitrag können Sie unter http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00129-005-1664-6 finden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanf, V., Günthert, A.R., Hawighorst, T. et al. Endometriumkarzinom. Gynäkologe 37, 907–915 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-004-1593-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-004-1593-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation