Surface water sources are greatly impacted in areas with major agricultural land use. The atrazine quantification in surface waters as well as the spatial-temporal patterns of this herbicide was studied to detect pollution hotspots and to understand the putative factors responsible of its occurrence at the Ctalamochita river basin. The samples were collected on the aeolian fluvial plain of the river basin during five consecutive years. The results showed the high ubiquity of this compound and several sites with hazardous concentration (exceeding 0.1 µg/L international guidelines). The frequencies of quantification range from 67 to 100% in spring and 33%–67% in autumn. The atrazine content in surface water increased during the warm-rainy season, as consequence of atrazine application events (coinciding to the prevalent crop type). Overall, the study highlights the factors that could have favored atrazine pollution in the river basin such as land use, transport by runoff processes and atmospheric deposition.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alonso LL, Demetrio PM, Etchegoyen MA, Marino DJ (2018) Glyphosate and atrazine in rainfall and soils in agroproductive areas of the pampas region in Argentina. Sci Total Environ 645:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.134
Baez ME, Espinoza J, Silva R, Fuentes E (2015) Sorption-desorption behavior of pesticides and their degradation products in volcanic and nonvolcanic soils: interpretation of interactions through two-way principal component analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:8576–8585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-4036-8
Becerra MA, Hang S, Díaz-Zorita M, Mercuri PA (2013) Geographic information systems applied to delimit areas with different atrazine sorption capacity. Cienc Suelo 31:223–233. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/3118
Bonansea RI, Amé MV, Wunderlin DA (2013) Determination of priority pesticides in water samples combining SPE and SPME coupled to GC-MS. A case study: Suquía River basin (Argentina). Chemosphere 90:1860–1869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.007
Brewer R (1979) Principles of Ecology. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, pp 249–258
Byer JD, Struger J, Sverko E, Klawunn P, Todd A (2011) Spatial and seasonal variations in atrazine and metolachlor surface water concentrations in Ontario (Canada) using ELISA. Chemosphere 82:1155–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.054
CASAFE, Chamber of Agricultural Health and Fertilizers (2013) Agrochemicals Market Report, Argentina. http://www.casafe.org/publicaciones/estadisticas/. Accessed April 2021
CCME, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (1999) Canadian environmental quality guidelines: water quality guidelines for protection of aquatic life. https://ccme.ca/en/current-activities/canadian-environmental-quality-guidelines. Accessed April 2021
Corcoran S, Metcalfe CD, Sultana T, Amé MV, Menone ML (2020) Pesticides in surface waters in argentina monitored using polar organic chemical integrative samplers. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 104:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-019-02758-z
De Gerónimo E, Aparicio VC, Bárbaro S, Portocarrero R, Jaime S, Costa JL (2014) Presence of pesticides in surface water from four sub-basins in Argentina. Chemosphere 107:423–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.01.039
DeLorenzo ME, Scott GI, Ross PE (2001) Toxicity of pesticides to aquatic microorganisms: A review. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:84–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620200108
EC, European Commission (1998) Council Directive 98/83/EC. Off J Eur Comm 330:32–54
FAO (2020) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Accessed April 2021
Flores C, Morgante V, González M, Navia R, Seeger M (2009) Adsorption studies of the herbicide simazine in agricultural soils of the Aconcagua valley. Chile Chemosphere 74:1544–1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.10.060
Hang S, Barriuso E, Houot S (2003) Behavior of 14 C-atrazine in Argentinean topsoils under different cropping managements. J Environ Qual 32(6):2216–2222. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2003.2216
Hansen AM, Quintanilla LGT, Pacheco HM, Canela MV, Márquez LCG, Garcés RAG, Antonio AH (2013) Atrazina: un herbicida polémico. Rev Int Contam Ambiental 29:65–84
Leu C, Singer H, Stamm C, Müller SR, Schwarzenbach RP (2004) Simultaneous assessment of sources, processes, and factors influencing herbicide losses to surface waters in a small agricultural catchment. Environ Sci Technol 38:3827–3834. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0499602
Mahler BJ, Van Metre PC, Burley TE, Loftin KA, Meyer MT, Nowell LH (2017) Similarities and differences in occurrence and temporal fluctuations in glyphosate and atrazine in small Midwestern streams (USA) during the 2013 growing season. Sci Total Environ 579:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.236
NRA, National Registration Authority for Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (2002) Final report review of atrazine. NRA Chemical Review Program Canberra Australia, 1–57. https://apvma.gov.au/node/12371. Accessed April 2021
NSRH (2003) National Subsecretary of Water Resources, Argentine. Development of national ambient water quality guideline levels for atrazine. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/documento20.pdf. Accessed April 2021
OJEU, Official Journal of the European Union (2004) Commission decision concerning the non-inclusion of atrazine in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorizations for plant protection products containing this active substance. Brussels, Belgium
Potter TL, Bosch DD, Dieppa A, Whitall DR, Strickland TC (2013) Atrazine fate and transport within the coastal zone in southeastern Puerto Rico. Mar Pollut Bull 67:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.12.004
PPDB, Pesticide Properties DataBase (2021). https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/Reports/43.htm. Accessed April 2021
Prosser RS, Brain RA, Andrus JM, Hosmer AJ, Solomon KR, Hanson ML (2015) Assessing temporal and spatial variation in sensitivity of communities of periphyton sampled from agroecosystem to, and ability to recover from, atrazine exposure. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 118:204–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.04.047
Rodriguez MJ, Conci E, Becker A, Grumelli M, Ledesma MM, Rangone A, Forgioni F, Bouza P (2021) Environmental Risk in the Fluvio-Aeolian Plain of the Region Center of the General San Martín Department, Córdoba, Argentina. In: Rabassa J, Bilmes A, Bouza P (eds) Advances in Geomorphology and Quaternary Studies in Argentina In. Springer, Cham, pp 244–284
SAG, Secretary of Agriculture and Livestock, Government of Córdoba Province, Argentina (2004). https://manualfitosanitario.com/leyesProvinciales. Accessed April 2021
Sassine L, Le Gal La Salle C, Khaska M, Verdoux P, Meffre P, Benfodda Z, Roig B (2017) Spatial distribution of triazine residues in a shallow alluvial aquifer linked to groundwater residence time. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:6878–6888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7224-x
Stoeckel JA, Morris J, Ames E, Glover DC, Vanni MJ, Renwick W, González MJ (2012) Exposure Times to the Spring Atrazine Flush Along a Stream-Reservoir System. J Am Water Resour Assoc 48:616–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00633.x
USEPA (2003) United States Environmental Protection Agency Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Atrazine. Washington, D.C., 285 p
This work has been supported by Instituto de Investigación, Universidad Nacional de Villa María. V.M. acknowledges the support of Chilean government through Grant ANID PIA/BASAL FB0002.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Bachetti, R.A., Urseler, N., Morgante, V. et al. Monitoring of Atrazine Pollution and its Spatial-Seasonal Variation on Surface Water Sources of an Agricultural River Basin . Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 106, 929–935 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-021-03264-x
- Surface water
- Spatial-seasonal distribution
- Herbicide persistence