Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exposure to Lead (Pb2+) Eliminates Avoidance of Pb-Treated Oviposition Substrates in a Dose-Dependent Manner in Female Vinegar Flies

  • Published:
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Female vinegar flies (Drosophila melanogaster) preferentially oviposit eggs on oviposition substrates that decrease larval foraging costs. We tested whether female D. melanogaster would avoid oviposition substrates containing lead (Pb2+), which could potentially decrease offspring fitness. Wild type D. melanogaster were reared on control or Pb-treated medium from egg stage to adulthood and tested for differences in oviposition substrate preference, fecundity (number of eggs laid) and Pb accumulation. Control females laid a significantly lower proportion of eggs on Pb-treated substrates than Pb-treated females. Pb-treated females laid significantly more eggs than control females. Pb-treated adults accumulated significantly more Pb than control-treated adults. These results indicate that Pb exposure disrupts normal oviposition avoidance behaviors, which could increase larval foraging costs for larval offspring. These factors could induce population declines and have cascading implications for the ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Abolaji AO, Kamdem JP, Farombi EO, Rocha JBT (2013) Drosophila melanogaster as a promising model organism in toxicological studies. Arch Bas App Med 1:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Akins JM, Schroeder JA, Brower DL, Aposhian HV (1992) Evaluation of Drosophila melanogaster as an alternative animal for studying the neurotoxicity of heavy metals. Biometals 5:111–120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur BJ, Sunayama-Morita T, Coen P, Murthy M, Stern DL (2013) Multi-channel acoustic recording and automated analysis of Drosophila courtship songs. BMC Biol 11:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahadorani S, Hilliker AJ (2009) Biological and behavioral effects of heavy metals in Drosophila melanogaster adults and larvae. J Insect Behav 22:399–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Buekers J, Steen Redeker E, Smolders E (2009) Lead toxicity to wildlife: derivation of a critical blood concentration for wildlife monitoring based on literature data. Sci Total Environ 407:3431–3438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burke MK, Rose MR (2009) Experimental evolution with Drosophila. Am J Physiol Reg Integr Comp Physiol 296:R1847–R1854

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HH, Ma T, Paul IA, Spencer JL, Ho IK (1997) Developmental lead exposure and two-way active avoidance training alter the distribution of protein kinase C activity in the rat hippocampus. Neurochem Res 22:1119–1125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter ED, Bell AM, Levering KR (2004) The role of animal behaviour in the study of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Anim Behav 68:665–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn J, Widzowki DV, Cory-Slectha DA (1992) Lead retards development of Drosophila melanogaster. Comp Biochem Physiol 102C:45–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clutterbuck AJ, Beardmore JA (1961) Variation in the behaviour of different genotypes of Drosophila towards odoriferous vegetable oils. Nature 190:1135–1136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’ Omo G (2002) Behavioral ecotoxicology. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Solar E, Guijón AM, Walker L (1974) Choice of colored substrates for oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Boll Zool 41:253–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon ME, Wang G, Garrity PA, Huey RB (2009) Thermal preference in Drosophila. J Therm Biol 34:109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck HKM, Ebrahim SAM, Kromann S, Bown D, Hillbur Y, Sachse S, Hansson BS, Stensmyr MC (2013) Olfactory preference for egg laying on citrus substances in Drosophila. Curr Biol 23:2472–2480

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fry JD, Nuzhdin SV, Pasyukova EG, Mackay TFC (1998) QTL mapping of genotype-environment interaction for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res Camb 71:133–141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heikens A, Peijnenburg WJGM, Hendriks AJ (2001) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in terrestrial invertebrates. Environ Poll 113:385–393

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch HVB, Mercer J, Sambaziotis H, Huber M, Stark DT, Torno-Morley T et al (2003) Behavioral effects of chronic exposure to low levels of lead in Drosophila melanogaster. NeuroToxicology 24:435–442

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch HVB, Possidente D, Averill S, Palmetto Despain T, Buytkins J et al (2009) Variations at a quantitative trait locus (QTL) affect development of behavior in lead-exposed Drosophila melanogaster. NeuroToxicology 30:305–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch HVB, Lnenicka G, Possidente D, Possidente B, Garfinkel MD, Wang L, Lu X, Ruden DM (2012) Drosophila melanogaster as a model for lead neurotoxicology and toxicogenomics research. Front Gen 3:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann AA, Harshman LG (1985) Male effects on fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 39:638–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph RM, Devineni AV, King IFG, Heberlein U (2009) Oviposition preference for and positional avoidance of acetic acid provide a model for competing behavioral drives in Drosophila. PNAS 106:11352–11357

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levin ED, Aschner M, Heberlein U, Ruden D, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Bartlett S et al (2009) Genetic aspects of behavioral neurotoxicology. Neurotoxicology 20:741–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Little EE (1990) Behavioral toxicology: stimulating challenges for a growing discipline. Environ Toxicol Chem 9:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow TA, O’Grady P (2008) Reproductive ecology of Drosophila. Funct Ecol 22:747–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Massie HR, Aiello VR, Whitney SJP (1992) Lead accumulation during aging of Drosophila and effect of dietary lead on life span. Age 15:47–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mateo R, Taggart M, Meharg AA (2003) Lead and arsenic in bones of birds of prey from Spain. Environ Pollut 126:107–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie JA, Parsons PA (1972) Alcohol tolerance: An ecological parameter in the relative success of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Oecologia 10:373–388

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mogren CL, Trumble JT (2010) The impacts of metals and metalloids on insect behavior. Entomol Exp Appl 135:1–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey UB, Nichols CD (2011) Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacol Rev 63:411–436

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson EK, Yukilevich R, Kehlbeck J, LaRue KM, Ferraiolo K et al (2017a) Asymmetrical positive assortative mating induced by developmental lead (Pb2+) exposure in a model system, Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Zool 63:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson EK, Wilson DT, Possidente B, McDaniel P, Morley EJ et al (2017b) Accumulation, elimination, sequestration, and genetic variation of lead (Pb2+) loads within and between generations of Drosophila melanogaster. Chemosphere 181:368–375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson EK, Possidente B, Stark A, Hollocher KT, Carrico P (2019) Intraspecific genetic variation in reproductive strategies in susceptibility to developmental lead (Pb2+) exposure in a model system, Drosophila melanogaster. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 103:233–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rand MD (2010) Drosophotoxicology: The growing potential for Drosophila in neurotoxicology. Neurotoxicol Teratol 32:74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rand MD, Montgomery SL, Prince L, Vorojeikina D (2014) Developmental toxicity assays using the Drosophila model. Curr Protoc Toxicol 59:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan CM (1993) Neural cell adhesion molecules, neuronal development and lead toxicity. NeuroToxicology 14:69–76

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rockwell RF, Grossfield J (1978) Drosophila: Behavioral cues for oviposition. Am Midl Nat 99:361–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin GM, Yandell MD, Wortman JR, Gabor Miklos GL, Nelson CR et al (2000) Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science 287:2204–2215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz NU, Zhong L, Bellemer A, Tracey WD (2012) Egg laying decisions in Drosophila are consistent with foraging costs of larval progeny. PLoS ONE 7:e37910

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DB, Cannon WF, Woodruff LG, Solano F, Ellefsen KJ (2014) Geochemical and mineralogical maps for soils of the conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014-1082, 386

  • Uysal H, Bahceci Z (1996) Effect of lead acetate and mercury chloride on offspring production in Drosophila melanogaster. Drosoph Inf Serv 77:102–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Wogaman DJ, Seiger MB (1983) Light intensity as a factor in the choice of an oviposition site by Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Can J Genet Cytol 25:370–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C-H, Belawat P, Hafen E, Jan LY, Jan Y-N (2008) Drosophila egg-laying site selection as a system to study simple decision-making processes. Science 319:1679–1683

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Morozova TV, Hussain YN, Luoma SE, McCoy L et al (2016) The genetic basis for variation in sensitivity to lead toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Health Perspect 124:1062–1070

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a National Institute for Environmental Health Science (NIEHS) Grant (R01 ES012933), a University at Albany-State University of New York Benevolent Research Grant, and a University at Albany-State University of New York Graduate Student Association Research Grant. We would like to thank Brian Smith (College of Arts and Sciences Machine Shop, University at Albany-State University of New York) for building us our oviposition chambers. We would like to thank Thomas Graziano for his drawing of a vinegar fly in Fig. 1. We would also like to thank Drs. Gregory Lnenicka (Department of Biology, University at Albany-State University of New York), David Lawrence (Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany-State University of New York) and Roman Yukilevich (Department of Biology, Union College) for their advice and support throughout the implementation of the research and providing invaluable feedback on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York-Albany, Albany, NY, USA

    Elizabeth K. Peterson & Austin Stark

  2. Department of Biology, Colorado State University-Pueblo, 2200 Bonforte Boulevard, Pueblo, CO, 81001-4901, USA

    Claire W. Varian-Ramos

  3. Department of Geology, Union College, Schenectady, NY, USA

    Kurt T. Hollocher

  4. Department of Biology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA

    Bernard Possidente

Authors
  1. Elizabeth K. Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Austin Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claire W. Varian-Ramos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kurt T. Hollocher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bernard Possidente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth K. Peterson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peterson, E.K., Stark, A., Varian-Ramos, C.W. et al. Exposure to Lead (Pb2+) Eliminates Avoidance of Pb-Treated Oviposition Substrates in a Dose-Dependent Manner in Female Vinegar Flies. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 104, 588–594 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-020-02825-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-020-02825-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation