Abstract
Used lubricant oils and metals can be common soil pollutants in abandoned sites. When soil is contaminated with various hazardous wastes, the efficiency of biological treatments could be affected. The purpose of this work was to investigate the effect of combining phytoremediation and composting on the efficiency of hydrocarbon degradation and lead solubility in a soil contaminated with 31,823 mg/kg of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) from used motor oil and 8260 mg/kg of lead. Mexican cactus (Opuntia ficus indica) and yard trimmings were added in the composting process, and lucerne (Medicago sativa) was used in the phytoremediation process. After a 9 week composting process, only 13% of the initial TPH concentration was removed. The following 20 week phytoremediation process removed 48% of TPH. The highest TPH degradation percentage (66%), was observed in the experiment with phytoremediation only. This work demonstrates sustainable technologies, such as biological treatments, represent low-cost options for remediation; however, they are not frequently used because they require long periods of time for success.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott TS (ed) (1985) Soil testing service—methods and interpretation. NSW Department of Agriculture, Sydney
Abioye P, Agamuthu P, Abdul A (2012) Phyto treatment of soil contaminated with used lubricating oil using Hibiscus cannabinus. Biodegradation 23:277–286
Adam G, Duncan H (2002) Influence of diesel on seed germination. Environ Pollut 120(2):363–370
Adams S, Domínguez R, García H (1999) Potencial de la biorremediación de suelo y agua impactados por petróleo en el trópico mexicano. Terra Latinoamericana 17(2):159–174 (In Spanish)
Akpoveta O, Egharevba F, Medjor O, OsaroI Enyemike E. (2011) Microbial degradation and its kinetics on crude oil polluted soil. Res J Chem Sci 1(6):8–14
Basumatary B, Bordoloi S, Prasad S (2012) Crude oil-contaminated soil phytoremediation by using Cyperus brevifolius. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:3373–3383
Cairney T, Hobson D (1998) Contaminated land: problems and solutions. 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 392
Chiu S, Ting G, Cissy S, Kar-Man H (2008) Removal of spilled petroleum in industrial soils by spent compost of mushroom Pleurotus pulmonarius. Chemosphere 75:837–842
Escobar A (2014) Estudio de la biodegradación de hidrocarburos en un suelo contaminado mediante la combinación de fitoremediación y compostaje. Dissertation. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana of México. (In Spanish)
Flores L (1995) Lubricantes usados. 1st edn. INE México, México. (In Spanish)
Frick C, Germida J, Farrel R (1999) Assessment of fhytoremediation as an in-situ technique for cleaning oil contaminated sites. Proc Phyto Technol Semin 1:105–124
Hillel D (1998) Environmental soil physics. 1st edn. Book ISBN: 9780080544151 Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 771
ISO 11261:1995 Soil quality—determination of total nitrogen—modified Kjeldahl method https://www.iso.org/standard/19239.html. Accessed 3 Apr 2015
ISO 11263:1994 Soil quality—determination of phosphorus—spectrometric determination of phosphorus soluble in sodium hydrogen carbonate solution https://www.iso.org/standard/19241.html. Accessed 3 Apr 2015
Jackson M (1976). Análisis químico de suelos. Ed. Omega. Barcelona. p 662. (In Spanish)
Muratova A, Dmitrieva T, Panchenko L, Turkovskaya O (2008) Phytoremediation of oil-sludge contaminated soil. Int J Phyto 10(6):486–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510802114920
Pradhan S, Conrad J, Paterek J, Srivastava V (1998) Potential of phytoremediation for treatment of PAHs in soil at MGP sites. J Soil Contam 7:467–480
SAGARPA (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentación). 2011. Comunicado de prensa 238/11. Coordinación General de Comunicación Social. México D. F. http://sagarpa.gob.mx/saladeprensa/boletines2/2011/mayo/Documents/2011B238.pdf (Consulta: July 13, 2017). (In Spanish)
Schnoor J (1997) Technology evaluation report: phytoremediation, ground-water remediation technologies analysis center. http://clu-in.org/download/toolkit/phyto_e.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2016
Seeley HW, Vandemark PJ, Lee JL (1991) Microbes in action. A laboratory manual of microbiology. 4th edn. W.H. Freeman, New York
Singh O, Jain R (2003) Phytoremediation of toxic aromatic pollutants from soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:128–135
USEPA (1986a) Method 9080 cation-exchange capacity of soils https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/9080.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2016
USEPA (1986b) Method 7610 Potassium (atomic absorption, direct aspiration) https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/7610.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2016
USEPA (1986c) Method 7770 Sodium (atomic absorption, direct aspiration) https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/7770.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2016
USEPA (1986d) Method 7450 Magnesium (atomic absorption, direct aspiration) https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/7450.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2016
USEPA (1986e) Method 7140. Calcium (atomic absorption, direct aspiration) https://www.google.com.mx/#q=US+EPA+method+7140&spf=1500168214469. Accessed 13 July 2017
USEPA (1994) Biopiles. http://www.epa.gov/oust/pubs/tum_ch4.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2015
USEPA (1996) Method 3540C: Soxhlet extraction, part of test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods (PDF) (p 8). https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/hw-sw846/sw-846-test-method-3540c-soxhlet-extraction_.html
USEPA (1998a) An analysis of composting as an environmental remediation technology. http://www.epa.gov/compost/pubs/analpt1.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2016
USEPA (1998b) Method 7010 (SW-846): Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. https://www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research/epa-method-7010-sw-846-gr. Accessed 3 Apr 2015
USEPA (1999) Total organic carbon (TOC) in soil: SW-846 method 9060. https://www.epa.gov/quality/total-organic-carbon-toc-soil-sw-846-method. Accessed 3 Apr 2015
USEPA (2001) Use of bioremediation at superfund sites http://epa.gov/tio/download/remed/542r01019.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2016
USEPA (2004) W-846 test method 9045D: soil and waste pH. https://www.epa.gov/hw-sw846/sw-846-test-method-9045d-soil-and-waste-ph. Accessed 17 July 2017
Vázquez K (2003) Restauración de un suelo contaminado con hidrocarburos mediante la implementación de biopilas Dissertation. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México. (In Spanish)
Volke S, Velasco T (2002) Tecnologías de remediación para suelos contaminados. INE-SEMARNAT, México (In Spanish)
Volke S, Velasco T, De la Rosa P (2005) Suelos contaminados por metales y metaloides: muestreo y alternativas para su remediación. 1st edn. INE México, México. (In Spanish)
Acknowledgements
L.F. Escobar-Alvarado acknowledges the support of CONACYT (Nacional Council for Science and Technology, Mexico) for the Graduate Scholarship granted.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Escobar-Alvarado, L.F., Vaca-Mier, M., López, R. et al. Hydrocarbon Degradation and Lead Solubility in a Soil Polluted with Lead and Used Motor Oil Treated by Composting and Phytoremediation. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 100, 280–285 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-017-2211-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-017-2211-6