Effect of Soil Amendments on Microbial Resilience Capacity of Acid Soil Under Copper Stress

  • Vassanda Coumar Mounissamy
  • Samaresh Kundu
  • Rajendiran Selladurai
  • Jayanta Kumar Saha
  • Ashish Kumar Biswas
  • Tapan Adhikari
  • Ashok Kumar Patra
Article

Abstract

An incubation study was undertaken to study microbial resilience capacity of acid soil amended with farmyard manure (FYM), charcoal and lime under copper (Cu) perturbation. Copper stress significantly reduced enzymatic activities and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) in soil. Percent reduction in microbial activity of soil due to Cu stress was 74.7% in dehydrogenase activity, 59.9% in MBC, 48.2% in alkaline phosphatase activity and 15.1% in acid phosphatase activity. Soil treated with FYM + charcoal showed highest resistance index for enzymatic activities and MBC. Similarly, the highest resilience index for acid phosphatase activity was observed in soil amended with FYM (0.40), whereas FYM + charcoal-treated soil showed the highest resilience indices for alkaline, dehydrogenase activity and MBC: 0.50, 0.22 and 0.25, respectively. This investigation showed that FYM and charcoal application, either alone or in combination, proved to be better than lime with respect to microbial functional resistance and resilience of acid soil under Cu perturbation.

Keywords

Microbial resilience Soil enzymes Microbial biomass carbon Copper stress Soil amendments 

Supplementary material

128_2017_2173_MOESM1_ESM.doc (52 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 52 KB)

References

  1. Abrol IP, Sehgal JL (1994) Degraded lands and their rehabilitation in India. In: Greenland DJ, Szabolcs I (eds) Soil resilience and sustainable land use. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 129–144Google Scholar
  2. Casida LE, Klein DA, Santaro T (1964) Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci 98:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chander K, Brookes PC (1993) Residual effects of zinc, copper and nickel in sewage sludge on microbial biomass in a sandy loam. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1231–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaudhury J, Mandal UK, Sharma KL, Ghosh H, Mandal B (2005) Assessing soil quality under long-term rice-based cropping system. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36:1141–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coumar MV, Parihar RS, Dwivedi AK, Saha JK, Lakaria BL, Biswas AK, Rajendiran S, Dotaniya M, Kundu S (2015) Pigeon pea biochar as a soil amendment to repress copper mobility in soil and its uptake by spinach. Bioresources 11(1):1585–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dick RP (1997) Enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health. In: Pankhurst CE (ed) Bioindicators of soil health. CAB International, Oxon, pp 121–156Google Scholar
  7. Dick WA, Cheng L, Wang P (2000) Soil acid and alkaline phosphatase activity as pH adjustment indicators. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1915–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Enamorado-Baez SM, Abril JM. Gomez-Guzman JM (2013) Determination of 25 trace element concentrations in biological reference materials by ICP-MS following different microwave-assisted acid digestion methods based on scaling masses of digested samples. ISRN Anal Chem 2013:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. George TS, Gregory PJ, Wood M, Read D, Buresh RJ (2002) Phosphatase activity and organic acids in the rhizosphere of potential agroforestry species and maize. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1487–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giller KE (2001) Nitrogen fixation in tropical cropping systems. CAB International, WallingfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregory AS, Watts CW, Griffiths BS, Hallett PD, Kuan HL, Whitmore AP (2009) The effect of long-term soil management on the physical and biological resilience of a range of arable and grassland soils in England. Geoderma 153:172–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffiths BS, Hallett PD, Kuan HL, Pitkin Y, Aitken MN (2005) Biological and physical resilience of soil amended with heavy metal-contaminated sewage sludge. Eur J Soil Sci 56:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kizilkaya R, Askin T, Bayrakli B, Saglam M (2004) Microbiological characteristics of soils contaminated with heavy metals. Eur J Soil Biol 40:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuan L, Hallett PD, Griffiths BS, Gregory AS, Watts CW (2007) The biological and physical stability and resilience of a selection of Scottish soils to stresses. Eur J Soil Sci 58:811–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lal R (1997) Degradation and resilience of soils. Philos Trans R Soc B 352:997–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lasat MM (2002) Phytoextraction of toxic metals: a review of biological mechanisms. J Environ Qual 31:109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee JJ, Park RD, Kim YW, Shim JH, Chae DH, Rim YS, Kyoon B (2004) Effect of food waste compost on microbial population, soil enzyme activity and lettuce growth. Bioresour Technol 93:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lehmann J, Rondon M (2006) Charcoal soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics. In: Uphoff N (ed) Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 517–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Madejon E, Burgos P, Lopez R, Cabrera F (2001) Soil enzymatic response to addition of heavy metals with organic residues. Biol Fertil Soils 34:144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McGrath SP, Zhao FJ, Lombi E (2001) Plant and rhizosphere processes involved in phytoremediation of metal-contaminated soils. Plant Soil 232:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mohamad W, Chang-yong H, Zheng-miao X (2000) Comparison of the effects of copper and lead on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in red soil. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 1(2):196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Cervelli S, Conti C (1982) Hydrolases extracted from soil: kinetic parameters of several enzymes catalysing the same reaction. Soil Biol Biochem 14:429–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nannipieri P, Greco S, Ceccanti B (1990) Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. In: Bollag JM, Stotzky G (eds) Soil biochemistry. Dekker, New York, pp 293–355Google Scholar
  24. Orwin KH, Wardle DA (2004) New indices for quantifying resistance and resilience of soil biota to exogenous disturbance. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1907–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ray RC (1985) Effect of liming on dehydrogenase and rhodanese activity of flooded and non-flooded acid sulfate soils. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 6:193–197Google Scholar
  26. Ros M, Hernandez MT, Garcia C (2003) Soil microbial activity after restoration of a semiarid soil by organic amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 35:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Serra-Wittling C, Houot S, Barriuso E (1995) Soil enzymatic response to addition of municipal solid-waste compost. Biol Fertil Soils 20:226–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shoemaker HE, Mclean EO, Pratt PF (1961) Buffer methods for determining lime requirement of soils with appreciable amounts of extractable aluminum. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 25:274–277Google Scholar
  29. Smith JL, Paul EA (1990) The significance of soil microbial estimations. In: Stotzky G, Bollag JM (eds) Soil biochemistry. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 357–396Google Scholar
  30. Szabolcs I (1994) The concept of soil resilience. In: Greenland DJ, Szabolcs I (eds) Soil resilience and sustainable land use. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 33–39Google Scholar
  31. Tabatabai MA (1982) Soil enzymes. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analyses, part 2, chemical and micro-biological properties, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 903–947Google Scholar
  32. Todorova Y, Topalova Y (2013) Short-time effect of heavy metals stress on key enzyme indicators in river sediments. Bulg J Agric Sci 19(2):282–285Google Scholar
  33. Torstensson L (1997) Microbial assays in soils. In: Tarradellas J, Bitton G, Rossel D (eds) Soil ecotoxicology. CRC Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 207–233Google Scholar
  34. Uvarov AV (2000) Effects of smoke emissions from a charcoal kiln on the functioning of forest soil systems: a microcosm study. Environ Monit Assess 60:337–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vaughan D, Lumsdon DG, Linehan DJ (1993) Influence of dissolved organic matter on the bioavailability and toxicity of metals in soils and aquatic systems. J Chem Ecol 8:151–201Google Scholar
  36. Voroney RP, Winter JP, Beyaert RP (1993) Soil microbial biomass C and N. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 277–286Google Scholar
  37. Wang YP, Shi JY, Wang H, Lin Q, Chen XC, Chen YX (2007) The influence of soil heavy metals pollution on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity, and community composition near a copper smelter. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 67:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wyszkowska J, Kucharski J (2003) Effect of soil contamination with copper on its enzymatic activity and physico-chemical properties. Electron J Pol Agric Univ. http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume6/issue2/environment/art-08.html
  39. Xie W, Zhou J, Wang H, Chen X, Lu Z, Yu J, Chen X (2009) Short-term effects of copper, cadmium and cypermethrin on dehydrogenase activity and microbial functional diversity in soils after long-term mineral or organic fertilization. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:450–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zackrisson O, Nilsson MC, Wardle DA (1996) Key ecological function of charcoal from wildfire in the boreal forest. Oikos 77:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang X, Li F, Liu T, Xu C, Duan D, Peng C, Zhu S, Shi J (2013) The variations in the soil enzyme activity, protein expression, microbial biomass, and community structure of soil contaminated by heavymetals. ISRN Soil Sci. doi:10.1155/2013/803150 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vassanda Coumar Mounissamy
    • 1
  • Samaresh Kundu
    • 1
  • Rajendiran Selladurai
    • 1
  • Jayanta Kumar Saha
    • 1
  • Ashish Kumar Biswas
    • 1
  • Tapan Adhikari
    • 1
  • Ashok Kumar Patra
    • 1
  1. 1.ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil ScienceBhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations