Skip to main content

Potential Implications of Approaches to Climate Change on the Clean Water Rule Definition of “Waters of the United States”

Abstract

The 1972 Clean Water Act was passed to protect chemical, physical, and biological integrity of United States’ waters. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers codified a new “waters of the United States” rule on June 29, 2015, because several Supreme Court case decisions caused confusion with the existing rule. Climate change could affect this rule through connectivity between groundwater and surface waters; floodplain waters and the 100-year floodplain; changes in jurisdictional status; and sea level rise on coastal ecosystems. Four approaches are discussed for handling these implications: (1) “Wait and see”; (2) changes to the rule; (3) use guidance documents; (4) Congress statutorily defining “waters of the United States.” The approach chosen should be legally defensible and achieved in a timely fashion to provide protection to “waters of the United States” in proactive consideration of scientifically documented effects of climate change on aquatic ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ (2006) The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16:1311–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balbus JM, Boxall ABA, Fenske RA, McKone TE, Zeise L (2013) Implications of global climate change for the assessment and management of human health risks of chemicals in the natural environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:62–78

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brekke LD, Maurer EP, Anderson JD, Dettinger MD, Townsley ES, Harrison A, Pruitt T (2009) Assessing reservoir operations risk under climate change. Water Resour Res 45:W04411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caruso B, Haynes J (2010) Connectivity and jurisdictional issues for Rocky Mountains and Great Plains aquatic resources. Wetlands 30:865–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clean Water Act (1972) 33 USC § 1251 et seq

  6. Clean Water Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States”; Final Rule (2015) Environmental Protection Agency. Department of Defense, Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers. Federal Register 80(124), 29 June 2015

  7. Downing DM, Winer C, Wood LD (2003) Navigating through Clean Water Act jurisdiction: a legal review. Wetlands 23:475–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eaton JG, Scheller RM (1996) Effects of climate warming on fish thermal habitat in streams of the United States. Limnol Oceanogr 41:1109–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. EPA (2008) Climate change effects on stream and river biological indicators: a preliminary analysis. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. EPA/600/R 07/085

  10. EPA (2012) National Water Program 2012 strategy: response to climate change. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. EPA-850-K-12-004

  11. EPA (2014) Facts about the waters of the United States proposal. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Department of the Army, 27 May 2015

  12. EPA (2015) Connectivity of streams & wetlands to downstream waters: A review and synthesis of the scientific evidence. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. EPA/600/R-14/475F

  13. EPA and U.S. Army (2015) Technical support document for the Clean Water Rule: definition of waters of the United States. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  14. Gardner RC (2011) Lawyers, swamps, and money: U.S. wetland law, policy, and politics. Island Press, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Georgakakos AP, Yao H, Kistenmacher M, Georgakakos KP, Graham NE, Cheng FY, Spencer C, Shamir E (2012) Value of adaptive water resources management in northern California under climatic variability and change: reservoir management. J Hydrol 412–413:34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilinsky E (2014) Floodplains matter. In: Association of state floodplain managers conference, Seattle, WA, 4 June 2014

  17. Gouin T, Armitage JM, Cousins IT, Muir DC, Ng CA, Reid L, Tao S (2013) Influence of global climate change on chemical fate and bioaccumulation: the role of multimedia models. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:20–31

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haukos DA, Smith LM (1994) The importance of playa wetlands to biodiversity of the Southern High Plains. Landscape Urban Plan 28:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hooper MJ, Ankley GT, Cristol DA, Maryoung LA, Noyes PD, Pinkerton KE (2013) Interactions between chemical and climate stressors: a role for mechanistic toxicology in assessing climate change risks. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:32–48

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H.R. 1732 (2015) Regulatory Integrity Protection Act of 2015. In: 114th Congress, 1st Session, 13 May 2015

  21. IPCC (2014) IPCC fifth assessment synthesis report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1 Nov 2014

  22. Islam Z, Gan TY (2014) Effects of climate change on the surface-water management of the South Saskatchewan river basin. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 140:332–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kimberly DA, Salice CJ (2013) Interactive effects of contaminants and climate-related stressors: high temperature increases sensitivity to cadmium. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:1337–1343

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Landis WG, Durda JL, Brooks ML, Chapman PM, Menzie CA, Stahl RG, Stauber JL (2013) Ecological risk assessment in the context of global climate change. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:79–92

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leith RMM, Whitfield PH (1998) Evidence of climate change effects on the hydrology of streams in south-central BC. Can Water Resour J 23:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moe SJ, De Schamphelaere K, Clements WH, Sorensen MT, Van den Brink PJ, Liess M (2013) Combined and interactive effects of global climate change and toxicants on populations and communities. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:49–61

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mushet DM, Calhoun AJK, Alexander LC et al (2015) Geographically isolated wetlands: rethinking a misnomer. Wetlands 35:423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Natural Resources Defense Council v. Callaway (1975) 524 U.S. 79

  29. Noyes PD, Lema SC (2015) Forecasting the impacts of chemical pollution and climate change interactions on the health of wildlife. Curr Zool 61:669–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Noyes PD, McElwee MK, Miller HD, Clark BW, Van Tiem LA, Walcott KC, Erwin KN, Levin ED (2009) The toxicology of climate change: environmental contaminants in a warming world. Environ Int 35:971–986

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Proposed Rule, Definition of “Waters of the United States” (2006) Under the Clean Water Act (2014) Environmental Protection Agency. Department of Defense, Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers. Federal Register 79(76), 21 Apr 2014 Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715

  32. Rohr JR, Johnson P, Hickey CW, Helm RC, Fritz A, Brasfield S (2013) Implications of global climate change for natural resource damage assessment, restoration, and rehabilitation. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:93–101

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. SAB (2014a) Science Advisory Board (SAB) consideration of the adequacy of the scientific and technical basis of the EPA’s proposed rule titled “Definition of Waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act”. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the Administrator, Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB-14-007

  34. SAB (2014b) SAB review of the draft EPA report Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the Administrator, Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB-15-001

  35. Scavia D, Field J, Boesch D, Buddemeier R, Burkett V, Cayan D, Fogarty M, Harwell M, Howarth R, Mason C, Reed D, Royer T, Sallenger A, Titus J (2002) Climate change impacts on U.S. coastal and marine ecosystems. Estuaries 25:149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sokolova IM, Lannig G (2008) Interactive effects of metal pollution and temperature on metabolism in aquatic ectotherms: implications of global climate change. Clim Res 37:181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2001) 531 U.S. 159 (2001); 121 S.Ct. 675

  38. Stahl RG, Hooper MJ, Balbus JM, Clements W, Fritz A, Gouin T, Helm R, Hickey C, Landis W, Moe SJ (2013) The influence of global climate change on the scientific foundations and applications of environmental toxicology and chemistry: introduction to a SETAC international workshop. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:13–19

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stewart I, Cayan D, Dettinger M (2004) Changes in snowmelt runoff timing in western North America under a ‘Business as Usual’ climate change scenario. Clim Change 62:217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. U.S. Army (2015) Finding of no significant impact. Final environmental assessment. Adoption of the Clean Water Rule: definition of waters of the United States. U.S. Army, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, Washington, DC, 26 May 2015

  41. Vicuna S, Maurer EP, Joyce B, Dracup JA, Purkey D (2007) The sensitivity of California water resources to climate change scenarios. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43:482–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Zachary Loman for providing comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew T. Moore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faust, D.R., Moore, M.T., Emison, G.A. et al. Potential Implications of Approaches to Climate Change on the Clean Water Rule Definition of “Waters of the United States”. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 96, 565–572 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1773-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Clean Water Act
  • Climate change
  • Policy
  • Waters of the United States
  • Connectivity