Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Inhibition Efficiency for the Detection of Captan, 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin, Pentachlorophenol and Carbosulfan in Water: An Electrochemical Approach

  • Published:
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel bio-analytical method has been devised based on the change in catalytic activity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzyme induced by captan, carbosulfan, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD) and pentachlorophenol (PCP) for the investigation of inhibition efficiency and sensitivity using Pt/ZnO/AChE/Chitosan bioelectrode. The inhibition curves of captan, carbosulfan, TCDD and PCP were similar to Michaelis–Menten curve. TCDD held the minimum inhibitor Michaelis–Menten constant (\(K_{M}^{I}\)) value (10.2 nM) in comparison with PCP (10.9 nM), carbosulfan (14.5 nM) and captan (7.9 × 103 nM). The maximum inhibition of AChE enzyme by captan was about 100 %, which was much higher than that of TCDD (72.7 %), PCP (68.1 %) and carbosulfan (47.7 %). The calculated theoretical sensitivity was in the order of TCDD > PCP > carbosulfan > captan. Comparing with TCDD (35.3 %), PCP (47.8 %) and carbosulfan (20.9 %), only the inhibition efficiency of captan (55.0 %) was the maximum. The developed bioelectrode exhibited high recovery and low relative standard deviation in local tap water samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Scheme 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dhull V, Gahlaunt A, Dilbaghi N, Hooda V (2013) Acetylcholinesterase biosensors for electrochemical detection of organophosphorus compounds: a review. Biochem Res J 2013:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Du D, Huang X, Cai J, Zhang A (2007) Comparison of pesticide sensitivity by electrochemical test based on acetylcholinesterase biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 23:285–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du D, Chen S, Cai J, Zhang A (2008) Electrochemical pesticide sensitivity test using acetylcholinesterase biosensor based on colloidal gold nanoparticle modified sol–gel interface. Talanta 74:766–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gahlaut A, Gothwal A, Chhillar AK, Hooda V (2012) Electrochemical biosensors for determination of organophosphorus compounds: review. Open J Appl Biosens 1:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juraske R, Mutel CL, Stoessel F, Hellweg S (2009) Life cycle human toxicity assessment of pesticides: comparing fruit and vegetable diets in Switzerland and the United States. Chemosphere 77:939–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sassolas A, Simon BP, Marty JL (2012) Biosensors for pesticide detection: new trends. Am J Anal Chem 3:210–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Kim YJ, Oh BK, Choi JW (2009) Glutathione-s-transferase based electrochemical biosensor for the detection of captan. Electrochem Commun 11:181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, for their financial support [DST/TSG/PT/2008/28, SR/FST/ETI-284/2011(C) and (Nano Mission Council (No. SR/NM/PG-16/2007)]. The research was supported by Professor T. R. Rajagopalan research fund, SASTRA University. We also acknowledge SASTRA University, Thanjavur for extending infrastructural support to carry out the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Bosco Balaguru Rayappan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nesakumar, N., Ramachandra, B.L., Sethuraman, S. et al. Evaluation of Inhibition Efficiency for the Detection of Captan, 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin, Pentachlorophenol and Carbosulfan in Water: An Electrochemical Approach. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 96, 217–223 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1705-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1705-3

Keywords

Navigation