Skip to main content
Log in

Exceedance Frequency Analysis of Contaminants in Streams Under Dry-Weather Conditions in Denton, Texas

  • Published:
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Percentages of dry-weather stream samples exceeding water quality criteria for ten parameters were compiled for mixed land use watersheds in north-central Texas. Most problematic were total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS), ammonia, nitrate, phosphorus and copper. Nutrients had much higher exceedance frequency at a sampling station impacted by wastewater discharge. Whereas, TSS and TDS exceedance frequency was highest in predominantly agricultural and rangeland watersheds, and urbanized watersheds respectively. Total dissolved solids was most often exceeded in urbanized watersheds. For several parameters, especially TDS, TSS, ammonia and copper, median concentrations were below water quality thresholds in most watersheds, but exceedance frequency was high. For example, median TSS was less than its threshold in every watershed, but exceedance frequency was higher than 10 % in four of five watersheds – and nearly 43 % in one watershed. This pattern reflects the skewed nature of water quality data; often times, many observations cluster around the lowest values, causing the median to be relatively low, but several (high) outliers form the right-hand tail of the distribution. Results of this study indicate a need to examine exceedance frequency in addition to traditional descriptive measures to better understand dry-weather stream quality in watersheds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Appel PL, Hudak PF (2001) Automated sampling of stormwater runoff in an urban watershed, north-central Texas. J Environ Sci Health 36(6):897–907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brezonik PL, Stadelman TH (2002) Analysis and predictive models of stormwater runoff volumes, loads, and pollutant concentrations from watersheds in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, Minnesota, USA. Water Res 36:1743–1757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP, Sholkouhian M, Ni S (2000) Loading estimates of lead, copper, cadmium, and zinc in urban runoff from specific sources. Chemosphere 44:997–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2000) National water quality inventory, 1998 report to congress. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 841-R-00-001

  • EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2005) National management measures guidance to control nonpoint source pollution from urban areas. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA-841-B-05-004

  • EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2015) Construction site stormwater runoff control. http://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps/construction. Accessed 27 Oct 2015

  • Forbes MG, Dickson KL, Saleh F, Waller WT, Hudak PF (2005) Recovery and fractionation of phosphorus retained by lightweight expanded shale and masonry sand used as media in subsurface flow treatment wetlands. Environ Sci Technol 39(12):4621–4627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JH, Bang KW (2000) Characterization of urban stormwater runoff. Water Res 34(6):1773–1780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V, Olem H (1994) Water quality: prevention, identification, and management of diffuse pollution. Van Nostrum Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • TCEQ (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality) (2003) Guidance for assessing Texas surface and finished drinking water quality data, 2004. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • TCEQ (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality) (2010) Chapter 307—Texas surface water quality standards. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, Rule Number 2007-002-307-PR

  • TCEQ (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality) (2012) Surface water quality monitoring procedures manual. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsihrintzis VA, Hamid R (1997) Modeling and management of urban stormwater runoff quality: a review. Water Resour Manag 11:137–164

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) (2014a) National elevation dataset. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) (2014b) National land cover database (NLCD). Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC), U.S. Geological Survey, Reston

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. David Hunter and the City of Denton Watershed Protection Department for providing data and resources for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul F. Hudak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shrestha, M., Hudak, P.F. Exceedance Frequency Analysis of Contaminants in Streams Under Dry-Weather Conditions in Denton, Texas. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 96, 254–258 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1691-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1691-5

Keywords