Spatial Distribution of Mercury and Arsenic Levels in Water, Soil and Cassava Plants in a Community with Long History of Gold Mining in Tanzania

  • Elias C. Nyanza
  • Deborah Dewey
  • Deborah S. K. Thomas
  • Mark Davey
  • Sospatro E. Ngallaba
Article

Abstract

This study examined the spatial distribution of total mercury (THg) and total arsenic (TAs) in water, soil and cassava (Manihot esculenta) (leaves and roots) samples taken from areas in Rwamagasa village in northwestern Tanzania where daily living activities occur in close proximity to extensive artisanal and small scale gold mining. Results indicated that 33.3 % of the water sources had THg levels above the WHO guideline of 1.0 µg/L for safe drinking water, and 12.5 % had TAs levels above 10 µg/L. Cassava leaves were found to have higher THg (ranging from 8.3 to 167 µg/kg) and TAs (ranging from 60 to 1,120 µg/kg) levels than cassava roots, which ranged between 1.2–8.3 µg/kg for THg and 25–310 µg/kg for TAs. Concentrations of THg and TAs in soil samples ranged between 5.8–1,759 and 183–20,298 µg/kg, respectively. Both THg and TAs were found to be distributed throughout Rwamagasa village.

Keywords

Mercury Arsenic Artisanal gold mining Contamination Spatial distribution 

References

  1. Adjorlolo-Gasokpoh A, Golow AA, Kambo-Dorsa J (2012) Mercury in the surface soil and cassava, Manihot esculenta (flesh, leaves and peel) near goldmines at Bogoso and Prestea, Ghana. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89:1106–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alloway BJ, Ayres DC (1994) Chemical principles of environmental pollution. London: Blackie Academic and ProfessionalGoogle Scholar
  3. British Columbia (2010) Recommended guidance and checklist for ecological risk assessment of contaminated sites in British Columbia—Chapter 6.Urban Park. http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/epd/remediation/policy_procedure_protocol/protocols/tier1/chapter6.htm. Accessed 20 June 2013
  4. Campbell LM, Hecky RE, Muggide R, Dixon DG, Ramlal PS (2003) Variation and distribution of total mercury in water, sediment and soil from northern Lake Victoria, East Africa. Biogeochemistry 65:195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, Greenberg AE (Eds) (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edition. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association: Method 3111B, D, 3112B & 3114B.3:19–34. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environmental Federation (WEF)Google Scholar
  6. Environmental Agency (2009a) Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans. Mercury. Science Report SC 050021/SR TOX 7. Environmental Agency, BristolGoogle Scholar
  7. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (2010) ArcGIS 9.2. ESRI, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  8. Essumang DK, Dodoo DK, Obiri S, Yaney JY (2007) Arsenic, cadmium and mercury in cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) and wateryam (Colocasia esculenta) in Tarkwa a mining community. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 79(4):377–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland—GEUS (2000) Small scale mining. http://www.geus.dk/program-areas/common/int_tz01-uk.html. Accessed 20 June 2012
  10. Golden Software Inc (2010) Surfer 9. Golden Software Inc, GoldenGoogle Scholar
  11. Ikingura JR, Akagi H, Mujumba J, Messo C (2006) Environmental assessment of mercury dispersion, transformation and bioavailability in the Lake Victoria Goldfields, Tanzania. J Environ Manage 81:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ILO (1999) Social and labour issues in small-scale mines. Report for discussion at the tripartite meeting on social and labour issues in small-scale mining (TMSSM). International Labour Office, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  13. Jønsson JB, Bryceson DF (2009) Rushing for gold: mobility and small scale mining in East Africa. Dev Change 40(2):249–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keshavarzi B, Moore F, Rastmanesh F, Kermani M (2012) Arsenic in the Muteh gold mining district, Isfahan, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 67:959–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leonard TL, Taylor GE, Gustin MS, Fernandez GCJ (1998) Mercury and plants in contaminated soils: uptake, partitioning, and emission to the atmosphere. Environ Toxicol Chem 17(10):2063–2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smedley PL, Edmunds WM, Pelig-Ba KB (1996) Mobility of arsenic in groundwater in the Obuasi gold-mining area Ghana: some implications for human health. In: Appleton JD, Fuge R, McCall GJH (eds) Environmental geochemistry and health, geological society special publication, vol 113. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 163–181Google Scholar
  17. Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) (2003) National Environmental Standards: TZS789:2003—Drinking (Portable) water—specification. Tanzania Dar es Salaam: Bureau of StandardsGoogle Scholar
  18. Tanzanian Land and Survey Dept (1994) Quarter Degree Sheet (QDS) 46/1 1:50, 0000. Government of Japan (JICA), For the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania. Dar es SalaamGoogle Scholar
  19. Taylor H, Appleton JD, Lister R, Smith B, Chitamweba D, Mkumbo O (2005) Environmental assessment of mercury contamination from the Rwamagasa artisanal gold mining centre, Geita District Tanzania. Sci Total Environ 343(1–3):111–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1994) Standard operating procedure (SOP) for sampling in hazardous waste sites. Terrestrial plant sampling guidance. SOP#: 2037 Rev. 0.0. 19/10/1994. http://clu-in.org/download/ert/2037-R00.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2012
  21. Van Straaten P (2000) Human exposure to mercury due to small scale gold mining in northern Tanzania. Sci Total Environ 259(1–3):45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wagner S (2003) Socio-economic survey of Rwamagasa mining site in Geita district. Removal of Barriers to Introduction of Cleaner Artisanal Gold Mining and Extraction Technologies UNIDO—Socio-Economic Survey of Rwamagasa Mining Site in Geita District, Tanzania. Vienna, Austria: Global Mercury Project. GEF/UNDP/UNIDO, pp 3–5. http://www.unites.uqam.ca/gmf/intranet/gmp/countries/tanzania/sociological_report/Tanzania_Sociological_Report.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2012
  23. WHO (2004) Guideline for drinking water quality, vol 1. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/fulltext.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2011

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elias C. Nyanza
    • 1
  • Deborah Dewey
    • 2
  • Deborah S. K. Thomas
    • 3
  • Mark Davey
    • 4
  • Sospatro E. Ngallaba
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public HealthCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, BugandoMwanzaTanzania
  2. 2.Departments of Pediatrics and Community Health SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Department of Geography and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverUSA
  4. 4.Exploration UnitTwigg Gold LimitedMwanzaTanzania

Personalised recommendations