Abstract
The PM10 concentration (μg/m3) in Lucknow city at 4 locations in three different seasons ranged between 148.6–210.8 (avg. 187.2 ± 17.1) during summer, 111.8–187.6 (avg. 155.7 ± 22.7) during monsoon and 199.3–308.8 (avg. 269.3 ± 42.9) during winter while PM2.5 ranged between 32.4–67.2 (avg. 45.6 ± 10.9), 25.6–68.9 (avg. 39.8 ± 4.6) and 99.3–299.3 (avg. 212.4 ± 55.0) during respective seasons. The mass fraction ratio of PM2.5 ranged between 0.22–0.92 (avg. 0.42 ± 0.26) and was significantly high during winter season indicating their composition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barman SC, Singh R, Negi MPS, Bhargava SK (2008) Fine particles (PM2.5) in residential areas of Lucknow city and factors influencing the concentration. Clean Soil, Air, Water 36:111–117
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Annual Report, 2006–2007
Das M, Maiti SK, Mukhopadhyay U (2006) Distribution of PM2.5 and PM10–2.5 in PM10 fraction in ambient air due to vehicular pollution in Kolkata megacity. Environ Monit Assess 122:111–123
Dockery DW, Pope CA III (1994) Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution. Annu Rev Publ Health 15:107–132
Dockery DW, Pope CA III, Xu X (1993) An association between air pollution and mortality in six cities. N Engl J Med 329:1753–1759
Eldering A, Cass GR (1996) Source-oriented model for air pollutant effects on visibility. J Geophys Res 101:19342–19369
Guttikunda S (2009) Photochemistry of air pollution in Delhi, India. Sim air working paper series: 25
Harrison RM, Deacon AR, Jones MR, Appleby RS (1997) Sources and process affecting concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 particulate matter in Birmingham, UK. Atmos Environ 31:4103–4117
Hauck H, Berner A, Frischer T, Gomiseck B, Kundi M, Neuberger M, Puxbaum H, Preining O (2004) AUPHEP—Austrian project on health effects of particulates—general overview. Atmos Environ 38:3905–3915
Kulshreshtha A, Satsangi GP, Masih J, Taneja A (2009) Metal concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 particles and seasonal variations in urban and rural environment of Agra, India. Sci Total Environ 407:6196–6204
Kumar R, Joseph AE (2006) Air pollution concentrations of PM2.5, PM10 and NO2 at ambient and kerbsite and their correlation in metro city—Mumbai. Environ Monit Assess 119:191–199
Pope CA III (2000) Review: epidemiological basis for particulate air pollution health standards. Aerosol Sci Tech 32:4–14
Pope CA III, Dockery DW, Schwardz J (1995) Review of epidemological evidence of health effects of particulate air pollution. Inhalat Toxicol 7:1–18
Reddy MS, Venkataraman C (2000) Atmospheric optical and radiative effects of anthropogenic aerosol constituents from India. Atmos Environ 34:4511–4523
Sharma M, Maloo S (2005) Assessment of ambient air PM10 and PM2.5 and characterization of PM10 in the city of Kanpur, India. Atmos Environ 39:6015–6026
Sharma K, Singh R, Barman SC, Mishra D, Kumar R, Negi MPS, Mandal SK, Kisku GC, Khan AH, Kidwai MM, Bhargava SK (2006) Comparison of trace metals concentration in PM10 of different locations of Lucknow City, India. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 77:419–426
Spindler G, Muller E, Bruggemann E, Gnauk T, Herrmann H (2004) Long term size segregated characterization of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 at the IfT research station Melpitz downwind of Leipzig (Germany) using high and low volume filter samplers. Atmos Environ 38:5333–5347
USEPA (1995) Air quality criteria for particulate matter, vol. II. External review draft EPA/600/AP-95/001b, US
WHO (2006) Use of air quality guidelines in protecting public health: global update. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs313/enS
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge all Technical staff of the Environmental Monitoring Sections for their support during different phases of work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pandey, P., Khan, A.H., Verma, A.K. et al. Seasonal Trends of PM2.5 and PM10 in Ambient Air and Their Correlation in Ambient Air of Lucknow City, India. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 88, 265–270 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0466-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0466-x