Skip to main content

Trends in Mercury Concentrations in New York State Fish

Abstract

Atmospheric emissions of mercury in the US are being reduced, but worldwide mercury emissions remain high. Mercury is also being removed from many consumer items. Changes over time in mercury concentrations in fish remain important to resource managers and the general public. There is hope that mercury concentrations in fish will decline, and the number of fish consumption advisories due to mercury will decrease. We compared mercury concentrations in yellow perch (Perca flavescens) from a group of Adirondack lakes with data collected 12–17 years earlier and found variable responses among lakes. We observed an average decline of 14% in yellow perch mercury concentrations over the past 15 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Analytical Software (2003) Statistix 8. Tallahassee, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong RW, Sloan RJ (1980) Trends in levels of several known chemical contaminants in fish from New York State waters. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Technical Report 80-2, Albany, NY

  3. Blette VL, Munson RK, Gherini SA, Driscoll CT, Schofield CL (1995) Mercury in Adirondack fish and surface waters. Research Report prepared for Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation, NY

  4. Driscoll CT, Yan C, Schofield CL, Munson R, Holsapple J (1994) The mercury cycle and fish in the Adirondack lakes. Environ Sci Technol 28:136A–143A. doi:10.1021/es00052a003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Driscoll CT, Driscoll KM, Roy KM, Dukett J (2007) Changes in the chemistry of lakes in the Adirondack region of New York following declines in acidic deposition. Appl Geochem 22:1181–1188. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.03.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Engstrom DR, Swain EB (1997) Recent declines in atmospheric mercury deposition in the Upper Midwest. Environ Sci Technol 31:960–967. doi:10.1021/es9600892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammerschmidt CR, Fitzgerald WF (2006) Methylmercury in freshwater fish linked to atmospheric mercury deposition. Environ Sci Technol 40:7764–7770. doi:10.1021/es061480i

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hrabik TR, Watras CJ (2002) Recent declines in mercury concentration in a freshwater fishery: isolating the effects of de-acidification and decreased atmospheric mercury deposition in Little Rock Lake. Sci Total Environ 297:229–237. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00138-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutcheson MS, Rose J, Smith CM, West CR, Pancorbo O, Sullivan J, Eddy B (2006) Massachusetts Fish Tissue Mercury Studies: Long-term Monitoring Results, 1999–2004. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Report, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jeremiason JD, Engstrom DR, Swain EB, Nater EA, Johnson BM, Almendinger JE, Monson BA, Kolka RK (2006) Sulfate addition increases methylmercury production in an experimental wetland. Environ Sci Technol 40:3800–3806. doi:10.1021/es0524144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lynch JA, Bowersox VC, Grimm JW (2000) Changes in sulfate deposition in eastern USA following implementation of Phase I of Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Atmos Environ 34:1665–1680. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00426-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Raynal DJ, Mitchell MJ, Driscoll CT, Roy KM (2004) Effects of atmospheric deposition of sulfur, nitrogen, and mercury on Adirondack ecosystems. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY. Report 04-03

  13. Simonin HA, Gloss SP, Driscoll CT, Schofield CL, Kretser WA, Karcher RW, Symula J (1994) Mercury in yellow perch from Adirondack drainage lakes (New York, U.S.). In: Watras CJ, Huckabee JW (eds) Mercury pollution, integration and synthesis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, p 457

    Google Scholar 

  14. Simonin HA, Loukmas JJ, Skinner LC, Roy KM (2008a) Strategic monitoring of mercury in New York State fish. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY. Report 08-11

  15. Simonin HA, Loukmas JJ, Skinner LC, Roy KM (2008b) Lake variability: key factors controlling mercury concentrations in New York State fish. Environ Pollut 154:107–115. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. USEPA (2001) Method 1631, Appendix A, Total mercury in tissue, sludge, sediment, and soil by acid digestion and bromine chloride oxidation. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA-821-R-01-013)

  17. VanArsdale A, Weiss J, Keeler G, Miller E, Boulet G, Brulotte R, Poissant L (2005) Patterns of mercury deposition and concentration in Northeastern North America (1996–2002). Ecotoxicology 14:37–52. doi:10.1007/s10646-004-6258-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority provided substantial funding for this project. We thank E. Latremore, D. Edwards, C. Swamp, N. Liddle and T. Pope for technical and field assistance and the Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation fisheries personnel for assistance with fish collections.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard A. Simonin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simonin, H.A., Loukmas, J.J., Skinner, L.C. et al. Trends in Mercury Concentrations in New York State Fish. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 83, 214–218 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-009-9717-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mercury
  • Fish
  • Trends
  • Adirondacks