Evaluation of a Methodology for Toxicity Testing of Volatile Chlorinated Hydrocarbons on Marine Organisms

  • James Hunt
  • Gavin Birch
  • Michael St. J. Warne
  • Rick Krassoi
Article

Abstract

This study evaluated the suitability of sealed containers for toxicity testing to prevent loss of volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons (VCHs) with a range of Australian marine organisms including: micro-algae; sea urchin and oyster larvae in 44 mL sealed vials and fish larvae; amphipods; and juvenile polychaetes in 1 L sealed jars. Vials prevented volatilisation of VCHs during testing. Jars were less effective, with average losses of 46%. Growth and development of algae, sea urchins and oysters in vials was acceptable, indicating suitability of the methodology. Jars were suitable for amphipods and polychaetes; however, further evaluation of the fish test is required.

Keywords

Volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons Toxicity testing Sealed containers 

References

  1. ANZECC and ARMCANZ (2000) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and the Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, National Water Quality Management Strategy, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  2. Brack W, Rottler H, Frank H (1998) Volatile fractions of landfill leachates and their effect on Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: In vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence. Environ Toxicol Chem 17(10):1982–1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen A, Nugegoda D (2000) Toxicity of three oil spill remediation techniques to the Australian Bass Macquaria novemaculeata. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 47:178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Galassi S, Vighi M (1981) Testing toxicity of volatile substances with algae. Chemosphere 10:1123–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Herman DC, Inniss WE, Mayfield CI (1990) Impact of volatile aromatic hydrocarbons, alone and in combination, on growth of freshwater algae Selenastrum capricornutum. Aquat Toxicol 18:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hogan AC, Stauber JL, Pablo F, Adams MS, Lim RP (2005) The development of marine toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) procedures using the unicellular alga Nitzschia closterium. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48:433–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hunt JE, Birch G, Warne MSJ (2007) Deriving trigger values for, and assessing hazard posed by, volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons in a Sydney estuary. Aust J Ecotoxicol 13:33–42Google Scholar
  8. Lin J-H, Kao W-C, Tsai K-P, Chen C-Y (2005) A novel algal toxicity testing technique for assessing the toxicity of both metallic and organic toxicants. Water Res 39:1869–1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mayer P, Nyholm N, Verbruggen EMJ, Hermens JLM, Tolls J (2000) Algal growth inhibition test in filled, closed bottles for volatile and sorptive materials. Environ Toxicol Chem 19(10):2551–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rose RM, Warne MSJ, Lim RP (1997) Inter-species conversion equations for predicting toxicity of non-polar narcotic chemicals to Ceriodaphnia dubia. Aust J Ecotoxicol 3:75–83Google Scholar
  11. Tsai K-P, Chen C-Y (2007) An algal toxicity database of organic toxicants derived by a closed system technique. Environ Toxicol Chem 26(9):1931–1939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. USEPA (1996) Test methods for evaluating solid waste; Revision 2 Vol B. US Environmental Protection Agency, National Technical Information Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. USEPA (2002) Short term methods for estimating the chronic Toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to marine and estuarine organisms. US Environmental Protection Agency. Report nr EPA-821-R-02-014Google Scholar
  14. Widdows J (1993) Marine and estuarine invertebrate toxicity tests. In: Calow P (ed) Handbook of Ecotoxicology, vol 1. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 145–166, chapter 9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Hunt
    • 1
  • Gavin Birch
    • 1
  • Michael St. J. Warne
    • 2
  • Rick Krassoi
    • 3
  1. 1.Environmental Geology Group, School of GeosciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Environmental Contaminants ResearchCSIROAdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.Ecotox Services Australasia Pty LtdLane CoveAustralia

Personalised recommendations