Advertisement

Evaluation of a Polyacrylamide Soil Additive to Reduce Agricultural-Associated Contamination

  • D. M. Krauth
  • J. L. BouldinEmail author
  • V. S. Green
  • P. S. Wren
  • W. H. Baker
Article

Abstract

Polyacrylamide is an effective water treatment product used to reduce suspended sediment and associated contaminants. An anionic polyacrylamide-containing product was tested for sediment and associated contaminant reduction and potential toxicity in agricultural irrigation and rainfall runoff. The product effectively reduced turbidity, total suspended solids, and phosphate concentrations in the field when compared to the untreated runoff waters. Acute survival of Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas was not decreased compared to laboratory controls. No significant increases in toxicity were measured in 10-d sediment toxicity tests with Chironomus dilutus. Product applications were effective in controlling sediment and nutrient contamination without increasing measured toxicity.

Keywords

Agricultural runoff Polyacrylamide Acute toxicity Water quality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Science Foundation (NSF) RISE Program, Dr. Robyn Hannigan, Dr. Carolyn Dowling, Naresh Kanderi of Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation, and Judd Hill Foundation. The authors also acknowledge J. Adair, E. Ashcraft, N. Enger-Luster, J. Farris, M. Gopalan, S. Greenway, T. Hudson, T. Masingale, I. Mundali, and J. Stegall for their assistance.

References

  1. Agassi M, Letey J, Farmer WJ, Clark P (1995) Soil erosion contribution to pesticide transport by furrow irrigation. J Environ Qual 24:892–895Google Scholar
  2. American Public Health Administration (APHA), American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous (1995) Natural Resources Conservation Service West National Technical Center Interim Conservation Practice Standard – Irrigation Erosion Control (Polyacrylamide)-WNTC 201, 1.5 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahr GL, Steiber TD (1996) Reduction of nutrient and pesticide losses through the application of polyacrylamide in surface irrigated crops. In: Sojka RE, Lentz RD (eds) Proceedings: managing irrigation-induced erosion and infiltration with polyacrylamide, 6–8 May 1996, College of Southern Idaho, Twin Falls, ID. University of Idaho Misc. Pub. 101–96, pp 41–48Google Scholar
  5. Barvenik FW (1994) Polyacrylamide characteristics related to soil applications. Soil Sci 158:235–243. doi: 10.1097/00010694-199410000-00002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchholz FL (1992) Polyacrylamides and polyacrylic acids. In: Elvers B, Hawkins S, Schulz G (eds) Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry, vol A21. VCH Weinheim, Germany, pp 143–146Google Scholar
  7. Entry JA, Sojka RE (1999) Influence of polyacrylamide application to soil on movement of microorganisms in irrigation water. pp 93–99. Proceedings: Irrigation Association International Irrigation Show & Technical Conference. Orlando, FL, 7–9 Nov 1999Google Scholar
  8. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-Size Analysis. In: Black WC (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodrich MS, Dulak LH, Freidman MA, Lech JJ (1991) Acute and longterm toxicity of water-soluble cationic polymers to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykus) and the modification of toxicity by humic acid. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:509–551. doi: 10.1897/1552-8618(1991)10[509:AALTOW]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Green VS, Stott DE, Norton LD, Graveel JG (2000) Polyacrylamide molecular weight and charge effects on infiltration under simulated rainfall. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1786–1791Google Scholar
  11. Green VS, Stott DE, Graveel JG, Norton LD (2004) Stability analysis of soil aggregates treated with anionic polyacrylamides of different molecular formulations. Soil Sci 169:573–581. doi: 10.1097/01.ss.0000138416.30169.3f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laird DA (1997) Bonding between polyacrylamide and clay mineral surfaces. Soil Sci 162:826–832. doi: 10.1097/00010694-199711000-00006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lentz RD, Sojka RE (1994) Field results using polyacrylamide to manage furrow erosion and infiltration. Soil Sci 158: 274–282. doi: 10.1097/00010694-199410000-00007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lentz RD, Sojka RE (1999) Applying polymers to irrigation water: evaluating strategies for furrow erosion control. ASAE Paper No. 99014. Handout; ASAE Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada, 18–21 July 1999Google Scholar
  15. Lentz RD, Shainberg I, Sojka RE, Carter DL (1992) Preventing irrigation furrow erosion with small applications of polymers. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1926–1932Google Scholar
  16. Lentz RD, Sojka RE, Robbins CW (1998) Reducing phosphorus losses from surface-irrigated fields: emerging polyacrylamide technology. J Environ Qual 27:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lentz RD, Sojka RE, Robbins CW, Kincaid DC, Westermann DT (2001) Polyacrylamide for surface irrigation to increase nutrient-use efficiency and protect water quality. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32:1203–1220. doi: 10.1081/CSS-100104109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leonard RA (1990) Movement of pesticides into surface waters. In: Ching HH (ed) Pesticides in the soil environment: processes, impacts, and modeling. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 303–309Google Scholar
  19. Mitchell AR (1986) Polyacrylamide application in irrigation water to increase infiltration. Soil Sci 141:353–358. doi: 10.1097/00010694-198605000-00010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Orts WJ, Sojka RE, Glenn GM, Gross RA (1999) Preventing soil erosion with polymer additives. Polym News 24:406–413Google Scholar
  21. Orts WJ, Sojka RE, Glenn GM (2000) Biopolymer additives to reduce soil erosion-induced soil losses during irrigation. Ind Crops Prod 11:19–29. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00030-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Seybold CA (1994) Polyacrylamide review: soil conditioning an environmental fate. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 25:2171–2185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shainberg I, Warrington DN, Rengasamy P (1990) Water quality and PAM interactions in reducing surface sealing. Soil Sci 149:301–307. doi: 10.1097/00010694-199005000-00007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shainberg I, Gal M, Ferreira AG, Goldstein D (1991) Effect of water quality and amendments on the hydraulic properties and erosion from several mediterranean soils. Soil Technol 4:135–146. doi: 10.1016/0933-3630(91)90025-I CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sojka RE, Lentz RD (1997) Reducing furrow irrigation erosion with polyacrylamide (PAM). J Prod Agric 10:1–2, 47–52Google Scholar
  26. Trout TJ, Sojka RE, Lentz RD (1995) Polyacrylamide effect on furrow erosion and infiltration. Trans ASAE 38:761–765Google Scholar
  27. US EPA (2000a) National Water Quality Inventory: 1998 Report to Congress. United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP), Cincinnati, OH. EPA 841/R-00/001Google Scholar
  28. US EPA (2000b) Methods for measuring the toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment associated contaminants with freshwater invertebrates, 2nd edn. EPA 600-R-99-064Google Scholar
  29. US EPA (2002) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 5th edn. United States Environmental Protection Agency, National center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP), Cincinnati, OH. EPA-821/R-02/012Google Scholar
  30. Weeks LE, Colter WG (1952) Effect of synthetic soil conditioners on erosion control. Soil Sci 73:473–484. doi: 10.1097/00010694-195206000-00006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. M. Krauth
    • 1
  • J. L. Bouldin
    • 2
    Email author
  • V. S. Green
    • 3
  • P. S. Wren
    • 2
  • W. H. Baker
    • 4
  1. 1.San Jose City CollegeSan JoseUSA
  2. 2.Ecotoxicology Research Facility, Environmental Sciences ProgramArkansas State UniversityState UniversityUSA
  3. 3.College of Agriculture, Environmental Sciences ProgramArkansas State UniversityState UniversityUSA
  4. 4.United States Department of Agriculture Foreign Agriculture ServiceWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations