Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social contacts, friends and satisfaction with friendships in patients with psychotic, mood and neurotic disorders 1 year after hospitalisation: data from five European countries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

People with severe mental illness often struggle with social relationships, but differences among diagnostic groups are unclear. We assessed and compared objective and subjective social relationship indicators among patients with psychotic, mood and neurotic disorders one year after hospitalisation in five European countries (Belgium, Germany, Italy, Poland and United Kingdom).

Methods

The number of social contacts, including family members and friends during the previous week (Social Network Schedule), and satisfaction with the number and quality of friendships (Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life Quality) were assessed by face-to-face interview. Linear regression models were used to analyse associations with diagnostic groups.

Results

Participants (n = 2155) reported on average 2.79 ± 2.37 social contacts overall in the previous week, among whom, a mean of 1.65 ± 1.83 (59.2 ± 38.7%) were friends. Satisfaction with friendships was moderate (mean 4.62, SD 1.77). In the univariable model, patients with psychotic disorders reported having less social contact with friends than those with either mood (p < 0.05) or neurotic disorders (p < 0.001), but this difference disappeared when adjusting for socioeconomic and clinical variables (β = − 0.106, 95% CI − 0.273 to 0.061, p = 0.215). Satisfaction with friendships was similar across diagnostic groups in both univariable (β = − 0.066, 95% CI − 0.222 to 0.090, p = 0.408) and multivariable models (β = 0.067, 95% CI − 0.096 to 0.229, p = 0.421). The two indicators showed a weak correlation in the total sample (total social contacts, rs = 0.266; p < 0.001; friends, rs = 0.326, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

While objective and subjective social relationship indicators appear to be weakly correlated concepts, there is no variation in either indicator across diagnostic groups when confounders are taken into account among patients with severe mental illness. Interventions specifically targeting social relationships are needed, but they do not necessitate diagnosis-specific adaptations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Umberson D, Montez JK (2010) Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. J Health Soc Behav 51:S54–S66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pantell M, Rehkopf D, Jutte D, Syme SL, Balmes J, Adler N (2013) Social isolation: a predictor of mortality comparable to traditional clinical risk factors. Am J Pub Health 103:2056–2062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D (2015) Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci 10:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, Ronzi S, Hanratty B (2016) Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart 102:1009–1016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaremka LM, Andridge RR, Fagundes CP, Alfano CM, Povoski SP, Lipari AM, Kiecolt-Glaser JK (2014) Pain, depression, and fatigue: loneliness as a longitudinal risk factor. Health Psychol 33:948–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brugha T, Jenkins R, Bebbington P, Meltzer H, Lewis G, Farell M (2004) Risk factors and the prevalence of neurosis and psychosis in ethnic groups in Great Britain. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39:939–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Borge L, Martinsen EW, Ruud R, Watne Ø, Friis S (1999) Quality of life, loneliness, and social contact among long-term psychiatric patients. Psychiatr Serv 50:81–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bengtsson-Tops A, Hansson L (2001) Quantitative and qualitative aspects of the social network in schizophrenic patients living in the community. Relationship to sociodemographic characteristics and clinical factors and subjective quality of life. Int J Soc Psychiatry 47:67–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiovitz-Ezra S, Ayalon L (2010) Situational versus chronic loneliness as risk factors for all-cause mortality. Int Psychogeriatr 22:455–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rico-Uribe LA, Caballero FF, Martín-María N, Cabello M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Miret M (2018) Association of loneliness with all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 13(1):e0190033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meltzer H, Bebbington P, Dennis MS, Jenkins R, McManus S, Brugha TS (2013) Feelings of loneliness among adults with mental disorder. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 48:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Palumbo C, Volpe U, Matanov A, Priebe S, Giacco D (2015) Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review. BMC Res Notes 8:560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holwerda T, Beekman A, Deeg D, Stek M, Van Tilburg T, Visser P, Schoevers R (2012) Increased risk of mortality associated with social isolation in older men: only when feeling lonely? Results from the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL). Psychol Med 42:843–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang J, Lloyd-Evans B, Giacco D, Forsyth R, Nebo C, Mann F, Johnson S (2017) Social isolation in mental health: a conceptual and methodological review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 52:1451–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson-Gayer XC, Morgan C (2013) Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 22:131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cannon M, Jones P, Gilvarry C, Rifkin L, McKenzie K, Foerster A, Murray R (1997) Premorbid social functioning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: similarities and differences. Am J Psychiatry 154:1544–1550

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Visentini C, Cassidy M, Bird VJ, Priebe S (2018) Social networks of patients with chronic depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 241:571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giacco D, Palumbo C, Strappelli N, Catapano F, Priebe S (2016) Social contacts and loneliness in people with psychotic and mood disorders. Compr Psychiatry 66:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Terzian E, Tognoni G, Bracco R, De Ruggieri E, Ficociello RA, Mezzina R, Pillo G (2013) Social network intervention in patients with schizophrenia and marked social withdrawal: a randomized controlled study. Can J Psychiatry 58:622–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson K, Laxhman N, Priebe S (2015) Can mental health interventions change social networks? A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 15:297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giacco D, Bird VJ, Ahmad T, Bauer M, Lasalvia A, Lorant V, Miglietta E, Moskalewicz J, Nicaise P, Pfenning A, Welbel M, Priebe S (2018) The same or different psychiatrists for in- and out-patient treatment? A multi-country natural experiment. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 18:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organization (1992) The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dunn M, O'Driscoll C, Dayson D, Wills W, Leff J (1990) The TAPS Project. 4: an observational study of the social life of long-stay patients. Br J Psychiatry 157:842–848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S (1999) Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatry 45:7–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guy W (2000) Clinical global impressions (CGI) scale. Psychiatric measures. APA, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ormel J, Jeronimus BF, Kotov R, Riese H, Bos EH, Hankin B, Rosmalen JGM, Oldehinkel AJ (2013) Neuroticism and common mental disorders: meaning and utility of a complex relationship. Clin Psychol Rev 33:686–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li X, Wong W, Lamoureux EL, Wong TY (2012) Are linear regression techniques appropriate for analysis when the dependent (outcome) variable is not normally distributed? Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:3082–3083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gariepy G, Honkaniemi H, Quesnel-Vallee A (2016) Social support and protection from depression: systematic review of current findings in Western countries. Br J Psychiatry 209:284–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wyngaerden F, Nicaise P, Dubois V, Lorant V (2019) Social support network and continuity of care: an ego-network study of psychiatric services. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 54:725–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dozier M, Harris M, Bergman H (1987) Social network density and rehospitalization among young adult patients. Hosp Community Psychiatry 38:61–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sörgaard K, Hansson L, Heikkilä J, Vinding HR, Bjarnason O, Bengtsson-Tops A, Merinder L, Nilsson LL, Sandlund M, Middlenoe T (2001) Predictors of social relations in persons with schizophrenia living in the community: a Nordic multicentre study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 36:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Putnam R (1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J Democr 6:64–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ehsan AM, de Silva MJ (2015) Social capital and common mental disorder: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Comm Health 69:1021–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rüesch P, Graf J, Meyer PC, Rössler W, Hell D (2004) Occupation, social support and quality of life in persons with schizophrenic or affective disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39:686–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nagy E, Moore S (2017) Social interventions: an effective approach to reduce adult depression? J Aff Dis 218:131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Giacco D, McCabe R, Kallert T, Hansson L, Fiorillo A, Priebe S (2012) Friends and symptom dimensions in patients with psychosis: a pooled analysis. PLoS ONE 7(11):e50119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nasser EH, Overholser JV (2005) Recovery from major depression: the role of support from family, friends, and spiritual beliefs. Acta Psychiatr Scand 111:125–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the wider COFI study group, the support of the funders, the supporting services and the participants who took part in the study.

Funding

This study was funded by the European Commission 7th Framework Programme. Grant agreement number is 602645.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt Buhagiar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval was obtained in all participating countries: Belgium: Comité d’Ethique hospitalo-facultaire des Cliniques St-Luc Brussels; Germany: Ethical Board, Technische Universität Dresden; Italy: Comitati Etici per la sperimentazione clinica (CESC) delle provincie di Verona, Rovigo, Vicenza, Treviso, Padova; Poland: Komisja Bioetyczna przy Instytucie Psychiatrii i Neurologii w Warszawie; and UK: National Research Ethics Committee North East—Newcastle & North Tyneside (ref: 14/NE/1017).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 97 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buhagiar, K., Priebe, S., Klingemann, J. et al. Social contacts, friends and satisfaction with friendships in patients with psychotic, mood and neurotic disorders 1 year after hospitalisation: data from five European countries. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 56, 363–373 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01915-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01915-8

Keywords

Navigation