Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of public versus media responsibility messages on stigmatization of people with schizophrenia in an American adult sample

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

People with mental illness suffer from the consequences of stigma. Interventions to reduce stigma should focus on alternative approaches that target false beliefs toward mental disorders. The effectiveness of two messages to reduce stigma toward schizophrenia was tested: a traditional public responsibility message that attributes stigma to public misunderstandings, and an alternative media responsibility message that attributes stigma to bias in media representations.

Methods

An experiment with Americans (N = 448) randomly assigned to a public responsibility message, a media responsibility message, or a control condition. Participants in the two message conditions completed measures of guilt and reactance toward the media. Perceptions of personal responsibility and dangerousness, and social rejection intentions were assessed for all participants.

Results

Both messages lowered perceptions of dangerousness and social rejection intentions, relative to control. The media responsibility generated more reactance toward the media than the public responsibility approach, but not more guilt. Reactance did not mediate message effects. Perceptions of personal responsibility were reduced after exposure to the public responsibility message, but only for participants with no prior contact with mental illness.

Conclusions

Both approaches reduced perceptions of dangerousness and social rejection intentions. Stigma reduction campaigns might segment the audience based on prior contact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institute of Mental Health (2019) Mental illness. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/mental-illness.shtml#part_154788. Accessed 23 Jan 2019

  2. Boysen GA, Vogel DL (2008) Education and mental health stigma: the effects of attribution, biased assimilation, and attitude polarization. J Soc Clin Psychol 27:447–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bathje G, Pryor J (2011) The relationships of public and self-stigma to seeking mental health services. J Ment Health Couns 33:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Angermeyer MC, Beck M, Dietrich S, Holzinger A (2004) The stigma of mental illness: patients’ anticipations and experiences. Int J Soc Psychiatry 50:153–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wahl OF (1999) Mental health consumers’ experience of stigma. Schizophr Bull 25:467–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson P, Turk D, Jilka S, Cella M (2018) Measuring attitudes towards mental health using social media: investigating stigma and trivialisation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 54:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Link BG, Struening EL, Neese-Todd S et al (2001) Stigma as a barrier to recovery: the consequences of stigma for the self-esteem of people with mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv 52:1621–1626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Corrigan PW, Druss BG, Perlick DA (2014) The impact of mental illness stigma on seeking and participating in mental health care. Psychol Sci Public Interest 15:37–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alisky JM, Iczkowski KA (1990) Barriers to housing for deinstitutionalized psychiatric patients. Psychiatr Serv 41:93–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Corrigan PW, Watson AC (2002) Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry 1:16

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Stangor C, Crandall CS (2003) Threat and the social construction of stigma. The social psychology of stigma. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 62–87

    Google Scholar 

  12. Link BG, Phelan JC (2001) Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol 27:363–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feldman DB, Crandall CS (2007) Dimensions of mental illness stigma: what about mental illness causes social rejection? J Soc Clin Psychol 26:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Corrigan PW, Morris SB, Michaels PJ et al (2012) Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies. Psychiatr Serv 63:963–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross AM, Morgan AJ, Jorm AF, Reavley NJ (2018) A systematic review of the impact of media reports of severe mental illness on stigma and discrimination, and interventions that aim to mitigate any adverse impact. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 54:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rüsch N, Angermeyer MC, Corrigan PW (2005) Mental illness stigma: concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. Eur Psychiatry 20:529–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Corrigan PW, Penn DL (1999) Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. Am Psychol 54:765–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown SA, Evans Y, Espenschade K, O’Connor M (2010) An examination of two brief stigma reduction strategies: filmed personal contact and hallucination simulations. Commun Ment Health J 46:494–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Couture S, Penn D (2003) Interpersonal contact and the stigma of mental illness: a review of the literature. J Ment Health 12:291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thornicroft G, Mehta N, Clement S et al (2016) Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination. The Lancet 387:1123–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Corrigan PW, Kerr A, Knudsen L (2005) The stigma of mental illness: explanatory models and methods for change. Appl Prev Psychol 11:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Penn DL, Kommana S, Mansfield M, Link BG (1999) Dispelling the stigma of schizophrenia II. The impact of information on dangerousness. Schizophr Bull 25:437–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Finkelstein J, Lapshin O, Wasserman E (2008) Randomized study of different anti-stigma media. Patient Educ Couns 71:204–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Clement S, Lassman F, Barley E et al (2013) Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma. Cochrane Libr 2013:1–121

    Google Scholar 

  25. Griffiths KM, Carron-Arthur B, Parsons A, Reid R (2014) Effectiveness of programs for reducing the stigma associated with mental disorders. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry 13:161–175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Agrawal N, Duhachek A (2010) Emotional compatibility and the effectiveness of antidrinking messages: a defensive processing perspective on shame and guilt. J Mark Res 47:263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bessarabova E, Turner MM, Fink EL, Blustein NB (2015) Extending the theory of reactance to guilt appeals. Z Für Psychol 223:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Keefe DJ (2000) Guilt and social influence. Ann Int Commun Assoc 23:67–101

    Google Scholar 

  29. O’Keefe DJ (2002) Guilt as a mechanism of persuasion. In: Dillard JP, Pfau M (eds) The persuasion handbook: developments in theory and practice, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 329–344

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Coulter RH, Pinto MB (1995) Guilt appeals in advertising: what are their effects? J Appl Psychol 80:697–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sherman DK, Cohen GL (2002) Accepting threatening information: self–Affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 11:119–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Legault L, Gutsell JN, Inzlicht M (2011) Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: how motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psychol Sci 22:1472–1477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC et al (2002) Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health 92:901–907

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Bergsma LJ (2004) Empowerment education: the link between media literacy and health promotion. Am Behav Sci 48:152–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Brehm JW (1966) A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Quick BL, Shen L, Dillard JP (2013) Reactance theory and persuasion. In: Dillard JP, Shen L (eds) The SAGE handbook of persuasion: developments in theory and practice, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 167–183

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wahl OF (1995) Media madness: public images of mental illness. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wahl OF (2003) News media portrayal of mental illness: implications for public policy. Am Behav Sci 46:1594–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rodrigues-Silva N, Falcão de Almeida T, Araújo F et al (2017) Use of the word schizophrenia in Portuguese newspapers. J Ment Health 26:426–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Klin A, Lemish D (2008) Mental disorders stigma in the media: review of studies on production, content, and influences. J Health Commun 13:434–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Parrott S, Parrott CT (2015) Law & disorder: the portrayal of mental illness in US crime dramas. J Broadcast Electron Media 59:640–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fazio RH, Zanna MP (1981) Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 14:161–202

    Google Scholar 

  43. Perloff RM (2010) The dynamics of persuasion: communication and attitudes in the 21st century. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Millar MG, Millar KU (1996) The effects of direct and indirect experience on affective and cognitive responses and the attitude–behavior relation. J Exp Soc Psychol 32:561–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Evans-Lacko S, Henderson C, Thornicroft G (2013) Public knowledge, attitudes and behaviour regarding people with mental illness in England 2009-2012. Br J Psychiatry 202:s51–s57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gerbner G, Gross L, Morgan M et al (2002) Growing up with television: cultivation processes. In: Bryant J, Zillmann D (eds) Media effects: advances in theory and research, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp 43–67

    Google Scholar 

  47. Shrum LJ (1995) Assessing the social influence of television: a social cognition perspective on cultivation effects. Commun Res 22:402–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shrum LJ (2001) Processing strategy moderates the cultivation effect. Hum Commun Res 27:94–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shrum LJ, O’Guinn TC (1993) Processes and effects in the construction of social reality: construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Commun Res 20:436–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Angermeyer MC, Dietrich S, Pott D, Matschinger H (2005) Media consumption and desire for social distance towards people with schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 20:246–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Diefenbach DL, West MD (2007) Television and attitudes toward mental health issues: cultivation analysis and the third-person effect. J Commun Psychol 35:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Granello DH, Pauley PS (2000) Television viewing habits and their relationship to tolerance toward people with mental illness. J Ment Health Couns 22:162

    Google Scholar 

  53. Peer E, Vosgerau J, Acquisti A (2014) Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behav Res Methods 46:1023–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci 6:3–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sprouse J (2011) A validation of Amazon mechanical turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behav Res Methods 43:155–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bradburn NM, Sudman S, Wansink B (2004) Asking questions: the definitive guide to questionnaire design–for market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaire. Wiley, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dillard JP, Shen L (2005) On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Commun Monogr 72:144–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Corrigan PW, Rowan D, Green A et al (2002) Challenging two mental illness stigmas: personal responsibility and dangerousness. Schizophr Bull 28:293–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Link BG, Phelan JC, Bresnahan M et al (1999) Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. Am J Public Health 89:1328–1333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Holmes EP, Corrigan PW, Williams P et al (1999) Changing attitudes about schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 25:447–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Young DG, Tisinger RM (2006) Dispelling late-night myths: news consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors of exposure to various late-night shows. Harv Int J Press 11:113–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yuan E (2011) News consumption across multiple media platforms: a repertoire approach. Inf Commun Soc 14:998–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In: Hayes AF, Slater MD, Snyder LB (eds) The SAGE sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 13–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  64. Barczyk AN (2015) Relationship between the public’s belief in recovery, level of mental illness stigma, and previous contact. Community Ment Health J 51:38–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Scharrer E, Blackburn G (2018) Is reality TV a bad girls club? Television use, docusoap reality, television viewing, and the cultivation of the approval of aggression. J Mass Commun Q 95:235–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017706482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. O’Keeffe D, Turner N, Foley S et al (2016) The relationship between mental health literacy regarding schizophrenia and psychiatric stigma in the Republic of Ireland. J Ment Health 25:100–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Sieff E (2003) Media frames of mental illnesses: the potential impact of negative frames. J Ment Health 12:259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Duguid MM, Thomas-Hunt MC (2015) Condoning stereotyping? How awareness of stereotyping prevalence impacts expression of stereotypes. J Appl Psychol 100:343–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Lindsey LLM, Yun KA, Hill JB (2007) Anticipated guilt as motivation to help unknown others: an examination of empathy as a moderator. Commun Res 34:468–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Chung AH, Slater MD (2013) Reducing stigma and out-group distinctions through perspective-taking in narratives. J Commun 63:894–911

    Google Scholar 

  72. Phelan JE, Basow S (2007) College students’ attitudes toward mental illness: an examination of the stigma process. J Appl Soc Psychol 37:2877–2902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Gronholm PC, Henderson C, Deb T, Thornicroft G (2017) Interventions to reduce discrimination and stigma: the state of the art. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 52:249–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1341-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Gottfried J, Shearer E (2017) Americans’ online news use is closing in on TV news use. In: Pew Res. Cent. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/07/americans-online-news-use-vs-tv-news-use/. Accessed 22 Aug 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    Thais M. Zimbres, Robert A. Bell & Laramie D. Taylor

  2. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    Robert A. Bell

Authors
  1. Thais M. Zimbres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert A. Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laramie D. Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thais M. Zimbres.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zimbres, T.M., Bell, R.A. & Taylor, L.D. Effects of public versus media responsibility messages on stigmatization of people with schizophrenia in an American adult sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 55, 917–927 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01788-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01788-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation