Public health and criminal justice stalking victimization data collection efforts are plagued by subjective definitions and lack of known psychosocial correlates. The present study assesses the question of stalking victimization prevalence among three groups. Psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with stalking victimization experiences were assessed.
Archival data (n = 2159) were drawn from a three-sample (i.e., U.S. nationwide sexual diversity special interest group, college student, and general population adult) cross-sectional survey of victimization, sexuality, and health.
The range of endorsement of stalking-related victimization experiences was 13.0–47.9%. Reported perpetrators were both commonly known and unknown persons to the victim. Participants disclosed the victimization primarily to nobody or a family member/friend. Bivariate correlates of stalking victimization were female gender, Associates/Bachelor-level education, bisexual or other sexual orientation minority status, hypertension, diabetes, older age, higher weekly drug use, elevated trait aggression, higher cognitive reappraisal skills, lower rape myth acceptance, and elevated psychiatric symptoms. Logistic regression results showed the strongest factors in identifying elevated stalking victimization risk were: older age, elevated aggression, higher cognitive reappraisal skills, lesser low self-control, increased symptoms of suicidality and PTSD re-experiencing, and female and other gender minority status.
Behavioral approaches to epidemiological and criminal justice stalking victimization are recommended. Victimization under reporting to healthcare and legal professionals were observed. Further research and prevention programming is needed to capitalize on data concerning personality and coping skills, sexual diversity, and trauma-related psychiatric symptoms.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Tjaden PG, Thoennes N (1998) Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control; 1998. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/169592.pdf. Accessed March 25 2018
Basile KC, Swahn MH, Chen J, Saltzman LE (2006) Stalking in the United States: recent national prevalence estimates. Am J Prev Med 31(2):172–175
Breiding MJ (2014) Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States. 2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Surv Summ 63(8):1–18
Nobles MR, Fox KA (2017) The extent, nature, and dynamic of stalking against women on college campuses. In: Kaukinen C, Hughes Miller M, Powers RA (eds) Addressing and preventing violence against women on college campuses. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
Fox KA, Nobles MR, Fisher BS (2011) Method behind the madness: an examination of stalking measurements. Aggress Violent Beh 16(1):74–84
Reyns BW, Englebrecht CM (2014) Informal and formal help-seeking decisions of stalking victims in the United States. Crim Justice Behav 41(10):1178–1194
Brady PQ, Nobles MR (2017) The dark figure of stalking examining law enforcement response. J Interpers Violence 32(20):3149–3173
Jordan CE, Wilcox P, Pritchard AJ (2007) Stalking acknowledgement and reporting among college women experiencing intrusive behaviors: implications for the emergence of a “classic stalking case. J Crim Justice 35(5):556–569
McNamara CL, Marsil DF (2012) The prevalence of stalking among college students: the disparity between researcher-and self-identified victimization. J Am Coll Health 60(2):168–174
Smith SG, Chen J, Basile KC, Gilbert LK, Merrick MT, Patel N, Walling M, Jain A (2017) The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010–2012 State Report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta
Brown GA (2004) Gender as a factor in the response of the law-enforcement system to violence against partners. Sex Cult 8(3–4):3–139
Catalano S (2012) Stalking victimization in the United States—Revisited (NCJ 224527). U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, D.C.
Brady PQ, Nobles MR, Bouffard LA (2017) Are college students really at a higher risk for stalking? Exploring the generalizability of student samples in victimization research. J Crim Justice 52:12–21
Diette TM, Goldsmith AH, Hamilton D, Darity W, McFarland K (2014) Stalking: does it leave a psychological footprint? Soc Sci Q 95(2):563–580
Davis KE, Coker AL, Sanderson M (2002) Physical and mental health effects of being stalked for men and women. Violence Vict 17(4):429
Cramer RJ, McNiel DE, Holley SR, Shumway M, Boccellari A (2012) Mental health in violence crime victims: does sexual orientation matter? Law Hum Behav 36:87–95
Rothman EF, Exner D, Baughman AL (2011) The prevalence of sexual assault against people who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual in the United States: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse 12(2):55–66
Baum K, Catalano S, Rand M, Rose K (2009) Stalking victimization in the United States (NCJ 224527). U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, D.C.
Pathé MT, Mullen PE, Purcell R (2000) Same-gender stalking. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 28(2):191–197
Purcell R, Pathé M, Mullen PE (2002) The prevalence and nature of stalking in the Australian community. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 36(1):114–120
Sheridan L, Scott AJ, North AC (2014) Stalking and age. J Threat Assess Manag 1(4):262
Strand S, McEwan TE (2011) Same-gender stalking in Sweden and Australia. Behav Sci Law 29(2):202–219
Gemberling TM, Cramer RJ, Miller RS (2015) BDSM as sexual orientation: a comparison to lesbian, gay, and bisexual sexuality. J Positi Sex 1:37–43
Pitagora D (2016) Intimate partner violence in sadomasochistic relationships. Sex Relatsh Ther 31(1):95–108
Fox KA, Gover AR, Kaukinen C (2009) The effects of low self-control and childhood maltreatment on stalking victimization among men and women. Am J Crim Justice 34(3–4):181
Ménard KS, Pincus AL (2014) Child maltreatment, personality pathology, and stalking victimization among male and female college students. Violence Vict 29(2):300–316
Terzi L, Martino F, Berardi D, Bortolotti B, Sasdelli A, Menchetti M (2017) Aggressive behavior and self-harm in borderline personality disorder: the role of impulsivity and emotion dysregulation in a sample of outpatients. Psychiatry Res 249:321–326
Meaning R, Hasking P, Reupert A (2016) Borderline personality disorder symptoms in college students: the complex interplay between alexithymia, emotional dysregulation and rumination. PLoS ONE 11(6):e0157294
Alegría-Flores K, Raker K, Pleasants RK, Weaver MA, Weinberger M (2017) Preventing interpersonal violence on college campuses: the effect of One Act training on bystander intervention. J Interpers Violence 32(7):1103–1126
Turmanis SA, Brown RI (2006) The stalking and harassment behaviour scale: measuring the incidence, nature, and severity of stalking and relational harassment and their psychological effects. Psychol Psychother 79(2):183–198
Purcell R, Pathé M, Mullen PE (2005) Association between stalking victimisation and psychiatric morbidity in a random community sample. Br J Psychiatry 187(5):416–420
Kraaij V, Arensman E, Garnefski N, Kremers I (2007) The role of cognitive coping in female victims of stalking. J Interpers Violence 22(12):1603–1612
Strauss CV, Haynes EE, Cornelius TL, Shorey RC (2016) Stalking victimization and substance use in college dating relationships: an exploratory analysis. J Interpers Violence 0886260516663899
Kuehner C, Gass P, Dressing H (2012) Mediating effects of stalking victimization on gender differences in mental health. J Interpers Violence 27(2):199–221
Gemberling TM, Cramer RJ, Wright S, Nobles MR (2015) Psychological functioning and violence victimization and perpetration in BDSM practitioners from the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom. Technical Report. pp 1–25
Cramer RJ, Desmarais SL, Johnson KL, Gemberling TM, Nobles MR, Holley SR, Wright S, Van Dorn R (2017) The intersection of interpersonal and self-directed violence among general adult, college student and sexually diverse samples. Int J Soc Psychiatry 63(1):78–85
Nobles MR, Fox KA, Piquero NL, Piquero AR (2009) Career dimensions of stalking victimization and perpetration. Justice Q 26:476–503
Buss AH, Perry M (1992) The aggression questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol 63:452–459
Gross JJ, John OP (2003) Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Pers Soc Psychol 85:348–362
Payne DL, Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF (1999) Rape myth acceptance: exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. J Res Pers 33(1):27–68
Grasmick HG, Tittle CR, Bursik RJ, Arneklev BJ (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. J Res Crime Delinq 30:5–29
Osman A, Wong JL, Bagge CL, Freedenthal S, Gutierrez PM, Lozano G (2012) The depression anxiety stress scales—21 (DASS-21): further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates. J Clin Psychol 68:1322–1338
Conybeare D, Behar E, Soloman A, Newman MG, Borkovec TD (2012) The PTSD checklist-civilian version: reliability, validity, and factor structure in a nonclinical sample. J Clin Psychol 68:699–713
Osman A, Bagge CL, Gutierrez PM, Konick LC, Kopper BA, Barrios FX (2001) The suicidal behaviors questionnaire-revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment 8:443–454
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New York
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2005) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York
Menard S (2002) Applied logistic regression analysis, vol 106. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Chen H, Cohen P, Chen S (2010) How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Commun Stat 39:860–864
Herek GM, Gillis JR, Cogan JC (2009) Internalized stigma among sexual minority adults: insights from a social psychological perspective. J Couns Psychol 56:32–43
Tillyer MS, Wright EM (2014) Intimate partner violence and the victim-offender overlap. J Res Crime Delinq 51(1):29–55
Scott-Storey K (2011) Cumulative abuse: Do things add up? An evaluation of the conceptualization, operationalization, and methodological approaches in the study of the phenomenon of cumulative abuse. Trauma Violence Abuse 12(3):135–150
Finkelhor D, Ormrod RK, Turner HA (2007) Poly-victimization: a neglected component in child victimization. Child Abuse Neglect 31(1):7–26
Boxer P, Terranova AM (2008) Effects of multiple maltreatment experiences among psychiatrically hospitalized youth. Child Abuse Neglect 32(6):637–647
Banyard VL, Williams LM, Siegel JA (2001) The long-term mental health consequences of child sexual abuse: an exploratory study of the impact of multiple traumas in a sample of women. J Trauma Stress 14(4):697–715
Campbell R, Greeson MR, Bybee D, Raja S (2008) The co-occurrence of childhood sexual abuse, adult sexual assault, intimate partner violence, and sexual harassment: a mediational model of posttraumatic stress disorder and physical health outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 76(2):194
Fox KA, Nobles MR, Fisher BS (2016) A multi-theoretical framework to assess gendered stalking victimization: the utility of self-control, social learning, and control balance theories. Justice Q 33(2):319–347
Nobles MR, Fox KA (2013) Assessing stalking behaviors in a control balance theory framework. Crim Justice Behav 40(7):737–762
The authors gratefully acknowledge the SPPE editorial staff and anonymous peer-reviewers for their valuable insights.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by two University ethics committees and has, therefore, been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All participants gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.
About this article
Cite this article
Nobles, M.R., Cramer, R.J., Zottola, S.A. et al. Prevalence rates, reporting, and psychosocial correlates of stalking victimization: results from a three-sample cross-sectional study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 53, 1253–1263 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1557-3
- Mental health