The utility of outpatient commitment: acute medical care access and protecting health

  • Steven P. Segal
  • Stephania L. Hayes
  • Lachlan Rimes
Original Paper

Abstract

Objectives

This study considers whether, in an easy access single-payer health care system, patients placed on outpatient commitment—community treatment orders (CTOs) in Victoria Australia—are more likely to access acute medical care addressing physical illness than voluntary patients with and without severe mental illness.

Method

For years 2000 to 2010, the study compared acute medical care access of 27,585  severely mentally ill psychiatrically hospitalized patients (11,424 with and 16,161 without CTO exposure) and 12,229 never psychiatrically hospitalized outpatients (individuals with less morbidity risk as they were not considered to have severe mental illness). Logistic regression was used to determine the influence of the CTO on the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of physical illness requiring acute care.

Results

Validating their shared and elevated morbidity risk, 53% of each hospitalized cohort accessed acute care compared to 32% of outpatients during the decade. While not under mental health system supervision, however, the likelihood that a CTO patient would receive a physical illness diagnosis was 31% lower than for non-CTO patients, and no different from lower morbidity-risk outpatients without severe mental illness. While, under mental health system supervision, the likelihood that CTO patients would receive a physical illness diagnosis was 40% greater than non-CTO patients and 5.02 times more likely than outpatients were. Each CTO episode was associated with a 4.6% increase in the likelihood of a member of the CTO group receiving a diagnosis.

Conclusion

Mental health system involvement and CTO supervision appeared to facilitate access to physical health care in acute care settings for patients with severe mental illness, a group that has, in the past, been subject to excess morbidity and mortality.

Keywords

Outpatient commitment Community treatment orders Medical care access for the severely mentally ill Physical illness morbidity among psychiatric patients Civil commitment law 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest related to the use or interpretation of the study results.

Supplementary material

127_2018_1510_MOESM1_ESM.docx (49 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 48 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Segal SP, Burgess PM (2006) Conditional release: a less restrictive alternative to hospitalization? Psychiatr Serv 57(11):1600–1606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Felker B, Yazel JJ, Short D (1996) Mortality and medical comorbidity among psychiatric patients: a review. Psychiatr Serv 47:1356–1363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Getty C, Perese E, Knab S (1998) Capacity for self-care of persons with mental illnesses living in community residences and the ability of their surrogate families to perform health care functions. Issues Mental Health Nurs 19(1):53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koranyi EK (1979) Morbidity and rate of undiagnosed physical illnesses in a psychiatric clinic population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 36(4):414–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morden NE, Mistler LA, Weeks WB, Bartels SJ (2009) Health care for patients with ssevere mental illness: family medicine’s role. J Am Board Fam Med 22(2):187–195CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Institute of Mental Health (1991) Caring for people with severe mental disorders: a national plan of research to improve services. Washington, DC: National Institute of Mental Health Contract No.: DDHS Pub. No. (ADM) pp 91–1762Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parks J, Svendsen D, Singer P, Foti ME (2006) Morbidity and mortality in people with severe mental illness. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Medical Directors Council, Alexandria VAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wright J, Weber E (1987) Homelessness and health. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeHert M, Correll CU, Bobes J, Cetkovich-Bakmas M, Cohen D, Asai I et al (2011) Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care. World Psychiatr Off J World Psychiatr Assoc (WPA) 10(1):52–77Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koyanagi C, Siegwarth A (2009) How will health reform help people with mental illnesses? Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Disability Rights California (2012) Assisted outpatient treatment is unnecessary and efforts should instead be used to ensure increased access to voluntary services. Disability Rights California Legislation and Public Information Unit, editor. Disability Rights California Legislation and Public Information Unit, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carra` G, Bartoli F, Carretta D, Crocamo C, Bozzetti A, Clerici M, Bebbington PE (2014) The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in people with severe mental illness: a mediation analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 49:1739–1746.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-014-0835-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hiday VA, Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Borum R, Wagner HR (2002) Impact of outpatient commitment on victimization of people with severe mental illness. Am J Psychiatry 159:1403–1411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Segal SP, Kotler PL (1993) Sheltered care residence: ten-year personal outcomes. Am J Orthopsychiatry 63:80–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Test MA (1992). Training in community living. In: Liberman RP (ed) Handbook of psychiatric rehabilitation. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    New York State Office of Mental Health (2005) Kendra’s law: final report on the status of assisted outpatient treatmentGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Segal S, Burgess P (2006) Effect of conditional release from hospitalization on mortality risk. Psychiatr Serv 57(11):1607–1613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kisely S, Preston N, Xiao J, Lawrence D, Louise S, Crowe E (2012) Reducing all-cause mortality among patients with psychiatric disorders: a population-based study. Can Med Assoc J 185(1):E50-6Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Segal SP, Hayes SL, Rimes L (2017). The utility of outpatient commitment: II. Mortality risk, protecting health, safety, and quality of life (APPI-PS-2016-00164.R5). Psychiatr Serv 68(12):1255–1261Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kisely S, Crowe E, Lawrence D (2013) Cancer-related mortality in people with mental illness. JAMA Psychiatry 70(2):209–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leucht S, Burkard T, Henderson JH, Maj M, Sartorius N (2007) Physical illness and schizophrenia: a review of the evidence. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Victoria Legal Aid (2010). Patients’ rights: a self-help guide to Victoria’s mental health act. Melbourne AU: Victoria Legal Aid and Mental Health Legal Centre Inc. p31 http://www.communitylaw.org.au/mentalhealth
  23. 23.
    Tansella M, Micciolo R, Biggeri A, Bisoffi G, Balestrieri M (1995) Episodes of care for first-ever psychiatric patients. A long-term case-register evaluation in a mainly urban area. Br J Psychiatry 167(2):220–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Consumers Health Forum of Australia (2016) Our Health Our Community. http://ourhealth.org.au/rep-support/consumer-reps-guide-australias-health-system/parts-health-system/acute-care#.WAKk_iSPa6M. Accessed 15 Oct 2016
  25. 25.
    IBM Corp (2015) IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 23.0. IBM Corp, ArmonkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Technical Paper: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Segal SP, Burgess PM (2006) The utility of extended outpatient civil commitment. Int J Law Psychiatry 29(6):525–534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lahijani SC, Harris KA (2017) Medical complications of psychiatric treatment: an update. Crit Care Clin 33(3):713–734CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Victoria Department of Health and Human ServicesMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations