What drives the relationship between combat and alcohol problems in soldiers? The roles of perception and marriage
While the relationship between combat exposure and alcohol problems is well-established, the role of perceptions of trauma is less understood. The goal of this study was to explore associations between National Guard (NG) and reserve soldiers’ perceptions of combat experiences as traumatic and alcohol problems, and to examine marital satisfaction as a possible protective factor.
The Operation: SAFETY study recruited US Army Reserve and NG soldiers and their partners to complete a questionnaire covering many physical and mental health, military service, and substance use topics. Negative binomial regression models examined the impact of perceived trauma of combat experiences on alcohol problems (N = 198). The potential role of marital satisfaction as a resiliency factor was also examined.
The perception of combat experiences as traumatic was associated with increased risk of alcohol problems (risk ratio [RR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01, 1.12; p = 0.024). Combat exposure itself showed no relationship. Marital satisfaction had a significant interaction with perceived combat trauma on alcohol problems (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.81, 0.99, p = 0.046), such that soldiers who perceived combat exposure as moderately-highly traumatic were less likely to have alcohol problems when they rated their marital satisfaction highly.
Our results demonstrate that the perception of combat experiences as traumatic may be a greater contributor to adverse outcomes, such as alcohol problems, than mere combat exposure. They also demonstrate the importance of marital satisfaction as a resiliency factor, particularly at the highest levels of trauma.
KeywordsReserve soldiers Combat exposure Alcohol problems Marital satisfaction Trauma perceptions
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01DA034072 (GGH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Portions of this work were presented at a symposium at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 2016.
Compliance with ethical standards
The State University of New York at Buffalo’s Institutional Review Board as well as the Army Human Research Protections Office, Office of the Chief, Army Reserve as well as the Adjutant General of the National Guard approved the study protocol. All participants provided informed consent.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Wright KM, Foran HM, Wood MD, Eckford RD, McGurk D (2012) Alcohol problems, aggression, and other externalizing behaviors after return from deployment: understanding the role of combat exposure, internalizing symptoms, and social environment. J Clin Psychol 68(7):782–800. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21864 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Homish GG, Homish DL, Cummings KJ, Heavey SC (2015) Military Deployments, Combat Exposure and Partner Drinking Paper presented at the Research Society on Alcoholism San Antonio, Texas, June 2015Google Scholar
- 11.Eisen SV, Schultz MR, Vogt D, Glickman ME, Elwy AR, Drainoni ML, Osei-Bonsu PE, Martin J (2012) Mental and physical health status and alcohol and drug use following return from deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. Am J Public Health 102 Suppl 1:S66–S73. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300609 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Leonard KE, Eiden RD (2007) Marital and family processes in the context of alcohol use and alcohol disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 3:285–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091424 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 24.Vest BM, Cercone Heavey S, Homish DL, Homish GG (2017) Marital satisfaction, family support, and pre-deployment resiliency factors related to mental health outcomes for reserve and national guard soldiers. Mil Behav Health 5(4): 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/21635781.2017.1343694
- 27.Castaneda LW, Harrell MC, Varda DM, Curry Hall K, Beckett MK, Stern S (2008) Deployment experiences of guard and reserve families: implications for support and retention. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Google Scholar
- 28.Devonish JA, Homish DL, Vest BM, Daws RC, Hoopsick RA, Homish GG (2017) The impact of military service and traumatic brain injury on the substance use norms of Army Reserve and National Guard Soldiers and their spouses. Addict Behav 72:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Vogt D, Smith BN, King DW, King LA (2012) Manual for the deployment risk and resilience inventory-2 (DRRI-2): a collection of measures for studying deployment-related experiences of military veterans. National Center for PTSD, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
- 35.Goldmann E, Calabrese JR, Prescott MR, Tamburrino M, Liberzon I, Slembarski R, Shirley E, Fine T, Goto T, Wilson K, Ganocy S, Chan P, Serrano MB, Sizemore J, Galea S (2012) Potentially modifiable pre-, peri-, and postdeployment characteristics associated with deployment-related posttraumatic stress disorder among ohio army national guard soldiers. Ann Epidemiol 22(2):71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.11.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Fischer EP, Sherman MD, McSweeney JC, Pyne JM, Owen RR, Dixon LB (2015) Perspectives of family and veterans on family programs to support reintegration of returning veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological services 12(3):187–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000033 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar