Abstract
Purpose
Reducing the use of coercion among patients with mental disorders has long been a political priority. However, risk factors for coercive measures have primarily been investigated in smaller studies. To reduce the use of coercion, it is crucial to identify people at risk which we aim to do in this first large-scale study.
Methods
A cohort study was conducted among all psychiatric inpatients in Denmark, following 112,233 individuals during 1999–2014. Data from Danish registers were analysed using logistic regression for repeated measures.
Results
24,594 inpatients were exposed to a coercive measure (21.9%). Clinical characteristics were the foremost predictors of coercion and patients with organic mental disorder had the highest increased risk of being subjected to a coercive measure (OR = 5.56; 95% CI = 5.04, 6.14). The risk of coercion was the highest in the first admission and decreased with the number of admissions (all p < 0.001). The following socioeconomic variables were associated with an increased risk of coercion: male sex, unemployment, lower social class and immigrants from low and middle income countries (all p < 0.001). Early retirement and social relations, such as being married and having children, reduced the risk of being subjected to coercive measure (all p < 0.05).
Conclusion
From our nationwide data, we identified a broad range of risk factors associated with coercive measures. Our findings can assist researchers in identifying patients at risk of coercion and thereby help targeting new coercion reduction programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lay B, Nordt C, Rossler W (2011) Variation in use of coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals. Eur Psychiatry 26(4):244–251. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.11.007
Kalisova L, Raboch J, Nawka A, Sampogna G, Cihal L, Kallert TW, Onchev G, Karastergiou A, Del Vecchio V, Kiejna A, Adamowski T, Torres-Gonzales F, Cervilla JA, Priebe S, Giacco D, Kjellin L, Dembinskas A, Fiorillo A (2014) Do patient and ward-related characteristics influence the use of coercive measures? Results from the EUNOMIA international study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 49(10):1619–1629. doi:10.1007/s00127-014-0872-6
Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, Koivisto AM, Lonnqvist J, Kaltiala-Heino R (2010) Who are the restrained and secluded patients: a 15-year nationwide study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 45(11):1087–1093. doi:10.1007/s00127-009-0150-1
Husum TL, Bjorngaard JH, Finset A, Ruud T (2010) A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics. BMC Health Serv Res 10:89. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-89
Luciano M, Sampogna G, Del Vecchio V, Pingani L, Palumbo C, De Rosa C, Catapano F, Fiorillo A (2014) Use of coercive measures in mental health practice and its impact on outcome: a critical review. Expert Rev Neurother 14(2):131–141. doi:10.1586/14737175.2014.874286
Steinert T, Lepping P, Bernhardsgrutter R, Conca A, Hatling T, Janssen W, Keski-Valkama A, Mayoral F, Whittington R (2010) Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 45(9):889–897. doi:10.1007/s00127-009-0132-3
Danish Health Authority (2010) Anvendelse af Tvang i Psykiatrien 2008. The Danish Health Authority, Copenhagen
Steinert T, Bergbauer G, Schmid P, Gebhardt RP (2007) Seclusion and restraint in patients with schizophrenia: clinical and biographical correlates. J Nerv Ment Dis 195(6):492–496. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3180302af6
Bowers L, Van Der Merwe M, Paterson B, Stewart D (2012) Manual restraint and shows of force: the City-128 study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 21(1):30–40. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0349.2011.00756.x
Noorthoorn E, Lepping P, Janssen W, Hoogendoorn A, Nijman H, Widdershoven G, Steinert T (2015) One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. doi:10.1007/s00127-015-1094-2
Salize HJ (2004) Epidemiology of involuntary placement of mentally ill people across the European Union. Br J Psychiatry 184:163–168
Pedersen CB (2011) The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health 39(7 Suppl):22–25. doi:10.1177/1403494810387965
Sundhedsdatastyrelsen Register over Anvendelse af Tvang i Psykiatrien. http://www.esundhed.dk/. Accessed 16 June 2016
Mors O, Perto GP, Mortensen PB (2011) The Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register. Scand J Public Health 39(7 Suppl):54–57. doi:10.1177/1403494810395825
Statistics Denmark (2014) Statistikdokumentation for Byopgørelsen 1. Januar 2014 (Dwellings). Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen
Statistics Denmark (2015) Register-og Variabeloversigter. Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen
Statistics Denmark (1991) IDA: an integrated database for labour market research. Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen
Statistics Denmark (2014) Indkomststatistik. Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen
Statistics Denmark (2014) Hele Uddannelser med Eksamensgennemsnit. Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen
Statistics Denmark (2014) Højest Fuldført Uddannelse. Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen
Statistics Denmark (2013) Asylansoegninger og Opholdstilladelser. Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen
Statistics Denmark (2015) Befolkningen. Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen
World Health Organization (1992) The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines
Erlangsen A, Lind BD, Stuart EA, Qin P, Stenager E, Larsen KJ, Wang AG, Hvid M, Nielsen AC, Pedersen CM, Winsløv J-H, Langhoff C, Mühlmann C, Nordentoft M (2015) Short-term and long-term effects of psychosocial therapy for people after deliberate self-harm: a register-based, nationwide multicentre study using propensity score matching. Lancet Psychiatry 2(1):49–58. doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(14)00083-2
Teasdale TW, Frosig AJ (2013) Cognitive ability and educational level in relation to concussion: a population study of young men. BMJ Open 3(3). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002321
Teasdale TW, Hartmann PV, Pedersen CH, Bertelsen M (2011) The reliability and validity of the Danish Draft Board Cognitive Ability Test: Borge Prien’s Prove. Scand J Psychol 52(2):126–130. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00862.x
Pedersen CB (2006) No evidence of time trends in the urban-rural differences in schizophrenia risk among five million people born in Denmark from 1910 to 1986. Psychol Med 36(2):211–219. doi:10.1017/S003329170500663X
World Health Organisation (2003) List of memberstates by WHO region and mortality stratum. World Health Organisation, Geneva
Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (2002) The analysis of longitudinal data, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kaltiala-Heino R, Korkeila J, Tuohimaki C, Tuori T, Lehtinen V (2000) Coercion and restrictions in psychiatric inpatient treatment. Eur Psychiatry 15(3):213–219
Knutzen M, Mjosund NH, Eidhammer G, Lorentzen S, Opjordsmoen S, Sandvik L, Friis S (2011) Characteristics of psychiatric inpatients who experienced restraint and those who did not: a case–control study. Psychiatr Serv 62(5):492–497. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.62.5.49210.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0492
Norredam M, Garcia-Lopez A, Keiding N, Krasnik A (2010) Excess use of coercive measures in psychiatry among migrants compared with native Danes. Acta Psychiatr Scand 121(2):143–151. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01418.x
Webber M, Huxley P (2004) Social exclusion and risk of emergency compulsory admission. A case–control study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39(12):1000–1009. doi:10.1007/s00127-004-0836-3
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the Mental Health Centre, Frederiksberg. Thomsen received funding from the Danish Health Authority as a part of PhD training. The authors are grateful to the head of the Mental Health Centre, Frederiksberg, Dr. Kristen Kistrup for making the research possible. In addition, we thank Dr. Holger Jelling Sørensen at the Mental Health Centre, Copenhagen, for his valuable advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical standards
All personal information from the registers is anonymized when used for research purposes and the project was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency, hence, according to Danish legislation, informed consent from participants was not required.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomsen, C., Starkopf, L., Hastrup, L.H. et al. Risk factors of coercion among psychiatric inpatients: a nationwide register-based cohort study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 52, 979–987 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1363-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1363-3